Category Archives: Ron Paul

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 20 – The Establishment strategy for electing Rand Paul

Now that Rand Paul, the chosen candidate of the Rockefeller/BRICS New World Order, has officially entered the race for President, both his campaign and the mainstream media have been offering previews of how the globalists will sell him to the public.

His campaign is presenting him as the anti-Establishment candidate. This is reflected in his campaign slogan…

As he presents himself in this light, the mainstream media will attack him in a ham-fisted manner…

With one hand, the MSM will attempt to tie him to the “extreme views” of his father, Ron Paul, which will actually enhance his popularity with the frustrated electorate. And with the other hand, they will distort his views in such an obvious way that their attacks will come across as unfair in the public eye. As they fling each absurd allegation at Rand, they will effectively serve him with softballs that he can knock out of the park with his rebuttals. The public will thus perceive him as being under severe attack by the Establishment, and they will see him effectively defeating the attacks and making the attackers look like fools. All this will cement his image as an “outsider” who “strikes fear into the heart of the Washington machine.”

Simultaneously, the press will present heavy coverage of the Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton candidacies. The right-leaning press will present Jeb as the Republican front-runner while highlighting the Clintons’ many scandals, and the left-leaning press will present Hillary as the Democratic front-runner while highlighting the Bushes’ many scandals. This will serve to generate a feeling of disgust among the public at the prospect of facing yet another Bush/Clinton presidential ballot. In fact, the media will present articles on this subject to further foster the seeds of discontent within the public mind…
…(from FT)

Faced with the situation of having the “Washington machine’s” tainted candidates (Bush and Clinton) shoved down their throats again, the public will be looking for a credible “outsider” who offers to “Defeat the Washington Machine and Unleash the American Dream.” And once the next economic crisis hits and the MSM pillory the Federal Reserve for causing it, Mr. “Audit the Fed” will look like a genius.

In the next update, we’ll look at Rand Paul’s connection to the Mises Mafia. For the previous updates in this series, click here.

Much love…

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 14 – The coming BRICS gold standard, Ron Paul, and the Rockefellers

I just came across a Zerohedge article titled “Is Russia Planning A Gold-Based Currency?” To give a simple answer to the question posed by the title, “yes,” both Russia and China (and possibly other BRICS allies) are planning to go to a partial gold backing for their currencies. And once they do, the globalist propaganda organs will laud the move as “the masterstroke that peacefully defeated the Western banksters.”

The (globalist orchestrated) BRICS move towards a partial gold standard goes beyond their own national currencies, though. To “save the international financial system from cataclysm,” they will also offer a portion of their gold reserves to back the IMF’s SDR, and they will receive a large allotment of SDRs in return. This “gold for SDRs” strategy was hinted at in a (UK) Royal Institute of International Affairs paper titled Adding Gold into the Valuation of the SDR

According to the globalist script, in return for “saving the IMF and the international financial system” with their gold, the BRICS (particularly China) will demand sweeping governance reforms of the IMF and the rest of the UN Complex, as well as a Chinese IMF head. The Chinese would then “own” the New World Order system in the way that George Soros described back in 2009 (if you haven’t read the linked article, please do so; you’ll find it complements this one quite nicely).

Also worth noting is that the article came from The Mises Institute. I’ve been noticing a lot of positive propaganda surrounding Ludwig von Mises and Austrian Economics, and this leads me to believe that the banksters will impose the Austrian model after the Transition. If you go to the Mises Institute website, you’ll notice that their logo looks like a royal crest…
…And if you go to Ludwig von Mises’ bio page on Wikipedia, you find out why…

So the Mises family has a strong connection to the Occulted Powers (the “royals”), and Ludwig himself was brought to America by the leading architects of the New World Order, the Rockefellers. According to this article from The Independent Institute

Many readers may be surprised to learn the extent to which the Graduate Institute and then Mises himself in the years immediately after he came to United States were kept afloat financially through generous grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. In fact, for the first years of Mises’s life in the United States, before his appointment as a visiting professor in the Graduate School of Business Administration at New York University (NYU) in 1945, he was almost totally dependent on annual research grants from the Rockefeller Foundation. Even after he finally landed the position at NYU, where he remained only a visiting professor until his retirement in 1969, his salary was paid for not by NYU, but from funds contributed by generous private supporters.”

With Ludwig von Mises’ intimate connections to the European “royals” and the Rockefellers established, it is informative to look at who is pushing his theories today.

Wouldn’t you know it, Ron Paul is involved

…as are Marine Le Pen and Nigel Farage…

>>> In November 2011, a press release announces laconic Marine Le Pen’s accession to the European Alliance for Freedom. This alliance carefully selects its members. It is a creation of Godfrey Bloom, member of the Von Mises Institute and UKIP [the UKIP is the UK Independence Party, which is headed by Nigel Farage]. Marine Le Pen is currently vice-president of the FAE.

Ludwig von Mises was an Austrian and American economist who has had a significant influence on the liberal and modern libertarian movement. Strong supporter of the invisible hand against the state, in all things, it is the market that any decision should be ordered.

Frits Bolkestein, the origin of the famous deregulation Directive is also a member of the Von Mises Institute

[This is a Google translation of this portion of a Wikipedia discussion of Marine Le Pen (with my comments added in brackets).] <<<

As I covered in an entry titled Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags (and the real agenda behind the Paris attacks), these are the political figures being positioned by the globalists to take over after the Transition Crisis (during which the dollar will be taken down as the global reserve currency). So keep these facts in mind…

> The Mises Institute is a globalist institution and Austrian Economics is the next globalist economic theory-du-jour.

> Ron Paul is a sellout who has been positioned as “the principled outsider/dissenter” so he (or his son Rand) can take leadership after the Transition (click here to read entries about Ron Paul’s NWO role).

> The New World Order will look like freedom… at first. This is so you’ll embrace it. And once you become dependent on it, they will start tightening the screws.

[Addendum 1 – 17 June 2015]

More on Austrian Economics’ connection to the “royals”

Let’s have look at how Austrian Economics began…

“The school originated in Vienna, in the Austrian Empire. Carl Menger’s 1871 book, Principles of Economics, is generally considered the founding of the Austrian School.”source

“Menger was born in the city of Nowy Sącz in Austrian Galicia, which is now in Poland. He was the son of a wealthy family of minor nobility

In 1876 Menger began tutoring Archduke Rudolf von Habsburg, the Crown Prince of Austria in political economy and statistics…

In 1878 Rudolf’s father, Emperor Franz Josef, appointed Menger to the chair of political economy at Vienna. The title of Hofrat [Councilor] was conferred on him, and he was appointed to the Austrian Herrenhaus [Imperial Council] in 1900.”source

As you can see, the connection between the “royals” and Austrian Economics goes all the way back to its origin. Knowing this, ask yourself, “What was the royals’ interest in this? Were they developing this theory for the good of the serfs, or was it developed in an attempt to maximize the power and wealth of their royal families?”

The answer is pretty clear, isn’t it? The interest of the “royals” (who are now the “Occulted Powers” since they erected the Democratic Facade between themselves and their slaves) is in maximizing their wealth and power by finding the best balance between wealth production and wealth extraction. In other words, “How do you get the serfs to produce the most while simultaneously getting them to hand over the most?”

For more information on the Rockefeller connection to Austrian Economics, click here. And for the previous updates in this series, click here.

Love always…

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Updates 8-11 – George Soros, the dollar/renminbi peg, and the “Fed mistake”

[Update 8 – 22 January 2015]

With the globalists sipping champagne and nibbling caviar at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, it’s no surprise to see preparatory propaganda for the coming “Fed mistake” being presented on the 22nd of January…

In this instance, former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers is preparing us for what is to come. According to the Telegraph article

>>> The United States risks a deflationary spiral and a depression-trap that would engulf the world if the Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy too soon, a top panel of experts has warned…

“There is no confident basis for tightening. The Fed should not be fighting against inflation until it sees the whites of its eyes. That is a long way off,” he [Larry Summers] said, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Mr Summers said the world economy is entering treacherous waters as the US expansion enters its seventh year, reaching the typical life-expectancy of recoveries. <<<

So with his remarks, he is establishing an expectation for the end of the “recovery” and for the “mistake” the Fed will make this year. And after establishing that an “epochal deflationary crisis” will come if the Fed tightens money policy “too soon,” Christine Lagarde is then reported saying this…

>>> Mrs Lagarde said the IMF expects the Fed to raise rates in the middle of the year, sooner than markets expect. <<<

In other words, she is expecting the Fed to tighten monetary policy too soon.

The article also quotes Lagarde saying something that is interesting in light of the George Soros interview I’ve been writing about…

>>> “If the US is in a bad place, we are short of any engine at the moment, so I hope you are wrong,” said Christine Lagarde, the head of the International Monetary Fund. <<<

So if the US economic engine stops driving the world economy, which nation will take its place? According to the George Soros FT interview

China will emerge as the motor replacing the US consumer and, of course, it’s a smaller motor because the Chinese economy is much smaller. So the world economy will have less of a motor, so it will move forward slower than it has in the last 25 years. But China will be the engine driving it forward…”

Another thing that Soros mentions in the interview is the effect of China de-pegging the renminbi from the dollar. Given what happened with the Swiss franc and the euro this month, that is something else we should be watching for. Another form the “Fed mistake” could take is doing quantitative easing instead of raising rates, and that could trigger de-pegging like it did in Europe. I’ll cover this in another update.

[Update 9 – 23 January 2015]

Are Netanyahu and the Pope setting up a time window for war?

Two peculiar things I’ve watched pop up in the news are the planned US visits of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Pope Francis, both of whom are to give speeches before joint sessions of Congress this year.

When I first saw news of Netanyahu’s visit, his speech was scheduled for February 11 (2/11), but it has since moved to March 3 (3/3). And the Pope’s arrival in the US is scheduled for September 22 (9/22). These dates suggest that Judeo-Masonic mischief is afoot. But what sort of mischief?

If we look to the public personas of the two, Netanyahu is seen as a war hawk and the Pope as a peace dove, so this suggests we might be looking at a “war window”: two points in time that mark the beginning and end of a period of staged military conflict. According to some news reports, such as this one at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
…the Israelis and Republicans are doing an end-run around Obama which could possibly lead to war. Will the Pope then come to bring peace?

During any other year, I wouldn’t pay much mind to the two visits, but 2015 isn’t going to be like any other year.

I’ll keep an eye on this…

[Update 10 – 24 January 2015]

Congress may be waiting for “Fed Mistake” before passing audit bill

We’re nearing the end of January, and neither the mainstream media nor the Congress have been talking much about the “Audit the Fed” effort. The articles that have been trickling out of the MSM have appeared in local outlets, but they feature wording that’s worth noting. Here’s a snippet from a Raleigh News & Observer piece

“Detractors from both major political parties are preparing legislation to rein in the powers of the Federal Reserve, moves that would test and potentially restrain its independence.

The proposals include ordering a broad audit of the central bank, including its secret policy making, and giving Congress the power to confirm or reject the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, one of the most influential…

Since 1913, the Fed has used closed-door deliberations to conduct monetary policy, raising its benchmark interest rates when the economy gets too hot and inflation is a threat, and cutting them in a bid to spark activity when economic recovery loses steam.”

They are making a point of mentioning that the audit will cover the Fed’s monetary policymaking, which could be a hint that the legislation will be advanced when the Fed makes its big “mistake” with regards to monetary policy.

In the meantime, Sputnik (a newly branded Russian government propaganda outlet), is promoting Ron Paul and the endgame of the Fed audit maneuver
…May God bless our elite-sponsored “hero,” Ron Paul. 🙂

[Update 11 – 24 January 2015]

George Soros, the dollar/renminbi peg, and the “Fed mistake”

So far this month, we have seen lots of drama coming out of the central banks. And amidst this drama, three notable precedents have emerged…

1) Central banks are making abrupt, market-shocking changes in policy direction.

As noted in Update 4, we have seen this in Switzerland, and we’ve also now seen it in Canada. If you haven’t heard what Canada did, have a look at this Economist article

THE Bank of Canada does not like to surprise the markets and usually signals changes to its benchmark interest rate well in advance. But on January 21st markets were shocked by the bank’s decision to drop the target for the overnight rate from 1% to just 0.75%.”

2) Central banks are lowering interest rates and doing quantitative easing.

Canada lowered its rate and the European Central Bank announced a 60 billion euro per month bond buying program.

3) A central bank has removed a currency peg.

The Swiss de-pegged their franc from the euro using the ECB’s anticipated quantitative easing as an excuse.

Looking at these three precedents, let’s have another look at the anticipated “Fed mistake.” So far, the expectation has been that it would take the form of the Fed raising their interest rates too soon and/or too much. But what would happen if they instead followed the precedents set by the other central banks?

Before answering this question, let’s look back at what George Soros said about the dollar and China’s renminbi back in 2009 (for more information on this interview, see George Soros and the elite’s China-fronted New World Order)…

From here: “Well, certainly a decline in the value of the dollar is necessary in order to compensate for the fact that the US economy will remain rather weak — will be a drag on the global economy.”

From here: “And basically the renminbi is permanently undervalued because it’s tied to the dollar.”

From here: “As long as the renminbi is tied to the dollar, I don’t see how the decline in the dollar can go too far.”

From here: Interviewer – “Do you think it’s possible to persuade China to allow the renminbi to become stronger?”

Soros – “I think that they would be… they have been agitating for it, so I would take them at their word…”

(Keep in mind that the Chinese are attempting to transition from an export-based economy to one based on domestic consumption, so an increase in the renminbi’s value would help with that.)

What Soros is implying with his statements is that the renminbi is like a helium balloon that naturally wants to go up (because of the “strength” of the Chinese economy and China’s vast commodity assets), and the dollar is like a weight that naturally wants to go down (because of the “weakness” of the US economy and the dollar’s diminishing use as the world’s reserve currency). So as long as the two currencies are tied together by the Chinese government’s dollar peg policy, the renminbi is weighed down by the dollar and the dollar is held up by the renminbi. If you untie the two, the balloon will rise and the weight will fall.

Now imagine this…

After making a big show of supposedly tapering and then stopping its quantitative easing, and after getting all the markets to expect an interest rate increase sometime in 2015, the Fed instead does the exact opposite and restarts QE (they would do this under the pretext that the QE from all the other central banks is making the dollar too strong and exports too expensive, thus threatening the US “recovery”). The Chinese, in turn, could use such a Fed move as the pretext for de-pegging their currency like the Swiss did. This could cause an abrupt dollar/renminbi currency move which could be greatly exacerbated if the Chinese also did one or both of the following:

1) Announce that in addition to depegging, they will start moving towards a gold backing for the renminbi.

2) Begin unloading large quantities of their US Treasury bonds using the excuse that the Fed is irresponsibly inflating away the value of China’s dollar holdings.

The ensuing currency shock could then give rise to a “multilateral solution” through the IMF.

This leaves us with three candidates for the “Fed mistake”…

1) The Fed goes against the flow of the other central banks and raises interest rates too much / too soon, thus causing a shock in the markets.

2) The Fed goes with the flow of the other central banks by reversing course and reinstituting QE, thus causing the Chinese to abandon their dollar peg.

3) The Fed does nothing, and after the speculative bubbles burst and sink the system, they get blamed for letting the bubbles grow too large on account of their too loose, too long monetary policy.

Get out the popcorn. This should be fun to watch.

For the previous updates in this series, click here.

Ron Paul: Standing strong and telling it like it ain’t (Update 1 – Selective Truthing)

“We will lead every revolution against us”…

For any who might still be wondering if Ron Paul is a globalist-run controlled opposition figure, have a look at his new Lessons from Paris essay. Here are some key excerpts…

“After the tragic shooting at a provocative magazine in Paris last week, I pointed out that given the foreign policy positions of France we must consider blowback as a factor.”

In this essay, Paul is treating the Paris attacks like they’re real terrorist events conducted by real Muslim extremists as retaliation for France’s interventionist foreign policy. There is no mention whatsoever of the possibility that the attacks are a false-flag conducted by the globalist intelligence agencies. This is a stunning oversight considering what he goes on to say next…

“If Islamic extremism is on the rise, the US and French governments are at least partly to blame. The two Paris shooters had reportedly spent the summer in Syria fighting with the rebels seeking to overthrow Syrian President Assad. They were also said to have recruited young French Muslims to go to Syria and fight Assad. But France and the United States have spent nearly four years training and equipping foreign fighters to infiltrate Syria and overthrow Assad! In other words, when it comes to Syria, the two Paris killers were on ‘our’ side.”

By now, it is known to everyone with a brain stem that the globalist intelligence agencies are the ones behind recruiting, organizing, training, arming and funding Islamic extremists throughout the world. Even Paul admits this…

“Beginning with Afghanistan in the 1980s, the US and its allies have deliberately radicalized Muslim fighters in the hopes they would strictly fight those they are told to fight. We learned on 9/11 that sometimes they come back to fight us.”

Brainstem-equipped persons further know that the agencies move these mercenary assets to wherever they want to create trouble, and that includes the US and Europe. Notice that Paul doesn’t admit this. He instead implies that these young men “left the reservation” and did it all on their own out of anger over France’s foreign policy. There is no mention of even the possibility that the attackers were either intelligence assets or naive young ideologues being manipulated by agency handlers and deliberately tasked to conduct the attack. Note also how Paul applies the same argument to 9/11: it was no false-flag, just blowback from our own foreign policy.

“We have learned that the two suspected attackers had long been under the watch of US and French intelligence services. They had reportedly been placed on the US no-fly list and at least one of them had actually been convicted in 2008 of trying to travel to Iraq to fight against the US occupation. According to CNN, the two suspects traveled to Yemen in 2011 to train with al-Qaeda. So they were individuals known to have direct terrorist associations. How many red flags is it necessary to set off before action is taken? How long did US and French intelligence know about them and do nothing, and why?

Isn’t the “why” obvious? The US and French intelligence agencies wanted the attack, but Paul won’t admit this. This leads one to wonder…

Is Ron Paul unaware of the concept of the false-flag attack and its role in statecraft?

Did he not notice how 9/11 was used to drive the population towards accepting the Patriot Act and the War on Terror? Will he now not notice where the globalists are driving the French population with the Paris attacks?

Why did he vote for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists after 9/11?…

>>> Section 2 – Authorization For Use of United States Armed Forces

(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. <<<

While pondering this question, have a look at this video in which We Are Change discusses 9/11 with Paul (starting at the 1:14 mark)

In the video, Paul says this: “Well… you know… I’ve said many times that I don’t think the investigation did any more than cover up the truth…

…The big question is who’s behind it and what’s the motivation…

…[World Trade Center building] number 7 is the one that’s most suspicious…”

So in a private conversation, Paul admits something suspicious went on with 9/11, but his public statements about 9/11 and the other false-flags support the globalist propaganda line: that they’re real terrorist attacks, they’re done by radicalized Muslims, they’re blowback for our interventionist foreign policy, and they’re not false-flags.

The policy of the globalists is to deny 9/11 Truth until it’s time to unveil the “saviors.” At that point, they plan on hitting the public with a phony “Truth Tsunami” to bowl people over and get them thinking that things are really changing. As I noted in The Multilateral/Multipolar New World Order will seem like heaven… at first

>>> The globalists are in the process of running a problem / reaction / SOLUTION scam on us, not a problem / reaction / PROBLEM scam.

This means that when we reach the end result of this transition process, the NWO will look like the SOLUTION to all our problems, not another PROBLEM (such as a dark, scary fascist regime) we need to overcome. It will appear as though the corrupt have been defeated, World War 3 has been stopped, all regional conflicts have been resolved, biowarfare against the population has been halted, poverty has been alleviated, debt money has been abolished, secrets have been revealed, and so on and so forth. And the masses, after having been force-fed negativity and conditioned to expect a scary NWO for so long, are expected to be so overcome with joy that they’ll willingly embrace the New Order. <<<

Once the Truth Tsunami begins, how will Ron Paul explain-away his failure to speak out about the false-flag nature of the attacks?…

“I was limited in what I could publicly say about 9/11 because they had threatened to kill me and my family.”


“I didn’t realize just how deep the corruption and treason ran until I saw all the classified information that has come out recently.”

We’ll find out as early as next year.

[Update 1 – 14 January 2015]

Selective Truthing

A reader has sent me some links that prove Ron Paul is familiar with the concept of the false-flag attack. This article shows that Paul specifically spoke out about the potential that a false-flag could be used to start a war with Iran…

From the 28:15 mark of this video: “What I fear the most is a false flag: something happening where one of our ships goes down, or there’s a plane goes down, and of course it had to be the Iranians, you know — for sure — for certain.”

And from the 1:24 mark of this video: “I am concerned, however, that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin type incident may well occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran.”

The article also notes that none other than Zbigniew Brzezinski also issued such a warning. Here is an excerpt from the Brzezinski link the article offers…

>>> A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a “defensive” U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. <<<

The reader also provided a link to this article which references the 1:40 mark of this video where Paul mentions that the infamous gas attack in Syria might be an Al Qaeda false-flag…

“We’re not really positive who set off the gas. I mean the group that’s most likely to benefit from that is Al Qaeda. They ignite some gas, some people die, and blame it on Assad.”

Seeing all this leaves us with some obvious questions:

Why would Ron Paul, Zbigniew Brzezinski and other globalist mouthpieces be warning about a false-flag against Iran?

Why would Ron Paul blow the whistle on false-flags in Iran and Syria while remaining silent on ones in New York, London, and Paris?

What’s the angle?

The answers to these questions are most interesting and quite revealing, so I will prepare a lengthy entry on the subject and try to release it on Monday. Barring any big unforeseen developments, there will be no further posts till then.

Much love…