Category Archives: Globalist Agenda Watch 2015

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 93 – The IMF is being prepared for the NWO transition (+ a confirmation from PCR)

Last week saw two significant developments in the IMF transition to the NWO financial system:

1) The globalists revived an old corruption charge against IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde…
lagtrial

The resulting trial appears to be the excuse they will use to remove her from her IMF post, thus making way for a Chinaman to take the top spot. And removing her for corruption will reinforce the propaganda narrative about the “corrupt” West.

2) The US Congress finally passed the IMF’s 2010 quota reforms…
congressimf

I was a little surprised they did this, since I was expecting Congress to block the reforms all the way till the NWO transition point. But looking at the net results of the ratification, I see that it actually better serves the transition agenda, because…

> It doubles the amount of funds the IMF can lend out during financial crises, and this will come in quite handy as we enter the emerging market meltdown triggered by the Fed rate hike.

> It allows the 15th General Review of Quotas, which had been delayed by Congress’ previous lack of action on the 14th Review, to go forward just as we’re entering the Big Crisis. This will allow the globalists to restructure the IMF during the Crisis.

> It leaves America’s veto power intact, which will set the stage for the coming climactic showdown between the West and the East over “ownership” of the institution.

Looking at the last two points, two things seem fairly certain: 1) the 15th General Review of Quotas will leave the US with too small a voting share to have veto power over future IMF decisions, and 2) this will be used as a pretext for the US Congress to oppose its ratification. So how will the IMF get around Congress the next time?

Potential answers to this problem are offered by a policy brief from the Peterson Institute for International Economics
peterimf
…The highlighted point is a rather interesting one, isn’t it?

Although this brief was written with the 14th Review in mind, it also speaks of the 15th Review, and it offers two routes the IMF could take in bypassing the US Congress. Here is one…
bypass1
…From page 7.

Basically, it calls for the IMF to structure the reforms in such a way that US law is not triggered, thus allowing the Obama administration to vote for the reforms without Congressional ratification.

Here is the other proposal…
bypass2
…From page 8.

Basically, it calls for the creation of a parallel IMF that is connected to the current one. But unlike the current one, the “SupraFund” would omit US veto power and European “overrepresentation.” And with the rest of the IMF moving away from the West in this manner, the West would be compelled to sign on to avoid becoming isolated. The SupraFund would eclipse the IMF in the same way the G20 eclipsed the G8.

As for when this would take place, the most likely time is September of next year. An expedited 15th Review could be conducted in the first half of 2016, then ratification could occur in the various nations in the second part of the year, with a deadline of September 30. This is the same deadline the IMF has already set for the current SDR basket to expire (with the new yuan-inclusive basket taking effect on October 1)…
imfsepext
…From IMF.org

Take careful note of the underlined passage. Although this sentence was ostensibly added with the Chinese yuan in mind, it could apply to other BRICS currencies as well. Given the upcoming Big Crisis and the IMF’s need for BRICS gold to give the public confidence in the new system, other BRICS currencies could be added to the basket that takes effect on October 1.

At the same time all this is occurring, the US will be gripped by Presidential election politics, and we could see the September prophetic unfolding regarding Obama. So bypassing an America in disarray could be a necessity for the IMF.

All in all, it’s gonna be a helluva year.

Love always….

(P.S. – 21 December 2015)

Before we move on to the next installment of the Globalist Prophecy Watch, let’s take a look at the closing statements of the Peterson Institute policy brief. As you read it, note its supportive tone towards the “evolution of the IMF” and its critical tone towards the US…

>>> If the IMF membership decides it is necessary to put forward this option, I would hope that the United States would join the SupraFund and accept the hastening of the inevitable day when its capacity to block certain decisions in the IMF has been eliminated because its size relative to the global economy has shrunk. This would be a complex way of implementing that reality, but it is one that should be actively considered given that the United States recently has been irresponsible in exercising its capacity to block a needed, important evolution of the IMF in the form of the 2010 reform package.

The impasse over implementation of the 2010 reform package has seriously damaged US leadership and leverage in the IMF with spillovers into other areas of international economic and financial cooperation such as standards governing financial institutions and trade agreements. Partners will increasingly ask: Is it worth doing business with the US executive branch if the US legislative branch will resist or reject resulting international agreements?

The impasse also threatens the central role of the IMF itself because its financing and governance essentially have been frozen. This has in turn accelerated the tendency to replace the IMF (and its Bretton Woods twin, the World Bank Group) with other institutions of international economic and financial cooperation in which the United States has little or no influence—such as the New Development Bank (established by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa with an emergency lending component), the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (led by China), the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization (an Asian self-help financing arrangement), and the European Stability Mechanism (a European self-help financing arrangement). These trends promote the further fragmentation of the international monetary cooperation that underlies everything that the IMF does to promote global economic growth and financial stability.

This Policy Brief has outlined four options to break this impasse. The first two options (doing nothing and waiting for the US Congress to act and restarting the 15th quota review) do not promise to break the impasse, much less move the process of IMF governance reform forward. Consequently, IMF members and the US executive branch should consider the third option (risking loss of the US veto) to bring pressure on the US Congress. If the US executive branch declines to cooperate, the fourth option (bypassing the United States to create a new SupraFund) should be developed as a credible threat. <<<

This passage sounds very New World Orderish, doesn’t it? So who is behind this “Peterson Institute for International Economics?

“The Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE; Peterson Institute), until 2006 the Institute for International Economics (IIE), is a private and non-profit think tank focused on international economics, based in Washington, D.C. It was founded by C. Fred Bergsten in 1981, and is led by Adam S. Posen.” – from Wikipedia

And who is C. Fred Bergsten?

“He was a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations from 1967 to 1968. In 1969 he became assistant for international economic affairs to Henry Kissinger at the National Security Council where he coordinated US foreign economic policy until 1971. From 1972 to 1976 he was a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.” – from Wikipedia

So the guy is a CFR drone and one of Henry Kissinger’s former assistants, and Kissinger is the man who led the Rockefeller project that devised the New World Order implementation plan. And if you look into the backgrounds of Adam Posen (Peterson’s current president) and Edwin Truman (the brief’s author), you’ll find they too have long globalist resumes.

All this being said, why does a policy brief from an American economic think tank sound like something written by a BRICS propaganda organ? Because the globalists built the BRICS, and think tanks like this one devise the moves the BRICS will make on the international stage. It’s all a big play put on for public consumption, and guys like these help write the script.

(P.S. – 22 December 2015) – As expected, the globalist propaganda machine has come out to paint Lagarde as a corrupt vassal of Washington who uses the IMF to serve “Western monied interests.” This piece by disinfo agents Paul Craig Roberts and Stephen Lendman confirms the globalist strategy outlined in this entry, and includes the following passage…

“She’s appealing the ruling against her. Things could drag on for many months before concluding.

Yep, things will indeed drag on for months. And as if by magic, she’ll lose her post right as we hit the NWO transition point and it’s time to put a Chinaman in.

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 92 – The globalists on the financial system: “pull it” (+ a government shutdown update)

Here we go again…
pullit

So EXACTLY 7 years – the “Magic 7” – after the Fed cut their rates to near zero
zerorate
…they finally raised them again. Who’da thunk it?

In the lead-up to today’s Federal Reserve interest rate hike, we heard all kinds of arguments as to why they would or wouldn’t do it. These arguments were based on economic theories, market data, and analyses of how a “rational” Fed would act to “perform its mission of preventing economic shocks, maximizing employment, enhancing stability in prices, and ensuring moderate long-term interest rates.” Such talk was all childish bullsh*t.

The simple truth is that the Fed is pulling the same trick the banksters always use: hand out easy credit until everyone piles on so much debt that they can barely afford to service it, then trigger an economic crisis or an interest rate hike so they can’t service it. Real assets are then seized and the process starts all over again. Only this time, they aim to get a New World Order out of it too.

From this point on, things will go roughly like this…

1) A growing wave of trouble will wash over the emerging market nations, sending them hat-in-hand to the multilateral institutions, especially those of the BRICS nations. The help they receive will come with multilateral strings attached.

2) Another growing wave, that of disgust, will also sweep through the developing nations (DNs). This disgust will be directed at the West, especially the United States and its military and monetary policies, and the DNs will demand change to how the world is run.

3) The Next Lehman Moment will occur, which will bring down the West and the whole global financial system. It is at this point that the BRICS will pull out their trump card: their gold reserves. They will add gold valuation to their currencies and will also offer to save the financial system, but only if “real reforms” are made.

4) The UN, IMF, and World Bank will receive a facelift, and the New World Order will then be in effect. This should occur around September of 2016.

Don’t worry, though, the NWO is designed to last for only 7 years. So we have from now till late 2023 to wake up and step away from the bullet that’s coming our way.

(P.S. – 16 December 2015) – Now here’s a date that makes me uncomfortable: December 22nd (22 is a Masonic Master Number that can represent “disastrous downfall”). The Congress is expected to pass a stopgap spending bill today to keep the government open through that date. So if something should happen to interrupt the budget process (like an “ISIS” attack in Washington), the government will shut down on midnight of the 22nd, right before Christmas.

Even if the budget does get passed before then, keep an eye out for “ISIS” false-flags in multiple cities during the Christmas to New Year’s timeframe.

Love always…

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 91 – Selling dialectic conflict and nuclear Armageddon the Paul Craig Roberts way (+ Addendum 1)

Have a look at what our favorite globalist shill, Paul Craig Roberts, published yesterday…
pcrsput
…From Sputnik

It is a classic piece of Evil West vs. Good East dialectic propaganda, featuring the evil Neocons and the spectre of nuclear war. And it’s just in time for the holidays!

It also mentions something I was too busy to cover this week…

>>> Even the International Monetary Fund (IMF), allegedly a neutral, non-political world organization, has been suborned into the fight against Russia. Under Washington’s pressure, the IMF has abandoned its policy of refusing to lend to debtors who are in arrears in their loan payments to creditors.  In the case of Ukraine’s debt to Russia, this decision removes the enforcement mechanism that prevents countries (such as Greece) from defaulting on their debts. The IMF has announced that it will lend to Ukraine in order to pay the Ukraine’s Western creditors despite the fact that Ukraine has renounced repayment of loans from Russia.

In other words, the IMF is presenting itself, although the financial media will not notice, as a tool of US foreign policy.  

What this shows, and what should concern us, is that the institutions of Western civilization are in fact tools of American dominance. The institutions are not there for the noble reasons stated in their founding documents. <<<

Roberts is, of course, misrepresenting the way things are. In truth, the UN/IMF/World Bank, America, and the Neoconservatives are all tools of the GLOBALISTS. The globalists are the ones driving all this, not the captive American nation-state or the designated “bad guys / scapegoats” in this little drama, the Neocons. And far from being a tool of US national interests, the IMF just added the Chinese renminbi to their SDR basket of currencies because the globalists plan to give the Chinese “ownership” of the institution after the transition. Here is an excerpt from George Soros and the China-fronted NWO >>>

sorospic

Starting at the 9:26 mark of this video and continuing on into the second part, George Soros tells us why the globalists used China to bring in the NWO…

I think this would be the time, because you really need to bring China into the creation of a new world order — financial world order. They are kind of reluctant members of the IMF. They play along, but they don’t make much of a contribution because it’s not their institution. Their share is not commeasurate — their voting rights are not commeasurate — to their weight. So I think you need a New World Order that China has to be part of the process of creating it, and they have to buy in. They have to own it the same way as I said the United States owns… the Washington consensus… the current order, and I think this would be a more stable one where you would have a coordinated policies.

<<<END EXCERPT

To put it plainly, the IMF cafeteria will soon be removing foie gras from the menu and adding shark fin…
lagnzhouxiao

This being the case, why the row over Ukrainian loans? Because it’s an insignificant issue that can be used to animate the dialectic conflict. It was a move the IMF made to support the globalist propaganda effort. And in Update 24, I wrote about where they’re going with this…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

The seeming insanity of recent US government policies is not the result of stupidity or incompetence; it is all very deliberate, and it’s intended to make the West look bad and the East look good. So when the “wise” BRICS leaders sweep in to wrest control of the UN/IMF/World Bank from the “insane” Western leaders, people are expected to accept that the “new management” will finally make these institutions work like the textbooks say they should. Unfortunately, though, the globalists built the BRICS and wrote the textbooks, so the whole setup is an increasingly transparent scam.

Once UN/IMF/World Bank“governance reforms” are enacted by the “heroic” BRICS, watch for controlled opposition agents like Paul Craig Roberts and Ron Paul to temper their criticism of those institutions. “We supported shutting down the UN/IMF/World Bank because they were instruments of the American Empire used to bully the world,” they will say, “but now that they’ve been reformed to be truly balanced and democratic, perhaps these organizations can finally live up to the high ideals they were supposedly built to uphold.”

As the upcoming East versus West climax approaches, remember that the main purpose behind the whole drama is to rejuvenate the UN brand. In the course of building the New World Order, the UN/IMF/World Bank name has become tarnished, so an “Under New Ownership/Management” sign is needed to lure people back to their brand. The BRICS-induced “governance reforms” will provide the fresh coat of paint the UN will need to gain public acceptance.

<<<END EXCERPT

With the final paragraph of this excerpt in mind, have a look at what the Pope talked about during his US visit…
alexpopeun

“…Pope Francis makes three important proposals for the reform and renewal of the UN system

…the pope lends his support to the hotly debated proposals to reform the UN Security Council and international financial institutions such as the International Monetary Fund.” – From AmericaMedia.org

Now that the globalists have locked-in both the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda and the Paris Agreement on Climate Change, we’ll see the sh*t hitting the fan, and that right soon. Stock up on popcorn; it’s gonna be a helluva show.

[Addendum 1 – 14 December 2015]

Someone did a halfway decent job trolling this article over on Zero Hedge, so I thought I’d address his points…

Comment part 1 >>> It’s interesting – I had to read it twice to understand its stance – but very short on facts and logic. It criticizes PCR for “selling dialectic conflict and nuclear armageddon” without really understanding what dialectic (Hegellian) is, so it doesn’t make sense. <<<

So the commenter begins by using a straw man to try to make me look stupid. You can find the definition of the word “dialectic” here. He is pointing to definition 6 and saying it doesn’t apply, but I was using definition 9.

Comment part 2 >>> It almost seems as though the author has little or no idea of the UN’s security council veto process, of which the USA is a permanent member. There has not been a resolution in its history that got passed with an objection from the USA. Never. Nor will this change. <<<

Just watch it change. Changing the composition and operation of the Security Council is one of the key objectives of the currently unfolding Big Economic/Military Crisis. I wrote about this in Update 16 – The BRICS and the UN governance reform scam, which contains this…
chinunsc

Take careful note of the passage which says, “Measure(s) should also be taken to improve the working method of the Security Council with a view to enhance the efficiency and transparency of the Council’s work.” This means they’ll be taking away the ability of any single permanent member to veto Security Council action.

Comment part 3 >>> There has also never been a policy implemented without the USA’s permission at the IMF and the World Bank. Both institutions were created by the USA and BOTH institutions, even right NOW, are controlled by the huge margin of voting power of the USA. It takes an 85% majority to implement a policy change at the IMF. Even at the current voting power of “only” 16.74%, you can see that nothing can be done without America’s permission. (By contrast, the UK has 4.29% voting power, China has 3.81%) <<<

Correction: both institutions were created by the Rockefellers and their affiliated internationalist families and minions, not by the American nation-state. And they intend to dilute America’s voting power in the IMF in order to remove its effective veto power. They’ll do this by giving new SDR allocations to the BRICS in exchange for excess dollar reserves and gold. I covered this in Update 14 – The coming BRICS gold standard, Ron Paul, and the Rockefellers. Here is an excerpt >>>

I just came across a Zerohedge article titled “Is Russia Planning A Gold-Based Currency?” To give a simple answer to the question posed by the title, “yes,” both Russia and China (and possibly other BRICS allies) are planning to go to a partial gold backing for their currencies. And once they do, the globalist propaganda organs will laud the move as “the masterstroke that peacefully defeated the Western banksters.”

The (globalist orchestrated) BRICS move towards a partial gold standard goes beyond their own national currencies, though. To “save the international financial system from cataclysm,” they will also offer a portion of their gold reserves to back the IMF’s SDR, and they will receive a large allotment of SDRs in return. This “gold for SDRs” strategy was hinted at in a (UK) Royal Institute of International Affairs paper titled Adding Gold into the Valuation of the SDR
chathamgold

According to the globalist script, in return for “saving the IMF and the international financial system” with their gold, the BRICS (particularly China) will demand sweeping governance reforms of the IMF and the rest of the UN Complex, as well as a Chinese IMF head. The Chinese would then “own” the New World Order system in the way that George Soros described back in 2009 (if you haven’t read the linked article, please do so; you’ll find it complements this one quite nicely).

<<<END EXCERPT

Comment part 4 >>> The author believes it is all a deliberate ploy to make the “West” look bad and “East” (BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) look good. I don’t get it. The ratio of IMF/World Bank funds to the BRICS is massive. The AIIB just got started a few months ago and looks puny in comparison. Paranoia needs some facts about its source of fear to back it up, but this lacks any figures, stats and rationale. The BRICS taking over the IMF is stupid. In other words, it’s pure shit. Sorry mate, but you deserve it for wasting my time and obsfucating the role of the zionists in fomenting a shooting war that is going on RIGHT NOW in Syria and elsewhere. <<<

After the Big Crisis, the BRICS will become the glamorized “leaders” of the UN Complex, but they will not control it. It will be a multilateral/multipolar system in which no nation dominates. The only ones who will dominate the NWO will be the Occulted Powers (the royal families + Jewish financiers) who rule us from behind the Democratic Facade.

Love always…

Globalist Prophecy Watch: Update 2 – Will Pope Francis go down with the West?

If the Western Roman Catholic Church goes down…
lastpopecov
…what Roman church will remain?

Up until recently, I expected Pope Francis to welcome-in the coming “fake Christ / real Antichrist” figure [whom I’ll call “Facra” (fake Christ / real Antichrist)]. But as I observe the preparatory propaganda coming out of Infowars, I’m beginning to think the Pope will be swept aside by Facra. Perhaps I should start from the beginning…

In the originating entry of this series, the globalist-engineered 3-Step Second Coming scenario was laid out:

Step 1) the “fake Antichrist” (Obama) is publicly revealed in 2016 before being taken down in September;

Step 2) the “fake Christ / real Antichrist, “ Facra, makes the scene next year and defeats Obama;

Step 3) the “real Christ” makes the scene in 2023 and defeats Facra, thus bringing in a post-NWO theocratic dictatorship.

Also mentioned earlier in this series was a supposed “Illuminati defector” named Carolyn Hamlett. And wouldn’t you know it, Carolyn has recently come out and talked about the 3-Step Second Coming scenario…
3hamlett
…(Link)

On a hunch, I decided to do a search on “Alex Jones Carolyn Hamlett” and found that the two have had a connection. In fact, Alex featured an article by Carolyn on Infowars.com…
alexcarolyn
…(Link)

And lately, Alex has featured another supposed “Illuminati defector” named Leo Zagami in his videos and on Infowars…
alexleo3
…(Link)

And this brings us to the Pope. Here are a few points worth noting…

Point 1) Zagami is claiming that Bergoglio will resign the papacy in July of 2016…

>>> Two separate reliable sources within the Vatican stated that Pope Francis will resign next year.

This will occur during his pastoral visit to his nation of Argentina, and the two neighboring countries of Chile and Uruguay, in the period of time that coincides with the bicentennial of the 1816 Argentine Declaration of Independence. <<<

Such a resignation would provide a nice buildup to a September “Christ vs. Antichrist” showdown, wouldn’t it?

Point 2) He also mentions conflict between Pope Francis (who can be characterized as a “leftist”) and conservative bishops (“right-wingers”)…

>>> In fact, the last few days of the Synod, Pope Francis was questioned by influential conservative Bishops for his recent visit to the US. In their eyes it was a complete failure that alienated traditional Catholics in favor of a highly questionable liberal communistic approach that of course was crafted to comply with the New Word Order agenda. <<<

This mirrors the same setup that’s taking place in the political realm. “Liberal” politicians in Europe and the US are carrying out outrageous policies (such as on immigration/refugees) to set up a “conservative” backlash that will propel the “right-wing” into power (and Austrian Economics into the economic system).

Point 3) Zagami ties the Ziojews into the “corruption” of the Catholic Church…

>>> Two conferences were arranged in Rome for this purpose by various Jesuits, one took place Friday, October 2nd, at the Angelicum, the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, the other on October 3rd, at the Centro Pellegrini “Santa Teresa Couderc,” in Via Vincenzo Ambrosio with the title, “Ways of Love.” It became not only the foundation meeting for the Global Network of Rainbow Catholics, but also the place chosen for the “Coming out” stunt of Father Charamsa, arranged by the famous homosexual spin doctor, Emilio Sturla Turno, who is said to be sentimentally involved with a Israeli intelligence asset, demonstrating the many hidden interests involved in this operation. <<<

This ties into the whole “synagogue of Satan” (SOS) theme they’ve been spinning. They claim that the Catholic Church has been infiltrated by the SOS, and this is why traditional Christianity has been upended.

Point 4) In other writings, Zagami also talks about Pope Francis being “the Last Pope”…
finpopza

So his writings complement those of other “Final Pope” propagandists like Tom Horn.

Viewing these points, here are some questions I’m pondering…

> Will the East/West New World Order dialectic be accompanied by an East/West Roman Empire church dialectic?

> Will mortally-damning information about the Catholic Church be released during next year’s limited hangout truth tsunami?

> If Pope Francis brings the Catholic Church “to its end,” what Roman Empire church will be left standing? The Eastern Orthodox Church (Putin’s Church), right?

> So will Facra be a “conservative Christian” who comes out of the Eastern Orthodox realm to sweep aside the apostate Pope?

> Will Facra then be affirmed as a “recurrence of the Christ” by the fake ETs who show up?

The good news is we won’t have to wait long to find out the answers. Facra should make his presence known by July of next year.

For the entire prophecy series in its proper order, read through Obama and the 2nd Coming.

With love…