Author Archives: kenneth

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 12 – Don’t be fooled by globalist rebranding

[Update 12 – 25 January 2015]

How would you like a mouthful of Ayds?…

…Probably about as much as you want to be financially ruled by the IMF and the BIS, and the globalists know this.

When I was young, I remember seeing commercials for the weight loss chews pictured above. Their Wikipedia entry tells what happened to them…

“Ayds (pronounced as “aids”) was an appetite-suppressant candy which enjoyed strong sales in the 1970s and early 1980s…

By the mid-1980s, public awareness of the disease AIDS caused problems for the brand due to the phonetic similarity of names. While initially sales were not affected, by 1988 the chair of Dep Corporation announced that the company was seeking a new name because sales had dropped as much as 50% due to publicity about the disease. While the product’s name was changed to Diet Ayds (Aydslim in Britain), it was eventually withdrawn from the market.”

As you can imagine, the public formed negative associations with the name of the product, so the manufacturer recognized the need to change it. The problem was that they didn’t change it enough to get rid of the bad associations. As we head into the public debut of the multilateral / multipolar New World Order, it’s important to note that many of the globalist brands (such as the IMF and the Bank for International Settlements) have also garnered negative associations, so don’t be surprised if they move their offices and change their nameplates when the system resets.

If we look back to the 1988 Economist article “Get ready for the phoenix,” we see that it hints at the replacement of the existing IMF brand with something new…

So what will be the name of the new world central bank? They probably won’t call it “The Illuminati Central Bank” because they’ll want to avoid using words in the name that have bad associations in the public consciousness. Words like “global(ist),” “bank,” “central bank,” “authority,” etc. will likely be omitted and benign-sounding words will be used instead. The name might be “The New Monetary Council” or something along those lines.

As for other globalist entities, the Bank for International Settlements might be renamed something like “The Financial Coordination Council” and the UN’s World Bank might be folded into the BRICS-founded “New Development Bank” (which might explain why they left “BRICS” out of the name). If you think about it, how hard is it for the globalists to take the BIS and World Bank coversheets off of their reports and planning documents and replace them with new FCC and NDB coversheets? Not hard at all.

The replacement of tainted existing brands by fresh new brands extends beyond globalist organizations of course; it includes political figures as well. Many of the leaders people associate with the current crises (the scapegoats) will be swept aside by “heroic” controlled opposition figures who “saw it all coming” and could have prevented it “if only we’d had the power.”

As I’ve shown in previous entries, the globalists seem to be positioning the “right wing dissenters” to take the political stage after the transition. This is symbolically appropriate given the whole Left Hand/Right Hand approach of the “elite.” They use the Left Hand to cause chaos and destruction and the Right Hand to bring about order and construction. It is for this reason that they’ve carefully built-up a public image of foresighted/conscientious dissent for “right wing” figures like Marine Le Pen, Nigel Farage, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz. They have also done this for “left-winger” Elizabeth Warren, so she must have some role to play in bringing the “political left” into the fold after the transition.

All this being said, we are heading into the biggest mind f*ck that has ever been foisted upon the human race. The “elite” will be “changing the guard,” so expect them to make a big show of…

> “taking down the wrongdoers” (like they are in China right now). In reality, though, they are not taking down the corrupt; they are merely disposing of those who have outlived their usefulness or who “know where the bodies are buried.”

They might even make a show of scapegoating certain Western “elite” families that have become tainted in the public eye (such as the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers), but no real harm will come to them. That’s why disinfo agents like David Wilcock and Benjamin Fulford tell sob stories about how the Illuminati were abused as children (“so they shouldn’t be blamed for doing things they didn’t really want to do”) and suggest that the Illuminati face “truth and reconciliation commissions” rather than punitive criminal courts. The “elite” don’t mind having some of their Family members wear dark hats and play the fall guy, but they don’t want their Bloodline brethren actually harmed.

> “replacing corrupt institutions” (like I’ve explained in this entry). In reality, though, they’ll simply be moving their operations from one shell to another…

> and “building a fair economic system based on sound money.” In reality, though, you’ll find the asset/commodity backing of the new currencies to be more theoretical than actual, especially when it comes to “elite”-coveted gold.

According to a Chatham House (the Royal Institute of International Affairs, a globalist think tank / propaganda center) paper titled Adding Gold into the Valuation of the SDR, these are some methods the banksters might use to keep the gold securely in their hands…

…So good luck trying to trade an SDR or national treasury note for physical gold.

Like I’ve said many times before, any global solution to our problems is a globalist solution. There is no other group of people who have the organization and power to erect a global solution at this time. So no matter what they call the new institutions or who they say are behind them, just look at what the institutions actually do. If they centralize power over your life at the global level, they are your enemies, no matter how nicely they might treat you at first.

And with that, I’ll call it a day. For the previous updates in this series, click here. To see all the updates, visit the Globalist Agenda Watch category.

Love always…

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Updates 8-11 – George Soros, the dollar/renminbi peg, and the “Fed mistake”

[Update 8 – 22 January 2015]

With the globalists sipping champagne and nibbling caviar at the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, it’s no surprise to see preparatory propaganda for the coming “Fed mistake” being presented on the 22nd of January…

In this instance, former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers is preparing us for what is to come. According to the Telegraph article…

>>> The United States risks a deflationary spiral and a depression-trap that would engulf the world if the Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy too soon, a top panel of experts has warned…

“There is no confident basis for tightening. The Fed should not be fighting against inflation until it sees the whites of its eyes. That is a long way off,” he [Larry Summers] said, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Mr Summers said the world economy is entering treacherous waters as the US expansion enters its seventh year, reaching the typical life-expectancy of recoveries. <<<

So with his remarks, he is establishing an expectation for the end of the “recovery” and for the “mistake” the Fed will make this year. And after establishing that an “epochal deflationary crisis” will come if the Fed tightens money policy “too soon,” Christine Lagarde is then reported saying this…

>>> Mrs Lagarde said the IMF expects the Fed to raise rates in the middle of the year, sooner than markets expect. <<<

In other words, she is expecting the Fed to tighten monetary policy too soon.

The article also quotes Lagarde saying something that is interesting in light of the George Soros interview I’ve been writing about…

>>> “If the US is in a bad place, we are short of any engine at the moment, so I hope you are wrong,” said Christine Lagarde, the head of the International Monetary Fund. <<<

So if the US economic engine stops driving the world economy, which nation will take its place? According to the George Soros FT interview…

“China will emerge as the motor replacing the US consumer and, of course, it’s a smaller motor because the Chinese economy is much smaller. So the world economy will have less of a motor, so it will move forward slower than it has in the last 25 years. But China will be the engine driving it forward…”

Another thing that Soros mentions in the interview is the effect of China de-pegging the renminbi from the dollar. Given what happened with the Swiss franc and the euro this month, that is something else we should be watching for. Another form the “Fed mistake” could take is doing quantitative easing instead of raising rates, and that could trigger de-pegging like it did in Europe. I’ll cover this in another update.

[Update 9 – 23 January 2015]

Are Netanyahu and the Pope setting up a time window for war?

Two peculiar things I’ve watched pop up in the news are the planned US visits of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Pope Francis, both of whom are to give speeches before joint sessions of Congress this year.

When I first saw news of Netanyahu’s visit, his speech was scheduled for February 11 (2/11), but it has since moved to March 3 (3/3). And the Pope’s arrival in the US is scheduled for September 22 (9/22). These dates suggest that Judeo-Masonic mischief is afoot. But what sort of mischief?

If we look to the public personas of the two, Netanyahu is seen as a war hawk and the Pope as a peace dove, so this suggests we might be looking at a “war window”: two points in time that mark the beginning and end of a period of staged military conflict. According to some news reports, such as this one at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution…

…the Israelis and Republicans are doing an end-run around Obama which could possibly lead to war. Will the Pope then come to bring peace?

During any other year, I wouldn’t pay much mind to the two visits, but 2015 isn’t going to be like any other year.

I’ll keep an eye on this…

[Update 10 – 24 January 2015]

Congress may be waiting for “Fed Mistake” before passing audit bill

We’re nearing the end of January, and neither the mainstream media nor the Congress have been talking much about the “Audit the Fed” effort. The articles that have been trickling out of the MSM have appeared in local outlets, but they feature wording that’s worth noting. Here’s a snippet from a Raleigh News & Observer piece…

“Detractors from both major political parties are preparing legislation to rein in the powers of the Federal Reserve, moves that would test and potentially restrain its independence.

The proposals include ordering a broad audit of the central bank, including its secret policy making, and giving Congress the power to confirm or reject the president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, one of the most influential…

Since 1913, the Fed has used closed-door deliberations to conduct monetary policy, raising its benchmark interest rates when the economy gets too hot and inflation is a threat, and cutting them in a bid to spark activity when economic recovery loses steam.”

They are making a point of mentioning that the audit will cover the Fed’s monetary policymaking, which could be a hint that the legislation will be advanced when the Fed makes its big “mistake” with regards to monetary policy.

In the meantime, Sputnik (a newly branded Russian government propaganda outlet), is promoting Ron Paul and the endgame of the Fed audit maneuver…

…May God bless our elite-sponsored “hero,” Ron Paul. 🙂

[Update 11 – 24 January 2015]

George Soros, the dollar/renminbi peg, and the “Fed mistake”

So far this month, we have seen lots of drama coming out of the central banks. And amidst this drama, three notable precedents have emerged…

1) Central banks are making abrupt, market-shocking changes in policy direction.

As noted in Update 4, we have seen this in Switzerland, and we’ve also now seen it in Canada. If you haven’t heard what Canada did, have a look at this Economist article…

“THE Bank of Canada does not like to surprise the markets and usually signals changes to its benchmark interest rate well in advance. But on January 21st markets were shocked by the bank’s decision to drop the target for the overnight rate from 1% to just 0.75%.”

2) Central banks are lowering interest rates and doing quantitative easing.

Canada lowered its rate and the European Central Bank announced a 60 billion euro per month bond buying program.

3) A central bank has removed a currency peg.

The Swiss de-pegged their franc from the euro using the ECB’s anticipated quantitative easing as an excuse.

Looking at these three precedents, let’s have another look at the anticipated “Fed mistake.” So far, the expectation has been that it would take the form of the Fed raising their interest rates too soon and/or too much. But what would happen if they instead followed the precedents set by the other central banks?

Before answering this question, let’s look back at what George Soros said about the dollar and China’s renminbi back in 2009 (for more information on this interview, see George Soros and the elite’s China-fronted New World Order)…

From here: “Well, certainly a decline in the value of the dollar is necessary in order to compensate for the fact that the US economy will remain rather weak — will be a drag on the global economy.”

From here: “And basically the renminbi is permanently undervalued because it’s tied to the dollar.”

From here: “As long as the renminbi is tied to the dollar, I don’t see how the decline in the dollar can go too far.”

From here: Interviewer – “Do you think it’s possible to persuade China to allow the renminbi to become stronger?”

Soros – “I think that they would be… they have been agitating for it, so I would take them at their word…”

(Keep in mind that the Chinese are attempting to transition from an export-based economy to one based on domestic consumption, so an increase in the renminbi’s value would help with that.)

What Soros is implying with his statements is that the renminbi is like a helium balloon that naturally wants to go up (because of the “strength” of the Chinese economy and China’s vast commodity assets), and the dollar is like a weight that naturally wants to go down (because of the “weakness” of the US economy and the dollar’s diminishing use as the world’s reserve currency). So as long as the two currencies are tied together by the Chinese government’s dollar peg policy, the renminbi is weighed down by the dollar and the dollar is held up by the renminbi. If you untie the two, the balloon will rise and the weight will fall.

Now imagine this…

After making a big show of supposedly tapering and then stopping its quantitative easing, and after getting all the markets to expect an interest rate increase sometime in 2015, the Fed instead does the exact opposite and restarts QE (they would do this under the pretext that the QE from all the other central banks is making the dollar too strong and exports too expensive, thus threatening the US “recovery”). The Chinese, in turn, could use such a Fed move as the pretext for de-pegging their currency like the Swiss did. This could cause an abrupt dollar/renminbi currency move which could be greatly exacerbated if the Chinese also did one or both of the following:

1) Announce that in addition to depegging, they will start moving towards a gold backing for the renminbi.

2) Begin unloading large quantities of their US Treasury bonds using the excuse that the Fed is irresponsibly inflating away the value of China’s dollar holdings.

The ensuing currency shock could then give rise to a “multilateral solution” through the IMF.

This leaves us with three candidates for the “Fed mistake”…

1) The Fed goes against the flow of the other central banks and raises interest rates too much / too soon, thus causing a shock in the markets.

2) The Fed goes with the flow of the other central banks by reversing course and reinstituting QE, thus causing the Chinese to abandon their dollar peg.

3) The Fed does nothing, and after the speculative bubbles burst and sink the system, they get blamed for letting the bubbles grow too large on account of their too loose, too long monetary policy.

Get out the popcorn. This should be fun to watch.

For the previous updates in this series, click here.

The BRICS were the brainchild of Goldman Sachs

A commenter over on ascensionwithearth.com has brought the following summary article to my attention: The BRICS and the International Development System: Challenge and Convergence? from the Institute of Development Studies, a UK think tank. Here is an excerpt…

“The ‘BRICs’ acronym, in its most common usage, derives from a report to investors by Goldman Sachs’ analyst Jim O’Neill, signalling the new dynamic that four large countries; Brazil, Russia, India and China, were bringing to the global economy at the beginning of the new millennium.

A conclusion advanced in the Goldman Sachs report was that the BRICs should be included in the G7 as their macroeconomic significance increased in the decade to come.”

The “at the beginning of the new millennium” part must be why the globalists launched the G20 on the eve of the new millennium (the inaugural meeting was in December 1999). They brought the BRICS into the global governance system even before the actual alliance began to form in 2006 — even before the term “BRIC” was coined in 2001.

After looking into all this, I found the PDF of the 2001 O’Neill report on the Goldman Sachs website. It was through this report that the public was introduced to the BRIC concept…

…Here is what’s on the first page…

So Goldman Sachs’ Head of Global Economics Research originated the BRIC idea, and five years later, the four nations began to meet with each other. See George Soros and the elite’s China-fronted New World Order for more details on how the BRICS got started and how the G7 was superseded by the G20 in accordance with the recommendation offered in the Goldman Sachs paper.

Here is another excerpt from the Institute of Development Studies article…

“We look at this BRICS Summit process as part of the broadening of the global governance system created following the Second World War, in which United States (US) leadership and hegemony has been a vital element…”

And who are the ones behind “the global governance system created following the Second World War”? For the answer, have a look at China’s complicity in building the Rockefeller New World Order, in their own words, which gives a quick overview of the UN Complex and the Rockefellers’ role in helping create it.

And to see why “US leadership and hegemony” has been a “vital element” in broadening the global governance system, have a look at The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words, which shows how the globalists planned to lead the US into national suicide in order to give rise to the New World Order.

Much love…

George Soros and the elite’s China-fronted New World Order (Updates 1-3 – The BRICS were the brainchild of Goldman Sachs)

Behold the engine that is driving humanity into the New World Order, the G20…

…This picture was taken during their first summit, “The G-20 Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy,” which was held in Washington, D.C. two months after the Lehman Shock in 2008.

Almost a year later, FT conducted an interview of George Soros in which he subtly laid out the banksters’ post-crisis plan for ushering in the NWO. When a reader first passed me a link to the interview, though, I couldn’t believe my eyes. I thought it might be faked, so I did some checking on its authenticity and found out it was actually real. Here was George Soros — who is unquestionably a Western elitist even in the eyes of the most ardent Kool Aid drinker — speaking of using China to bring in the New World Order. But it just goes to show that the banksters have never really hidden what they’re doing; they just reveal it in dry interviews and insufferably bland policy papers while the public is distracted by an emotionally charged, easily understood “good guy” versus “bad guy” fairy tale.

According to this fairy tale, which is offered by both the mainstream media outlets and the overwhelming majority of alternative media sources, the US is in conflict with Russia, and a determined band of freedom fighting nations (the BRICS) are on a quest to free themselves from the evils of Western imperialism once and for all. Well isn’t that precious? It’s also a load of childish bullsh*t.

In reality, both the Western powers and the BRICS nations are working closely together through the G20 to bring in the Central Banking Cabal’s New World Order. Here are the nations of the G20 (the 20th “nation” is the EU), with the core Western powers circled in blue and the BRICS circled in red…

…Once their plans come to culmination, the world will be ruled by a multilateral / multipolar financial and political order that will feature China as the most prominent nation, supplanting the United States. But don’t take my word on this; take it straight from the gefilte fish-eating horse’s mouth…

Starting at the 9:26 mark of this video and continuing on into the second part, George Soros tells us why the globalists used China to bring in the NWO…

>>> I think this would be the time, because you really need to bring China into the creation of a new world order — financial world order. They are kind of reluctant members of the IMF. They play along, but they don’t make much of a contribution because it’s not their institution. Their share is not commeasurate — their voting rights are not commeasurate — to their weight. So I think you need a New World Order that China has to be part of the process of creating it, and they have to buy in. They have to own it the same way as I said the United States owns… the Washington consensus… the current order, and I think this would be a more stable one where you would have a coordinated policies. <<<

So he is saying that the way to bring the Chinese into the NWO is to have them help create it and to give them “ownership” of it. This is not a new idea, of course, since the Rockefellers hinted at this strategy back in 1961 in their NWO blueprint book Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reports…

…(from page 75) This is the entry I wrote about the book: The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words.

I also wrote about the globalists’ China strategy and their use of a dialectic problem / reaction / solution scenario in an entry titled David Wilcock and the Real NWO, Part 2 of 2…

>>> Problem – The evil Western power elite are out to steal everything and kill everybody!!! (The engineered truth movement has ensured that we got this message loud and clear.)

Reaction – People are both angry and fearful, and are longing to end the old system and start something new.

Solution – The angelic BRICS power elite swoop in on white unicorns to save the day and give us a new financial system and all the money people need. (The false-light crowd has ensured that we’ll look at our “saviors” in this light.)

Pondering this problem / reaction / solution scenario begs the question…

Why China? Why would the Illuminati, whose home base is in Western Europe, have the Chinese front the public face of their New World Order?

A clue to their motivations and strategy can be found in this article, titled “Colonial Elite Rules China for the Illuminati.” In it, the author states…

“The Chinese people would revolt against overt foreign domination, but embrace their place in the NWO if they believed they were in control.”

The Chinese have suffered greatly at the hands of Western imperialism, as has much of the world. As a result, the Illuminati would have trouble roping many nations into a Western-led New World Order, especially the nationalistic Chinese. Since you can’t have a truly global order without the most populous nation on Earth, the Illuminati opted to use their own legacy of destruction to their advantage. Their two-part strategy to do so is as follows:

1 – They set up a China-centered alliance as an opposing force to the Western alliance.
This part of the strategy was hinted at in the mainstream press in this 2002 UPI article, titled “China Wants Its Own ‘New World Order’ To Oppose US Version.” It is common practice for the Cabal to use opposing forces to achieve their ends, and they always make sure they have influence or control over both sides.

2 – They have been driving the world public into the hands of the Chinese alliance.
How have they approached this, you ask?

> They have widely publicized a heinous New World Order planned by the Western Powers while simultaneously publicizing a benign New World Order planned by China and its allies (thus establishing danger from one side and safety from another).

> They have instigated outrageous and provocative action, both economic and military, by the Western powers (this adds a new insight into the open-for-all-to-see Wall Street / City of London criminality and recent Western military boondoggles in Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and Syria).

> They have broadly exposed damaging information about Western nations, especially the US. This is the motivation behind WikiLeaks, Snowden, and a thousand smaller disclosures. And after Snowden outed the NSA’s activities to the general public, where did he run to hide? First to China (Hong Kong), then to Russia. So what is the psychological message? China and Russia (the BRICS alliance) is where you run for safety from the evil US, its Western allies, and all their horrible behavior.

It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap. <<<

Soros’ admissions effectively confirm all this. And if we look again at Prospect for America, it confirms this viewpoint as well. On page 60, it says this…

So the globalists, recognizing the resolve of the peoples of the world to “emerge rapidly and conclusively from the era of colonialism,” have graciously provided them with a mechanism to do so: the BRICS alliance. And when the G20-connected BRICS emerge as victors over the “insane” G20-connected Western powers, the peoples’ longsuffering desire will find satisfaction. They will finally be free from the uncomfortable grip of the banksters’ Left Hand so they can rest more comfortably in the snug embrace of the banksters’ Right Hand. Ain’t freedom grand?

[Update 1 – 21 January 2015]

Due to the complexity of this part of the entry, I’ll do an individual update for each section till the interview has been thoroughly covered. Expect frequent updates…

Soros points to the makings of the New World Order in the G20

From the 0:12 mark of the second video: “So I think you need a New World Order that China has to be part of the process of creating it, and they have to buy in. They have to own it the same way as I said the United States owns… the Washington consensus… the current order, and I think this would be a more stable one where you would have a coordinated policies. I think the makings of it are already there because the G20, in agreeing to peer reviews, effectively is moving in that direction.”

In the last sentence, Soros points to the makings of the New World Order being in the G20. And when he refers to them agreeing to peer reviews, he is talking about agreements reached at the second G20 Summit in September 2009 (a month before his interview with FT). According to the New York Times…

Later in the article, it goes on to say this…

>>> The ideas are not new, and there is no enforcement mechanism to penalize countries if they stick to their old habits. But for the first time ever, each country agreed to submit its policies to a “peer review” from the other governments as well as to monitoring by the International Monetary Fund. <<<

So here you have it: both “rich countries” (the West) and “fast-growing powerhouses” (the East) agreeing to a “far-reaching effort to revamp the economic system” and to oversight by the globalist-run International Monetary Fund (which is part of the United Nations complex). In other words, they agreed to join together to create the New World Order.

[Update 2 – 21 January 2014]

More on the G20 and the BRICS

Now that George Soros has told us that the G20 is an aspect of the nascent New World Order, let’s get to know the organization a little better. We’ll begin with Wikipedia (with my comments interjected as needed)…

>>> The Group of Twenty (also known as the G-20 or G20) is an international forum for the governments and central bank governors from 20 major economies. The members, shown highlighted on the map at right, include 19 individual countries—Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States—along with the European Union (EU). The EU is represented by the European Commission and by the European Central Bank.

The G-20 was founded in 1999 with the aim of studying, reviewing, and promoting high-level discussion of policy issues pertaining to the promotion of international financial stability. It seeks to address issues that go beyond the responsibilities of any one organization. Collectively, the G-20 economies account for around 85% of the gross world product (GWP), 80% of world trade (or, if excluding EU intra-trade, 75%), and two-thirds of the world population. The G-20 heads of government or heads of state have periodically conferred at summits since their initial meeting in 2008.

With the G-20 growing in stature after the 2008 Washington summit, its leaders announced on 25 September 2009, that the group would replace the G8 as the main economic council of wealthy nations. <<<

Take special note of the last passage. The G20 took over the G8’s role as the main globalist economic council back in 2009…

With this in mind, have a look at this CNN article titled U.S., other powers kick Russia out of G8…

So when Russia was kicked out of the G8 in early 2014 (supposedly over the staged conflict in Ukraine), it was a purely symbolic gesture designed to give some semblance of reality to the phony East versus West dialectic. The (now) G7 is just a sideshow; the real action takes place in the G20 (to which Russia still belongs).

Continuing on…

>>> The G-20 is the latest in a series of post-World War II initiatives aimed at international coordination of economic policy, which include institutions such as the “Bretton Woods twins”, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and what is now the World Trade Organization. The G-20 superseded the G33 (which had itself superseded the G22), and was foreshadowed at the Cologne Summit of the G7 in June 1999, but was only formally established at the G7 Finance Ministers’ meeting on 26 September 1999. The inaugural meeting took place on 15–16 December 1999 in Berlin. Canadian finance minister Paul Martin was chosen to be the first chairman and German finance minister Hans Eichel hosted the inaugural meeting.

According to researchers at the Brookings Institution, the group was founded primarily at the initiative of Eichel, who was also concurrently chair of the G7. However, some sources identify the G-20 as a joint creation of Germany and the United States. According to University of Toronto professor John Kirton, the membership of the G-20 was decided by Eichel’s deputy Caio Koch-Weser and then US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers’ deputy Timothy Geithner. In Kirton’s book G20 Governance for a Globalised World, he claims that:

“Geithner and Koch-Weser went down the list of countries saying, Canada in, Spain out, South Africa in, Nigeria and Egypt out, and so on; they sent their list to the other G7 finance ministries; and the invitations to the first meeting went out.”

Though the G-20’s primary focus is global economic governance, the themes of its summits vary from year to year… <<<

Isn’t it interesting that the G20’s inaugural meeting took place on the eve of the new millennium? And after the globalists triggered the 2008 financial crisis, they raised the G20’s stature by beginning to hold summit meetings…

>>> The G-20 Summit was created as a response both to the financial crisis of 2007–2010 and to a growing recognition that key emerging countries were not adequately included in the core of global economic discussion and governance. <<<

The Wikipedia entry also mentions the role of the Asian countries…

>>> A 2011 report released by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) predicted that large Asian economies such as China and India would play a more important role in global economic governance in the future. The report claimed that the rise of emerging market economies heralded a new world order, in which the G-20 would become the global economic steering committee. The ADB furthermore noted that Asian countries had led the global recovery following the late-2000s recession. It predicted that the region would have a greater presence on the global stage, shaping the G-20’s agenda for balanced and sustainable growth through strengthening intraregional trade and stimulating domestic demand. <<<

Putting all this together, we see that the Western nations haven’t been trying to keep the Eastern nations out of the New World Order; they have been enthusiastically inviting them in. And once they were all in league with each other, they turned their attention to herding the public into accepting the NWO. This is why they formed the BRICS alliance. But don’t take my word for it; look at what the Russian President’s Office has to say about it…

…Here is the full text of the page (with my comments interjected)…

>>> Cooperation within BRIC

BRIC is a loose group of countries including Brazil, Russia, India and China, the largest economic growth and political influence centres among emerging economies. These countries have a substantial integration potential in their respective regions… <<<

Consider what they mean when they say “substantial integration potential in their respective regions.” As I pointed out in the article on Prospect for America, the New World Order the Rockefellers and their fellow “elite” have planned is one based on regional groupings of nations…

Now think about the continents of the world:

In North America, the globalists have the US to lead the integration effort;
in Europe, they have the EU to lead the integration.

Now let’s add the BRICS…

In Eurasia (the middle part of the Europe/Asia landmass), they have Russia to lead the integration;
in Asia, they have China and India to lead the integration;
in South America, they have Brazil to lead the integration;
in Africa, they have South Africa to lead the integration.

It all fits in with the UN plan. Continuing on…

>>> The global problems of international terrorism and multinational crime, environmental degradation and climate change, plus food and energy security cannot be effectively solved without the involvement of the BRIC countries. <<<

Note how the Russian government is talking about terrorism and climate change as if they were real phenomena that weren’t purposefully stirred up / fabricated by the “elite.” In this, they are following the globalist problem / reaction / solution template.

>>> BRIC partnership is becoming increasingly important amid the global economic and financial downturn, when the four countries should coordinate their efforts with the international community to weather the crisis on global financial markets and reform the world financial system.

Political dialogue within the BRIC format began in New York in September 2006, when their foreign ministers conferred during the 61st UN General Assembly. <<<

So the BRICS started in the UN. No surprise there.

>>> Since then, the BRIC foreign ministers have met four times, including at a full-scale meeting in Yekaterinburg on May 16, 2008. The joint statement adopted as a result of the latter meeting formulated common approaches to crucial issues on the international agenda. <<<

So they got together for a full-scale meeting just months before the Lehman Shock in September 2008. Interesting timing. I will show you their joint statement after we finish with this one.

>>> Ties between the BRIC foreign ministers were completed by the meetings between their finance ministers in Sao Paulo, Brazil, on November 7, 2008 and in London on March 13, 2009. The finance ministers adopted joint statements on their meetings, which reflected common views of global economic problems, including the reasons for and ways to weather the global financial crisis.

At the initiative of Russia, the four leaders had a short meeting on July 9, 2008, during the G8 summit in Japan, to agree on drafting a full-scale BRIC summit. <<<

So they made plans for a full-scale summit just two months before Lehman.

>>> Official contacts in the BRIC format have been buttressed by interaction between the respective regional authorities and public organisations.

Russia would like the cooperation between the BRIC countries to become a major factor of multilateral diplomacy and to make a substantial contribution to promoting the nascent multipolarity and development of collective leadership by the world’s leading countries. <<<

Could this last statement be any more New World Orderish? But don’t take just the Russians’ word for it; have a look at what all the BRIC nations said after their Yekaterinburg meeting in 2008 (with my comments interjected)…

>>> The Joint Communique of the Meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, the Republic of India and the Federative Republic of Brazil
2008/05/16

The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) held their meeting in Yekaterinburg, Russia, on May 16, 2008.

The Ministers emphasized that the BRIC dialogue is based on mutual trust and respect, common interests, identical or similar views on pressing problems of global development and has bright prospects.

The Ministers agreed that building a more democratic international system founded on the rule of law and multilateralism is an imperative of our time. They pledged to work together and with other states to strengthen international security and stability and ensure equal opportunities for development to all countries.

The Ministers reiterated that today’s world order should be based on the rule of international laws and the strengthening of multilateralism with the United Nations playing the central role. <<<

Wouldn’t you know it, the BRIC nations called for a multilateral world order “with the United Nations playing the central role.” This is exactly as the Rockefellers designed it back in the 50’s…

…from page 26 of Prospect for America, and the following is from page 35…

…Now to continue with the communique…

>>> They reaffirmed the need for a comprehensive reform of the UN with a view to making it more efficient so that it can deal with the current global challenges more effectively. The Ministers of Russia and China reiterated that their countries attach importance to the status of India and Brazil in international affairs, and understand and support India’s and Brazil’s aspirations to play a greater role in the United Nations. <<<

Here they are talking about the “governance reforms” we’ve heard so much about in the past few years. Once the BRICS “heroes” take down the Western scapegoats, the globalists will make a big show of overhauling the UN Complex, including the IMF. They’ll do it to make it appear that “things really are changing.”

>>> The Ministers noted that sustainable development of global economy in the long-term as well as finding solutions to the acute global problems of our time, such as poverty, hunger and diseases are only possible if due account is taken of the interests of all nations and within a just global economic system. Among other issues they discussed the current global food crisis. The Foreign Ministers of Russia, India and China welcomed the initiative of Brazil to organize a meeting of economy and/or finance ministers of the BRIC countries to discuss global economic and financial issues.

The Ministers expressed their strong commitment to multilateral diplomacy in dealing with common challenges to international security. They reiterated their support for political and diplomatic efforts to peacefully resolve disputes in international relations. A cooperative approach to international security is required that takes into account the concerns of all and addresses them in a spirit of dialogue and understanding. The Ministers emphasized that disarmament and non-proliferation are mutually reinforcing. They also agreed on the need for multilateral efforts to prevent an arms race in the outer space.

The Ministers unequivocally condemned terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, committed for whatever purposes. They reiterated that terrorism constitutes one of the most serious threats to international peace and security and that the international community should take necessary steps to enhance cooperation to prevent and combat terrorism. They particularly highlighted the importance of the UN cooperation framework and the need for all member states to implement international conventions of the United Nations and UN Security Council resolutions on fighting terrorism.

The Ministers emphasized the importance of the implementation of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy in all its aspects and expressed their opinion that all member states should make concerted efforts towards expeditious finalization of a Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism at the UN. <<<

So according to the BRIC nations, what is the solution for globalist organized and funded terrorism? Implementing the policies of the globalist UN of course.

>>> The Ministers noticed a close interconnection between energy security, socio-economic development and environmental protection. They reaffirmed their commitment to the multilateral efforts aimed at reaching an optimum balance of interests between producers, transit states and consumers of energy resources. In this respect the parties emphasized the need for supporting energy programmes, such as programmes to increase access to energy, energy efficiency as well as the development and use of new and renewable sources of energy, including biofuels, which are compatible with sustainable development.

The Ministers spoke in favour of strengthening international cooperation to address climate change in the context of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. They expressed their desire to work closely together in order to carry out the Bali Action Plan. <<<

Here the BRIC nations are promoting the concept of human-induced global warming just like the carbon traders want.

>>> The Ministers spoke in favour of intensifying the dialogue to achieve the internationally agreed development goals, primarily the Millennium Development Goals [of the UN], on the basis of global partnership for development. They supported international efforts to combat hunger and poverty… [and so on…] <<<

As you can see from their own words, the BRICS are helping to bring about a UN-led New World Order. So if you are one of those who are still holding on to the illusion that they are your saviors coming to rescue you, what’s it going to take to wake you up? Should I beg?

Pretty please…
With sugar on top…
WTFU.

[Update 3 – 22 January 2014]

The BRICS were the brainchild of Goldman Sachs

This update can be found in this new article.

I send you my love…

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Updates 4-7 – George Soros openly talks of collusion with China in building the New World Order & Paul Craig Roberts confirms Le Pen, Farage, and Paul are controlled opposition

[Update 4 – 15 January 2015]

The Swiss National Bank and the “Fed Mistake”

If you’ve visited Zero Hedge this morning, you’ll know that the Swiss National Bank has made some sudden, unexpected changes in policy that have roiled the currency exchange markets as well as the Swiss export and tourism industries.

As this article notes…

“Just before lunch local time, the Swiss National Bank took on virtually every single macro hedge fund, the vast majority of which were short the Swiss Franc and crushed them, when it announced, first, that it would go further into NIRP, pushing its interest rate on deposit balances even more negative from -0.25% to -0.75%, a move which in itself would have been unprecedented and, second, announcing that the 1.20 EURCHF floor it had instituted in September 2011, the day gold hit its all time nominal high, was no more.”

Also mentioned is this outcome of the policy changes…

“However, the best soundbites today will surely come from US hedge funds which are just waking up to the biggest FX shock in years, and of course, any retail investors who may have been long the EURCHF, and who are not only facing epic margin calls, but are unable to cover their positions…”

So here we have yet another example of the Central Banking Cabal ripping off retail investors while simultaneously creating problems that can “only be solved by giving the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) more power over national central banks.” You can be certain that the central banksters and their traders were on the profitable side of the market moves this morning, because they, of course, knew what was coming. The international financial markets have never been anything but a rigged casino designed to extract wealth from the masses.

Another article notes the supposed cause of the SNB’s “shocking” changes…

“Removing the SNB peg takes out one of the biggest EUR buyers in the market. And of course, VERY notable this is happening 1-week ahead of the ECB, they possibly realised they could not continue to buy unlimited quantities when the ECB might print unlimited quantities.”

So the SNB’s actions are supposedly a preemptive measure against the expectation that the European Central Bank will print more money. This, then, is a case of market turmoil created by national central banks working at cross-purposes, which is exactly what the BIS is using as justification for centralized supranational control.

Yet another article shows this…

>>> From January 12, 2015:

The Swiss National Bank’s cap on the franc at 1.20 per euro will remain its key monetary policy tool, the central bank’s vice-chairman said in a television interview broadcast on Monday. “We took stock of the situation less than a month ago, we looked again at all the parameters and we are convinced that the minimum exchange rate must remain the cornerstone of our monetary policy,” Jean-Pierre Danthine told RTS.

From January 15, 2015:

Recently, divergences between the monetary policies of the major currency areas [translation: “national central banks working at cross-purposes”] have increased significantly – a trend that is likely to become even more pronounced. The euro has depreciated considerably against the US dollar and this, in turn, has caused the Swiss franc to weaken against the US dollar. In these circumstances, the SNB concluded that enforcing and maintaining the minimum exchange rate for the Swiss franc against the euro is no longer justified. <<<

So in just a few days, the SNB completely changed direction. This sets the stage for the Fed to do the same thing…

[Update 5 – 15 January 2015]

Enter Hyperbole

According to this USA Today article…

So what’s the solution? Wouldn’t you know it…

>>> What’s the Fed to do? George Selgin, senior fellow at the Cato Institute, is against any delay in the U.S. raising interest rates. Delaying, he warns, could lead to another asset price bubble that could pop and make a mess. David Wessel, director of the Hutchins Center on Fiscal and Monetary Policy at Brookings, says that getting the timing of the rate hike right is one “really tricky” issue to keep Yellen awake at night. It’s an art, not a science, and easy to mess up. Too early and recovery could be choked off. Too late and inflation could sap the Fed’s credibility. <<<

Needless to say, the Fed will get it wrong.

[Update 6 – 15 January 2015]

George Soros openly talks of collusion with China in building the New World Order

A reader has brought to my attention a 2009 FT interview of George Soros. At the 12 second mark…

…he drops this bomb…

“…So I think you need a New World Order that China has to be part of the process of creating it, and they have to buy in. They have to own it the same way as I said the United States owns… the Washington consensus… the current order…”

I’ve scanned both parts of the interview (here is Part 1), and they are chock full of reality checks for those who have bought-in to the East/West dialectic. I will be mining it for quotes and publishing a full article on its implications as soon as possible.

[Update 7 – 16 January 2015]

Paul Craig Roberts confirms Le Pen, Farage, and Paul are controlled opposition

The great thing about globalist disinfo agents is that once you identify them, they become a great source of insight into what the globalist agenda actually is. Whatever they are selling is what the globalists want sold, and whatever they are bashing is what the globalists want bashed. Discerning the underlying agenda then becomes child’s play.

Paul Craig Roberts is one such disinfo agent, and he is on the globalists’ “Team BRICS.” Team BRICS media agents are tasked with pointing out the (deliberately) insane policies of the US and the West and/or pointing out the hope offered by “freedom fighting” China and the East. Roberts is a particularly shrill propagandist who assails “insane” American policy.

On top of the clear propaganda signature offered by his writings and interviews, he makes a point of displaying the “Hidden Hand” gang sign of the “elite” on his webpage…

All this triggers “Ken’s Rule for Discerning Globalists”…

If it quacks like a dialectic propagandist, looks like a Hidden Hand, and smells like a vinegary fish, it’s a globalist douchebag.

Now have a look at what Roberts said in this King World News interview…

His promotion of “dissenters” like Marine Le Pen, Nigel Farage, and (by extension) Ron Paul tells us that the globalists want them promoted, just like I noted in these two entries…

Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags (and the real agenda behind the Paris attacks)

The Paris Attacks, Marine Le Pen and Ron Paul

And don’t be confused if these “dissenters” break up the EU. Just remember the quote attributed to Mayer Amschel Rothschild: “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws.” This concept extends to the global level as well. Once the globalists have locked the nations into the SDR-based, Chinese “owned” (as Soros puts it) multilateral/multipolar New Financial Order, they no longer have to hold together fragile combinations like the EU. New multilateral regional and functional institutions can rise from the ashes of the EU. Once the centralized money power has been secured, the rest is academic.

For the first three installments of this series, click here.

Ron Paul: Standing strong and telling it like it ain’t (Update 1 – Selective Truthing)

“We will lead every revolution against us”…

For any who might still be wondering if Ron Paul is a globalist-run controlled opposition figure, have a look at his new Lessons from Paris essay. Here are some key excerpts…

“After the tragic shooting at a provocative magazine in Paris last week, I pointed out that given the foreign policy positions of France we must consider blowback as a factor.”

In this essay, Paul is treating the Paris attacks like they’re real terrorist events conducted by real Muslim extremists as retaliation for France’s interventionist foreign policy. There is no mention whatsoever of the possibility that the attacks are a false-flag conducted by the globalist intelligence agencies. This is a stunning oversight considering what he goes on to say next…

“If Islamic extremism is on the rise, the US and French governments are at least partly to blame. The two Paris shooters had reportedly spent the summer in Syria fighting with the rebels seeking to overthrow Syrian President Assad. They were also said to have recruited young French Muslims to go to Syria and fight Assad. But France and the United States have spent nearly four years training and equipping foreign fighters to infiltrate Syria and overthrow Assad! In other words, when it comes to Syria, the two Paris killers were on ‘our’ side.”

By now, it is known to everyone with a brain stem that the globalist intelligence agencies are the ones behind recruiting, organizing, training, arming and funding Islamic extremists throughout the world. Even Paul admits this…

“Beginning with Afghanistan in the 1980s, the US and its allies have deliberately radicalized Muslim fighters in the hopes they would strictly fight those they are told to fight. We learned on 9/11 that sometimes they come back to fight us.”

Brainstem-equipped persons further know that the agencies move these mercenary assets to wherever they want to create trouble, and that includes the US and Europe. Notice that Paul doesn’t admit this. He instead implies that these young men “left the reservation” and did it all on their own out of anger over France’s foreign policy. There is no mention of even the possibility that the attackers were either intelligence assets or naive young ideologues being manipulated by agency handlers and deliberately tasked to conduct the attack. Note also how Paul applies the same argument to 9/11: it was no false-flag, just blowback from our own foreign policy.

“We have learned that the two suspected attackers had long been under the watch of US and French intelligence services. They had reportedly been placed on the US no-fly list and at least one of them had actually been convicted in 2008 of trying to travel to Iraq to fight against the US occupation. According to CNN, the two suspects traveled to Yemen in 2011 to train with al-Qaeda. So they were individuals known to have direct terrorist associations. How many red flags is it necessary to set off before action is taken? How long did US and French intelligence know about them and do nothing, and why?“

Isn’t the “why” obvious? The US and French intelligence agencies wanted the attack, but Paul won’t admit this. This leads one to wonder…

Is Ron Paul unaware of the concept of the false-flag attack and its role in statecraft?

Did he not notice how 9/11 was used to drive the population towards accepting the Patriot Act and the War on Terror? Will he now not notice where the globalists are driving the French population with the Paris attacks?

Why did he vote for the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists after 9/11?…

>>> Section 2 – Authorization For Use of United States Armed Forces

(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons. <<<

While pondering this question, have a look at this video in which We Are Change discusses 9/11 with Paul (starting at the 1:14 mark)…

In the video, Paul says this: “Well… you know… I’ve said many times that I don’t think the investigation did any more than cover up the truth…

…The big question is who’s behind it and what’s the motivation…

…[World Trade Center building] number 7 is the one that’s most suspicious…”

So in a private conversation, Paul admits something suspicious went on with 9/11, but his public statements about 9/11 and the other false-flags support the globalist propaganda line: that they’re real terrorist attacks, they’re done by radicalized Muslims, they’re blowback for our interventionist foreign policy, and they’re not false-flags.

The policy of the globalists is to deny 9/11 Truth until it’s time to unveil the “saviors.” At that point, they plan on hitting the public with a phony “Truth Tsunami” to bowl people over and get them thinking that things are really changing. As I noted in The Multilateral/Multipolar New World Order will seem like heaven… at first…

>>> The globalists are in the process of running a problem / reaction / SOLUTION scam on us, not a problem / reaction / PROBLEM scam.

This means that when we reach the end result of this transition process, the NWO will look like the SOLUTION to all our problems, not another PROBLEM (such as a dark, scary fascist regime) we need to overcome. It will appear as though the corrupt have been defeated, World War 3 has been stopped, all regional conflicts have been resolved, biowarfare against the population has been halted, poverty has been alleviated, debt money has been abolished, secrets have been revealed, and so on and so forth. And the masses, after having been force-fed negativity and conditioned to expect a scary NWO for so long, are expected to be so overcome with joy that they’ll willingly embrace the New Order. <<<

Once the Truth Tsunami begins, how will Ron Paul explain-away his failure to speak out about the false-flag nature of the attacks?…

“I was limited in what I could publicly say about 9/11 because they had threatened to kill me and my family.”

…or…

“I didn’t realize just how deep the corruption and treason ran until I saw all the classified information that has come out recently.”

We’ll find out as early as next year.

[Update 1 – 14 January 2015]

Selective Truthing

A reader has sent me some links that prove Ron Paul is familiar with the concept of the false-flag attack. This article shows that Paul specifically spoke out about the potential that a false-flag could be used to start a war with Iran…

From the 28:15 mark of this video: “What I fear the most is a false flag: something happening where one of our ships goes down, or there’s a plane goes down, and of course it had to be the Iranians, you know — for sure — for certain.”

And from the 1:24 mark of this video: “I am concerned, however, that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin type incident may well occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran.”

The article also notes that none other than Zbigniew Brzezinski also issued such a warning. Here is an excerpt from the Brzezinski link the article offers…

>>> A plausible scenario for a military collision with Iran involves Iraqi failure to meet the benchmarks; followed by accusations of Iranian responsibility for the failure; then by some provocation in Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a “defensive” U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a spreading and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. <<<

The reader also provided a link to this article which references the 1:40 mark of this video where Paul mentions that the infamous gas attack in Syria might be an Al Qaeda false-flag…

“We’re not really positive who set off the gas. I mean the group that’s most likely to benefit from that is Al Qaeda. They ignite some gas, some people die, and blame it on Assad.”

Seeing all this leaves us with some obvious questions:

Why would Ron Paul, Zbigniew Brzezinski and other globalist mouthpieces be warning about a false-flag against Iran?

Why would Ron Paul blow the whistle on false-flags in Iran and Syria while remaining silent on ones in New York, London, and Paris?

What’s the angle?

The answers to these questions are most interesting and quite revealing, so I will prepare a lengthy entry on the subject and try to release it on Monday. Barring any big unforeseen developments, there will be no further posts till then.

Much love…

The Paris Attacks, Marine Le Pen and Ron Paul

It didn’t take long for the propaganda exploitation to flow after the false-flag attacks on January 7. On the 8th, Slate posted this article on Marine Le Pen…

…Isn’t it interesting how they thought to write about this in the immediate aftermath of the attacks?

Here are some notable excerpts (with my comments added in brackets)…

>>> Marine Le Pen, the leader of the increasingly popular party with the slogan “The French Come First,” appeared in front of three French flags and hammered out her demands—and a selfless offer.*

It is time for “frank and clear responses” against “inaction and denial,” she declared. In other words: The country’s two main political parties have failed to stem the Islamist tide, and you the voters now have all the evidence you need that France requires new leadership. “I intend to assume this vital responsibility so France can defend itself in the war that has been declared upon her,” she continued…

After Wednesday’s tragic attack, the party’s relevance [Le Pen’s FN Party] can no longer be doubted…

Marine Le Pen’s challenge has been to dissociate her party from its founder, her father Jean-Marie Le Pen, a polarizing figure known for frequent racist and anti-Semitic commentary…

[In much the same way, Rand Paul has had to distance himself from the “extreme” stances of his father Ron, and Ron Paul has toned down his language to support his son’s political ambitions.]

Le Pen’s attractive force, however, does not rely on the logic of the political world as it is. It lies in the brand her father built as a political pariah speaking “truth to power” in a system dominated by Gaullists and Socialists who all attended the same elite schools.

[Here again we see the similarities to the Pauls — being “political pariahs” speaking “truth to power” to the “elite.”]

In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attack, there is no obvious limit to how high Marine Le Pen and National Front could rise. <<<

To further cement Le Pen’s reputation as an “outsider” to the French Establishment, she was noticeably snubbed from the recent National Unity March. As France 24 noted…

>>> By Thursday afternoon, most other parties had followed suit, with the notable exception of the National Front (FN). Its leader, Marine Le Pen, said she had not received an invitation. She denounced the FN’s “exclusion” from the rally and proclaimed “the end of national unity”.

The Socialist government has yet to confirm that her party was not invited. <<<

…and as the Irish Times noted…

>>> Mr Hollande is marching alongside his predecessor Nicolas Sarkozy, whom he defeated in the presidential election in 2012, providing a rare image of unity between the two rivals. All senior figures in Mr Sarkozy’s UMP are attending, as are the leaders of smaller parties on the left and right.

Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front, is not among them. Speaking after a meeting with Mr Hollande at the Élysée Palace this week, Ms Le Pen said the president didn’t invite her to the march and that she “regretted” this. <<<

It’s also worth noting who was pictured with French President Hollande in the March…

…Benjamin Netanyahu. This picture is going to come back and bite Hollande once the mainstream media is instructed to “tell the truth” about all the false flags and the Nazi/Zionist involvement in them. When the MSM start openly promoting the truth about 9/11, the London 7/7 attacks, and the Paris attacks, you’ll know the globalists are making their move.

On a numerological side note, do you remember Christine Lagarde’s strange remarks on the “magic 7”? I talked about them in The Globalists are accelerating the rollout of their new financial system. The London attacks were on 7/7/2005 (which is 7/7/7), and the French attacks started on January 7. Also, 2015 is the 7th year since the 2008 Lehman Moment. These numbers are worth keeping in mind.

Having looked at all this (along with everything we saw in the last entry), we see how the Paris attacks are serving to “move the herd” in the general direction of Le Pen, France’s savior-to-be.

Let’s not forget someone else who released a major political manifesto on the day after the attacks…

…This article got lots of attention over the last few days, including over 266,000 views (so far) on Zero Hedge alone. It is designed to make Paul look prescient once the fireworks get started, thereby cementing his reputation as “the one who saw it all coming and warned us.” This in turn would make him or his son the obvious choice as the one who can “set things right again.”

If you haven’t yet read it, first go back and read the “Leadership Marketing” section of this entry, then read the Paul statement. You’ll see how it is tailored to say everything the people have on their minds, thereby establishing the Pauls and their ilk as the solution to the problems the scapegoats (the Fed and its associated “Western elite”) have been causing.

If I have time, I’ll go through the statement and offer some commentary on it.

With love…

Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags

Have you noticed how all the recent false-flag “terrorist” and “lone gunman” attacks seem like they were planned by the Keystone Cops?…

…It is no accident that they are so easy to see through.

Back when I was covering the Boston Bombings in my first blog, I realized something fairly early on. I wrote about it on 18 April 2013…

>>> You’ll have to pardon me for having my standard “paranoid” thoughts, but this is just too easy. I’m left asking myself…

Did the Cabal really believe they could get away with such an old-school false-flag at a place where there would be thousands of people with digital cameras, camera phones, and instant access to global social media sites?

Is their OPSEC really so sloppy that they’d use the same crisis actors at different staged events?

Could this be part of the engineered “takedown” of the demonized Western secret societies so the glamorized Eastern secret societies can take the reins of power?

To put it plainly, did they intend for us to put this puzzle together? Is this a small, flashy illusion intended to draw us into the grander illusion at work in the background?

I will write more about this when the Boston event dies down. For now, and regardless of any ulterior agendas that are in play, this event is helping in the awakening of the general public, so I’ll continue to flow with it. <<<

Since then, there have been more false-flags, including many that appear to have been wag-the-dog theatrical productions staged with crisis actors. This being the case, you gotta ask yourself a few questions:

> Why would the globalist intelligence agencies stage false-flag attacks that are so sloppy that any regular jagoff with an internet connection (like me) can see the inconsistencies?

> Why would alt-media disinformation sites that are known to be globalist mouthpieces be pointing out all the inconsistencies to the public and openly labeling them false-flag attacks?

Cui bono? (Who benefits?)

As I noted in the excerpt above, these are the benefits the globalists accrue from such practices…

1) These blown false-flags help to wake the people up. Dramatic events like this get lots of attention, and as people eventually catch on to the inconsistencies between “the official story” and what actually happened, they start looking for answers. As I’ve written before, the current awakening was engineered by the globalists to facilitate the transition to the NWO. They can’t run a dialectic on the population until the public is awakened to the two sides (the “evil” West and the “good” East).

2) These events help to establish the credibility of the alt-media disinformation sites. As people begin to see the inconsistencies and look for answers, there is a whole cast of colorful alt-media characters waiting to provide them. And once the disinfo sites have established credibility with the newly awakening ones, they sell them the East versus West dialectic.

3) These events provide “evidence” of how “evil” the West is, thus supporting the East vs. West dialectic. If you watch whom the disinformation sites blame for the attacks, you get the usual suspects…

…the Nazis…

…and the Zionists…

…or as disinfo mouthpiece Benjamin Fulford calls them, the “Nazionists.” They are the bogeymen in this globalist fairy tale.

But the great thing about disinformation sites is that if you know how to correct for their spin, they also give you the real reasons behind everything. Take the Paris terror attacks of the past week for example. Veterans Today blurted out the real agenda behind them for everyone to see (in the VT article linked above)…

“One thing I missed in the original blog post: The timing of the Charlie Hebdo event was suspicious, not only because it closely followed Netanyahu’s threat that France was making a grave mistake by supporting Palestinian statehood and unleashed pre-scripted Zionist talking points against France’s pro-Palestine position……But also because the Zionists are panicking at the success of European anti-New-World-Order parties in general, and the French Marine LePen/Alain Soral/Dieudonné contingent in particular.”

Let me explain why I bolded that last section…

Once the globalists trigger the New Lehman Event and take down the West, the Western populations will be furious at their leaders. The globalists know this. This is why they’ve been preparing to scapegoat the existing political figures and replace them with pre-marketed “outsiders” who will “set things right again.”

If you’ve noticed, the Establishment has had existing leaders like America’s Obama and France’s Hollande force wildly unpopular policies upon the people, thus preparing the scapegoats for the slaughter. Now can you guess who they’ve been grooming as the “outsiders” who will replace these unpopular figures? In America, it is politicians like Ron Paul, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, and Elizabeth Warren. And in France, it is the “French Ron Paul“…

…This picture shows Jean-Marie Le Pen and his daughter Marine Le Pen, who are the French analogs to Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul.

So who will be the “British Ron Paul”? Nigel Farage?…

…(source)

In the same way that the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) have been positioning themselves to be the “wise supranational institution” that “saw it all coming” and “could have prevented it if only we’d had the power,” controlled opposition figures like Ron Paul and Marine Le Pen have been positioning themselves as the solution to the problems that now beset us.

Note what Marine Le Pen said about Ron Paul before she went to visit him in Washington in 2011…

>>> Le Pen specifically cited hopes of meeting Ron Paul, calling him “a great defender of an international monetary system anchored on the gold standard.” <<<

Bingo! Both she and Paul believe in an international monetary system with some sort of gold backing. And wouldn’t you know it — that’s exactly what the globalists have in store for us: an asset-backed, multilateral global financial system. 😉

Also note what Ron Paul’s office said about the meeting…

>>> Last month, Paul’s office had defended scheduling the meeting, with the Texas Republican’s spokeswoman, Rachel Mills, writing in an email, “Paul generally meets with foreign politicians and political leaders who request a meeting, particularly when they share his interest in monetary policy and the destructive nature of central banks.” <<<

Bingo! Who else is speaking out about the destructive policies of national central banks? The BIS, that’s who. The globalists plan on shutting down some (if not all) national central banks like the Federal Reserve and replacing them with the (globalist controlled) national treasuries (which will operate in concert with the global central bank, although they probably won’t label it a “central bank”). Keep in mind that when the G20 Central Banking Cabal hold their meetings, both the central bank heads AND the government finance ministers attend…

…They are all on the same page.

Here are more quotes from Marine Le Pen from after the meeting…

>>> Following the meeting — alternately described as “quick” by Miller and “very interesting; we spoke at length” by Le Pen — Le Pen praised Paul, and her own National Front, on their economic policies.

“He has been a visionary on this subject, as we have been visionaries on the economic crisis that today besets Europe,” <<<

Bingo! She and Paul have been “visionaries” who “saw it all coming,” just like the BIS.

>>> “I believe it was Einstein who said you cannot solve problems with those who caused them. So, in American political life as in French political life, it is more difficult to imagine that the people who contributed to causing the crisis, to accelerating it, would be able to SOLVE it,” Le Pen said. [all-caps added] <<<

Yahtzee! Problem / Reaction / Solution. Those who “contributed to causing the crisis” (like Obama and Hollande) must be replaced by the “visionaries” who “saw it all coming” and “could have prevented it if only we’d had the power.”

All this being said, the globalists want the awakening public to see the Paris attacks as false-flags conducted by the “Nazionists” in support of an evil Western agenda. This helps them wake people up to the East versus West dialectic, establish their disinfo purveyors as “the real truth tellers,” and provide evidence that the “evil West” must be stopped by the BRICS “freedom fighters.” It also helps them in their “leadership marketing” effort of replacing the current “incompetent” leaders with their controlled opposition counterparts (Paul, Le Pen, Farage, etc.).

Any questions?
(This is actually a rhetorical question, since I don’t really have the time to answer questions. 🙂 )

Much love…

Understanding the Different Brands of Alt-media Disinformation (Duff vs. Heneghan, OPPT vs. Swissindo vs. Neil Keenan vs. Karen Hudes, etc.) Update 1

When globalist puppets fight…

…the puppeteers are always on the winning side.

The G-20 Central Banking Cabal are very sophisticated in their disinformation techniques, but their methods are relatively easy to understand once you take a bird’s eye view of things. To elevate one’s self to such a view, the first thing that must be understood is this:

Just like GM employs different-looking brands to appeal to different demographics,
the globalists employ different disinformation brands for the same purpose.

Exactly how and why do they do this, you ask? Let’s go step-by-step…

1) The globalists have something to sell you: their East versus West, Good Illuminati versus Bad Illuminati global dialectic. They are trying to sell it to you so you’ll see their new multilateral/multipolar NWO and financial system as godsends rather than scourges.

2) They know that you can’t use the same salesman and same sales pitch with every person. Due to differences in personality types, personal experiences, levels of awareness, prejudices, etc., you have to match the right salesman and pitch to each “consumer.” In other words, you must tailor the bait you use to the type fish you’re trying to catch.

3) This being the case, the globalists deploy/develop a variety of disinfo agents who offer different sets of information and different spins to attract different types of people. Some of these talking heads are paid shills who know exactly what they’re doing; others might be well-intentioned bloggers who “got noticed” and were subsequently contacted by “insiders” who fed them bad information and influenced their outlook (I know this happens because they’ve tried to do it to me).

4) Since no two disinfo agents offer the same exact version of the lie, they frequently get into conflicts with each other, both real and staged. These conflicts actually serve the propaganda effort in the following ways:

> They create the impression that the disinfo agents aren’t working for the same people. If they’re fighting with each other, they can’t be on the same side, right? Wrong. Just look at the Republicans and Democrats.

> When disinfo agents fight over BS like the “global collateral accounts,” they distract people from questioning whether the accounts actually exist and instead get them focused on who is providing the “real intel” about them. If all these guys are fighting over something, that something must be real, right? Wrong. I have no doubt the Illuminati have vast stockpiles of gold scattered about, but it was gathered for their benefit, not humanity’s. They might try to tell you that it belongs to all of us, but they are the ones holding the keys to the vaults.

To show you what I mean by all this, consider Veterans Today and Tom Heneghan. If you are predisposed to see the Zionists as the source of the world’s ills, the globalists have Gordon Duff and Veterans Today to tell you what you want to hear. This is from VT’s front page today (the “bad guys” are in boxes and the “good guys” are circled)…

But if you are able to see through Duff’s bullsh*t, the globalists have Tom Heneghan there to catch you (and to blame everything on the Paperclip Nazis)…

Despite their supposed differences and staged conflict, the bottom line for both Duff and Heneghan is that Western ideological factions are to blame for what’s going on in the world. And that is what the globalists want to sell you.

Of course, VT also markets the saviors the globalists are selling…

And Heneghan offers a well-known globalist douchebag as the savior…

…Mr. Manmade Global Warming / Carbon Tax / Carbon Trading himself…

…Note the time and date of the article. The Skull and Bones “322” / Masonic “22” are featured, and it was the same day these two were meeting…

…They do enjoy their silly little numbers, don’t they? 🙂

While we are on this subject, take a look at something I wrote in my old blog. It is about how the globalists do “leadership marketing”…

In another old entry, I touched on the concept of Cabal dialectics and brand marketing as it relates to spirituality…

[Update 1 – 9 January 2015]

The part of this article about the OPPT, Swissindo, Keenan and Hudes is growing into a full-sized entry, so I’ll post it as “Part 2” in the next day or two. Until then, I thought I’d repost something I posted back on 4/21/2014…

>>> Tom Heneghan: “International Intelligence Expert” and Cabal Disinfo Hack

During this morning’s infoscan, I came across a Tom Heneghan article which features this photo…

Right away, I noticed two things:

1) The photographic clarity of LaVey’s face and Kerry’s face seems different.

2) The upper right of the “newspaper” is folded-over so you can’t see the date of the “article.”

Upon looking into this, I found that the photo has already been written about in a Web Urbanist article titled Politics of Photoshop: 15 Shady Edits for Political Purposes. The article features this collage which seems to show the source photos from which the fake photo was assembled…

…According to this analysis of the fake photo, it is a composite made from a photo of John Kerry meeting a clown named Rami Salami and a photo of Anton LaVey with musical artist Marilyn Manson. This begs the question…

If Tom Heneghan is an “international intelligence expert,” why can’t he handle a simple vetting of a photograph? I’m just a home health aide, and I managed to pull it off.

So does this mean I think John Kerry isn’t a bad man? Absolutely not. But I’ve long considered “Tom Heneghan” to be a disinformation source, and this offers a nice, clear example of why. <<<

For more information on his counterparts, Gordon Duff and Leo Wanta, just visit my Veterans Today category.

Love always…

RedefiningGod.com

A Resource for the Awakening Human

Author Archives: kenneth

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 12 – Don’t be fooled by globalist rebranding

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Updates 8-11 – George Soros, the dollar/renminbi peg, and the “Fed mistake”

The BRICS were the brainchild of Goldman Sachs

George Soros and the elite’s China-fronted New World Order (Updates 1-3 – The BRICS were the brainchild of Goldman Sachs)

Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Updates 4-7 – George Soros openly talks of collusion with China in building the New World Order & Paul Craig Roberts confirms Le Pen, Farage, and Paul are controlled opposition

Ron Paul: Standing strong and telling it like it ain’t (Update 1 – Selective Truthing)

The Paris Attacks, Marine Le Pen and Ron Paul

Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags

Understanding the Different Brands of Alt-media Disinformation (Duff vs. Heneghan, OPPT vs. Swissindo vs. Neil Keenan vs. Karen Hudes, etc.) Update 1