Paris has been attacked for the second time this year. Cui bono?…

…The globalists’ “anti-establishment” controlled opposition figures, that’s who.

The above-pictured article is from The Guardian, and take note of its date: 20 October 2015. So even though the supposed offense occurred 5 years ago, Le Pen wasn’t tried until just weeks before today’s attack. Convenient timing, is it not? While she is standing trial for “daring to speak the truth about the Muslim invasion,” the “Muslims” are running wild in the streets and shooting up Paris. Can you see how she is being positioned as the “suppressed patriot who spoke out against the insane policies of the political elite”? This is done so the public — who feel like suppressed patriots themselves — will identify with her and back her.

As we ponder this further, let’s take stock of two things we know…

1) The globalists are the ones forcibly holding the door open for immigrant invasions of the US and Europe.

2) The globalist intelligence agencies are the ones recruiting, training, arming, funding and transporting “Muslim terrorists” throughout the world.

So why are they doing these things? To create increasing public tension over the disruptive presence of the immigrants, and then unleash that tension with immigrant-linked false flag attacks. The released tension will then be channeled through the controlled opposition figures to create movement towards New World Order goals. I wrote about this in The Illuminati strategy of tension and release.

And here is something I wrote after the last round of Paris attacks in January (from The Paris Attacks, Marine Le Pen and Ron Paul)…

BEGIN EXCERPT >>>

It didn’t take long for the propaganda exploitation to flow after the false-flag attacks on January 7. On the 8th, Slate posted this article on Marine Le Pen…

…Isn’t it interesting how they thought to write about this in the immediate aftermath of the attacks?

Here are some notable excerpts (with my comments added in brackets)…

>>> Marine Le Pen, the leader of the increasingly popular party with the slogan “The French Come First,” appeared in front of three French flags and hammered out her demands—and a selfless offer.*

It is time for “frank and clear responses” against “inaction and denial,” she declared. In other words: The country’s two main political parties have failed to stem the Islamist tide, and you the voters now have all the evidence you need that France requires new leadership. “I intend to assume this vital responsibility so France can defend itself in the war that has been declared upon her,” she continued…

After Wednesday’s tragic attack, the party’s relevance [Le Pen’s FN Party] can no longer be doubted…

Marine Le Pen’s challenge has been to dissociate her party from its founder, her father Jean-Marie Le Pen, a polarizing figure known for frequent racist and anti-Semitic commentary…

[In much the same way, Rand Paul has had to distance himself from the “extreme” stances of his father Ron, and Ron Paul has toned down his language to support his son’s political ambitions.]

Le Pen’s attractive force, however, does not rely on the logic of the political world as it is. It lies in the brand her father built as a political pariah speaking “truth to power” in a system dominated by Gaullists and Socialists who all attended the same elite schools.

[Here again we see the similarities to the Pauls — being “political pariahs” speaking “truth to power” to the “elite.”]

In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attack, there is no obvious limit to how high Marine Le Pen and National Front could rise. <<<

To further cement Le Pen’s reputation as an “outsider” to the French Establishment, she was noticeably snubbed from the recent National Unity March. As France 24 noted…

>>> By Thursday afternoon, most other parties had followed suit, with the notable exception of the National Front (FN). Its leader, Marine Le Pen, said she had not received an invitation. She denounced the FN’s “exclusion” from the rally and proclaimed “the end of national unity”.

The Socialist government has yet to confirm that her party was not invited. <<<

…and as the Irish Times noted…

>>> Mr Hollande is marching alongside his predecessor Nicolas Sarkozy, whom he defeated in the presidential election in 2012, providing a rare image of unity between the two rivals. All senior figures in Mr Sarkozy’s UMP are attending, as are the leaders of smaller parties on the left and right.

Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right National Front, is not among them. Speaking after a meeting with Mr Hollande at the Élysée Palace this week, Ms Le Pen said the president didn’t invite her to the march and that she “regretted” this. <<<

It’s also worth noting who was pictured with French President Hollande in the March…

…Benjamin Netanyahu. This picture is going to come back and bite Hollande once the mainstream media is instructed to “tell the truth” about all the false flags and the Nazi/Zionist involvement in them. When the MSM start openly promoting the truth about 9/11, the London 7/7 attacks, and the Paris attacks, you’ll know the globalists are making their move.

On a numerological side note, do you remember Christine Lagarde’s strange remarks on the “magic 7”? I talked about them in The Globalists are accelerating the rollout of their new financial system. The London attacks were on 7/7/2005 (which is 7/7/7), and the French attacks started on January 7. Also, 2015 is the 7th year since the 2008 Lehman Moment. These numbers are worth keeping in mind.

Having looked at all this (along with everything we saw in the last entry), we see how the Paris attacks are serving to “move the herd” in the general direction of Le Pen, France’s savior-to-be.

<<< END EXCERPT

Since we can expect to hear a lot out of the alternative press as they pick apart the attacks, you might want to read this entry if you haven’t already: Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags (and the real agenda behind the Paris attacks). I also expect some alternative sources to connect the current attacks to what happened to the Knights Templar back in 1307, so I’ll write a postscript about that this weekend.

[Addendum 1 – 14 November 2015] – Bingo…

…From Zero Hedge

[Addendum 2 – 14 November 2015] – Leaders have already begun arriving for the G20 Summit in Turkey, and as one would expect, terrorism has now vaulted to the top of the agenda…

…Isn’t it interesting that this attack occurred just 2 days before a Summit that will take place in Turkey, just 500 km or so from ISIS territory in Syria?

So are we looking at the beginning moves toward a UN-centered Patriot Act for the world? Will we see the BRICS chiding the West over their “blowback-generating” interventionist foreign policies? What kind of show will they put on, a cooperative love-in or a breakdown between West and East? The propaganda arising from this meeting could tell us much about how 2016 will play out.

[Addendum 3 – 14 November 2015] – Here is another effect of the attacks that just occurred to me: they could be used as a pretext to block any protests at the Paris Climate Change Summit at the end of the month. From the globalist perspective, this reason alone makes conducting the attacks worthwhile.

[Addendum 4 – 14 November 2015] – Alex Jones shills for Le Pen

Have a listen at what Alex says about the Paris attacks and Marine Le Pen…

So he is precisely following the globalist media strategy of bashing the Western decoy NWO in order to mask the fact that the BRICS are bringing in the REAL NWO. This is why he sounds so sympathetic to Le Pen and is always so supportive of Putin, who are allies…

…From Yahoo/AFP

Looking ahead to the Climate Change Summit, I’m increasingly wondering if Putin will be “the hero who stops the deal.” If so, look for Alex Jones to lavish praise on him (and for the globalists to escalate staged attacks against him). It would be the trigger that touches off the final dialectic battle between West and East over the course of 2016.

[Addendum 5 – 15 November 2015] – The Knights Templar

Given that the Paris attack occurred on Friday the 13th, I knew that the fringe faux-truther sites would try to tie it into what happened to the Knights Templar and attribute it to internecine conflict within the secret societies. The notorious disinformation figure “Sorcha Faal” did not disappoint in this regard…

>>> A stunning new report issued today by the Ministry of Defense (MoD) to the policy makers of the Security Council (SC) states that yesterdays attacks in Paris can be likened to a “ritual massacre” and was “orchestrated/directed” by a secretive “element/cabal” of Freemasons (Masonic/Masons) holding high positions of power within the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the French General Directorate for External Security (DGSE), the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS/MI6), Israel’s Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) and the Vatican…

The significance of these Freemason-Jesuit plotters exacting yesterday’s Friday the 13th massacre on Paris, this report explains, is due to their secretive organizations banishment, arresting and outlawing of all of their members on Friday the 13 October 1307 against their declaration of innocence, and the subsequent burning at the stake of their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay, outside of the Notre Dame Cathedral seven years later on Friday 13 March 1314…

As the [Russian] Federation, since 30 September, has been bombing the Islamic State and its terrorist allies into oblivion, the greatest fear of these Jesuit-Freemason plotters, this report warns, is that their not so secret support of these barbarians with weapons and resources will become more apparent to the world unmasking these monsters and revealing who they really are—and with that what their global agenda is too. <<< – From WhatDoesItMean.com

Can you see how this make-believe narrative lends credence to the fake East versus West paradigm (with the “evil” Western Cabalists scheming against the “innocent” Russian Federation)? In reality, the East/West conflict is nothing more than a propaganda exercise featuring the West as the “bad cop” and the East as the “good cop.” The evil-looking bad cop’s NWO will be defeated by the smiley-faced good cop’s NWO because that’s what the globalists have been planning for all along.

As for what happened to the Knights Templar so long ago, have a look at what Wikipedia says about it…

>>> In 1305, the new Pope Clement V, based in Avignon, France, sent letters to both the Templar Grand Master Jacques de Molay and the Hospitaller Grand Master Fulk de Villaret to discuss the possibility of merging the two Orders. Neither was amenable to the idea, but Pope Clement persisted, and in 1306 he invited both Grand Masters to France to discuss the matter. De Molay arrived first in early 1307, but de Villaret was delayed for several months. While waiting, De Molay and Clement discussed criminal charges that had been made two years earlier by an ousted Templar and were being discussed by King Philip IV of France and his ministers. It was generally agreed that the charges were false, but Clement sent the king a written request for assistance in the investigation. According to some historians, King Philip, who was already deeply in debt to the Templars from his war with the English, decided to seize upon the rumors for his own purposes. He began pressuring the Church to take action against the Order, as a way of freeing himself from his debts. The French king’s motivations went beyond merely financial though.

At dawn on Friday, 13 October 1307 (a date sometimes linked with the origin of the Friday the 13th superstition) King Philip IV ordered de Molay and scores of other French Templars to be simultaneously arrested. The arrest warrant started with the phrase: “Dieu n’est pas content, nous avons des ennemis de la foi dans le Royaume” [“God is not pleased. We have enemies of the faith in the kingdom”]. Claims were made that during Templar admissions ceremonies, recruits were forced to spit on the Cross, deny Christ, and engage in indecent kissing; brethren were also accused of worshiping idols, and the order was said to have encouraged homosexual practices. The Templars were charged with numerous other offences such as financial corruption, fraud, and secrecy. Many of the accused confessed to these charges under torture, and these confessions, even though obtained under duress, caused a scandal in Paris. The prisoners were coerced to confess that they had spat on the Cross: “Moi, Raymond de La Fère, 21 ans, reconnais que [j’ai] craché trois fois sur la Croix, mais de bouche et pas de cœur” (free translation: “I, Raymond de La Fère, 21 years old, admit that I have spat three times on the Cross, but only from my mouth and not from my heart”). The Templars were accused of idolatry and were suspected of worshipping either a figure known as Baphomet or a mummified severed head they recovered, amongst other artifacts, at their original headquarters on the Temple Mount that many scholars theorize might have been that of John the Baptist, among other things. <<<

Looking at the things the Templars were accused of, it reads an awful lot like what our current-day bankster “elite” do on the weekend, doesn’t it?

[Addendum 6 – 15 November 2015] – Upon looking over the first MSM propaganda reports coming from the G20 Summit, the first hint of West/East dissension has appeared. This is from a BBC report titled G20 summit: Russia Syria action ‘raising refugee numbers’, and it features comments from European Council President Donald Tusk…

…Note Obama’s expression. It’s quite a nice little theatrical touch.

Tusk’s comments are, of course, idiotic and inflammatory, and that’s exactly what the directors of this drama want: the West looking like duplicitous, insane morons and Putin looking like the mature, truth-telling statesman.

[Addendum 7 – 15 November 2015] – No protests for you!…

Bingo again. the MSM are reporting France’s Hollande wants 3-month state of emergency: political sources. This likely means that no mass protests will be allowed during the Climate Change Summit. If any protests are permitted, they’ll almost certainly be restricted in size and contained in “protected free speech zones” out of sight and out of mind. I don’t think the globalists want the public seeing any opposition to their climate change message. But what will happen to the pro-climate control marches?

[Addendum 8 – 15 November 2015] – The West tells Putin to back down

The Guardian is reporting that…

So this is how the globalist script for Syria is shaping up so far…

1) The Western bad guys will try to get Putin to abandon Assad and stop bombing “moderate Syrian opposition forces” / Western regime change forces.

2) Good guy Putin will stand firm with his ally, insisting on the following: 1) that Assad remains in power until new elections are held, and 2) that Assad remains eligible to run for the Syrian Presidency in those elections.

3) With good guy Putin holding off the evil Western schemes for Syria, and with ever more warplanes in the sky over Syria due to the Paris attacks, an “accident/incident” will occur that leads to a direct military confrontation between Russian and Western forces. Incident by incident, skirmish by skirmish, World War 3 will grow over the following months.

[Addendum 9 – 15 November 2015] – The Pope, ISIS, and the “End Times”

I ran across this rather surprising article today…

…From Breitbart

And that article brought to mind something a reader mentioned a while ago…

…From The Blaze. Here is a rather interesting snippet from the article: “Bergen said that the terror group has an ideology of an ‘apocalyptic cult that believes that we are living in the end times and that ISIS’ actions are hastening the moment when this will happen.'”

ISIS’ strategy has been to take over areas mentioned in the End Times prophecies, then draw the “Satanic forces” into battle in those places. In this, they have been quite successful, haven’t they? They’ve brought both sides of World War 3 into the Syrian battlespace, and all that’s needed now is the right trigger to set things off.

Keeping in mind that the globalist intelligence agencies control ISIS (and that the globalist bosses control both West and East), remember that this is all just a script that’s being played out for public consumption. The public have to be given reasons why they’re going to war, and as usual, those reasons are entirely made up.

Speaking of the “End Times” and “Jesus’ return,” you might want to read Obama and the 2nd Coming to prepare yourself for any religious craziness you might see unfold next year.

[Addendum 10 – 16 November 2015] – East versus West on Climate Change

According to a Bloomberg Business article titled As Terrorism Unites G-20, Climate Change Exposes Divisions…

>>> The divide at the G-20 initially emerged over whether countries will back a more “differentiated” approach, where developed nations carry an extra burden, or “shared” emissions responsibilities, which would require developing nations to make bigger cuts, according to officials who asked not to be named…

The BRICS nations called for a greater focus on emissions pledges to be “differentiated” based upon national circumstances, suggesting they favor industrialized nations doing more to limit emissions than developing ones. <<<

This last paragraph is in keeping with Putin’s reported skepticism on manmade climate change: Putin Believes Global Warming ‘Is A Fraud To Restrain Developing Nations’. So this argument over “differentiated” measures versus “shared” measures might end up being the reason cited for Putin’s potential blocking of a climate deal at the upcoming summit.

In addendum 3 of this update I asked, “What kind of show will they put on, a cooperative love-in or a breakdown between West and East?” Looking at the back-and-forth over Syria and Climate Change, it appears that this G20 Summit is being used to demonstrate the (phony) conflict between the West and East. Should the BRICS be seen as frustrating the West on both Syria and Climate Change, it will set the stage for more provocative actions by the “insane West.”

[Addendum 11 – 17 November 2015] – Cue the Russian intensification

The globalist choreography of the whole Syrian conflict is getting ridiculously obvious. The MSM are now reporting Russia Says Bomb Downed Plane in Egypt and Intensifies Attacks on ISIS. So after dragging their heels for weeks over what caused the plane crash, and on the day after the G20 Summit ends, the Russians finally announce it was a bomb. Nothing fishy about that timing, eh?

So now we have both West and East intensifying airstrikes in Syria, putting more and more aircraft in that small piece of airspace. All that’s needed now to get the ball rolling is…

1) one angry pilot,
2) one false-flag downing of a warplane by the Armageddon-desiring religious wingnuts who run Israel,
3) one attempt by the West to impose a no-fly zone over Syria to protect their regime change forces from Russian airstrikes, or
4) one publicly-released smoking gun connecting the Western intelligence services to the airliner bombing.

[Addendum 12 – 17 November 2015] – Another covert US attack against China?

If you want to know why this happened in China on the day after the G20 Summit…

…From Zero Hedge

…then have a look at this section on climate change from the G20 final communique…

“We underscore our commitment to reaching an ambitious agreement in Paris that reflects the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in light of different national circumstances.”

Looking back to Addendum 10 of this update, we recall that the “bad cop” West wants “shared” emissions responsibilities (with all nations cutting equally) and the “good cop” East wants “differentiated” responsibilities (with the developed world cutting more). The fact that the word “differentiated” appears in the G20 communique tells us that the BRICS didn’t give in to the West on climate change, just like Putin didn’t give in on the matter of abandoning Assad and stopping strikes on Western regime change forces in Syria.

So what does this have to do with a chemical plant explosion, you ask? The recent rash of chemical explosions in China are already being cast by the fringe alternative media as covert attacks by the US against China…

…From Natural News

The basic gist of the propaganda line such sites are conveying is that the US “unipower” is trying to intimidate China with these “attacks” in order to maintain America and the dollar’s “hegemony” over the world. So according to such a narrative, today’s chemical explosion in China was retaliation for not giving in to the West’s demand for “shared” climate change responsibilities. Although this covert attack meme is limited to the fringe media right now, look for it to make its way into the mainstream when the BRICS finally make their big move. It will be used to justify Chinese military action, and It’s all part of the fake East versus West dialectic conflict that will bring in the NWO.

[Addendum 13 – 17 November 2015] – Are the Russians intensifying their attacks on Western regime change forces?

On the same day Russia announced that their jetliner was downed by a bomb, they struck those responsible with a massive 25 bomber air raid. But at whom were they aiming? Have a look at what this Daily Beast article says…

>>> “During a massive airstrike today, 14 important ISIL targets were destroyed by 34 air-launched cruise missiles,” [Russian General] Gerasimov said, using an alternative acronym for the terror army. “The targets destroyed include command posts that were used to coordinate ISIL activities in the provinces of Idlib and Aleppo, munition and supply depots in the northwestern part of Syria.”

Idlib and Aleppo are not ISIS strongholds. Indeed, U.S.-backed rebels hold much of both provinces. Russia has maintained all along that its roughly six-week-old intervention in Syria is aimed at defeating ISIS, but in fact many Russian air and missile strikes have hit rebel groups that oppose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and ISIS. <<<

So on the day after the G20 Summit, during which the West told Putin to back down due to the airliner bombing and Paris attacks (see Addendum 8), the Russians launch a massive strike on what might actually be the “anti-Assad rebels.” If the Russians are indeed massively increasing their attacks against the “moderate opposition fighters” / regime change forces, what do the globalists have scripted as the Western response? An attempt at imposing a Western-enforced no-fly zone? You can imagine what that would lead to.

For the previous updates from this series, click here.

Love always…

[Update 85 – 9 November 2015]

THE FED RATE HIKE, THE CLIMATE CHANGE SUMMIT, AND VLADIMIR PUTIN

Looking ahead, there are two scheduled timeframes for globalist mischief remaining this year…

1) There is the November 15-16 timeframe of the G20 Leaders Summit (which I’ll write about in a later update), and

2) There is the December 11-16 timeframe that features the final day of the Paris Climate Change Summit (on the 11th), the budget deadline for the US government (on the 11th), and the next FOMC statement on interest rates (on the 16th).

Speaking of that last one, a reader pointed out that the December rate announcement will occur EXACTLY 7 YEARS after they set the rates to their current low level…

…From CNN Money

Given the globalists’ affinity for the Magic 7, and noting the tenor of the propaganda surrounding the December FOMC meeting…

…there is a good chance that we’ll finally see the Fed zig (by tightening) while the rest of the world zags (by loosening).

With a tightening at the Magic 7 mark, the Fed will start a cascade of debt defaults by nations, companies, and individuals that cannot afford to roll over their dollar-denominated debt at a higher interest rate. The squeeze this will put on the “emerging market” nations will drive an increasing move away from the dollar and towards the BRICS, and this will provide a great way to herd the world towards the SDR-based multilateral financial system the globalists have been constructing.

Needless to say, the Fed would have difficulty justifying the raising of rates if the US government were shut down. So this suggests that a December 11 shutdown either won’t happen or will be very short (lasting only a few days). If the globalists do go ahead with a short shutdown (to make the US government look dysfunctional to the rest of the world), the press will suggest that it was due to a deal made between House Speaker Paul Ryan and the House Freedom Caucus. They’ll say that Ryan offered them a chance at a December shutdown if they didn’t oppose the debt limit extension. Congress would then swiftly bypass the shutdown before the FOMC meeting.

Looking at the Paris Climate Change Summit, something quite interesting is happening. Note that Putin will be speaking at the meeting (in green), but also note that the press is portraying him as a global warming skeptic (in red)…

This raises an intriguing question…

Is Putin merely holding out for a better deal for Russia, or is he going to “heroically” stop the agreement from happening?

The Paris Climate Change Summit was organized with a specific goal: “the objective of the 2015 conference is to achieve, for the first time in over 20 years of UN negotiations, a binding and universal agreement on climate, from all the nations of the world.”  If Putin blocks a unanimous climate change deal, it could mean that the idea of man-made climate change will be sacrificed as part of the BRICS-fronted NWO rollout. And the Western propagandists would seize upon Putin’s obstruction as yet another sign that Russia is acting as a “spoiler” to the “principled international order” (the Western decoy NWO)…

Looking ahead into 2016, the globalists are facing a hard deadline in September if they want to go through with their Obama-related prophetic bullsh*t. This means that 2016 has to be the year they trigger the next big economic and military crisis. By starting the ball rolling on December 16, they can begin the big ramp-up of economic troubles and military confrontations that will culminate next Fall. Our mission, then, must be to find a way of pushing them back past September. If we can do that, their whole timeline will be thrown into disarray.

[Update 86 – 11 November 2015]

NOTES ON THE UPCOMING G20 SUMMIT

(Note 1) – Turkey has been the host nation for the G20 this year, so have a look at what Turkey’s Daily Sabah is saying about the G20 Summit (which starts this Sunday)…

Speaking of the G20 and the quest for a new monetary system, can you guess which nation will host the G20 in 2016? Yep, it’ll be China. So if you take the talk of moving to a new monetary system and put it together with BRICS-leader China’s hosting of the G20 next year, can you see how a December Fed rate hike would facilitate things?

(Note 2 – 13 November 2015) – Since the G20 Summit ends just two weeks before the Paris Climate Change Summit begins, you can imagine what the main focus of the G20 final communique will be. Like all other globalist entities, the G20 is pushing hard for carbon controls. In fact, on the day the Pope stumped for Climate Control at the UN, the G20 was also at the UN lending their support…

…From G20.org

Of course, the G20 aren’t the only ones carrying water for Neo-Roman Climate Control. The globalist-controlled multinationals are in on it too…


…From “the world business organization”

In case you aren’t familiar with the International Chamber of Commerce, here is their Wikipedia intro…

“The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC; French: Chambre de commerce internationale (CCI)) is the largest, most representative business organization in the world. Its hundreds of thousands of member companies in over 180 countries have interests spanning every sector of private enterprise.

ICC has three main activities: rule setting, dispute resolution, and policy advocacy. Because its member companies and associations are themselves engaged in international business, ICC has unrivalled authority in making rules that govern the conduct of business across borders. Although these rules are voluntary, they are observed in countless thousands of transactions every day and have become part of international trade.

A world network of national committees in over 90 countries advocates business priorities at national and regional level. More than 2,000 experts drawn from ICC’s member companies feed their knowledge and experience into crafting the ICC stance on specific business issues.

ICC keeps the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, and many other intergovernmental bodies, both international and regional, in touch with the views of international business. ICC was the first organization granted general consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council.”

So they’re hooked into the UN, eh? Well so are the climate change propaganda sites, such as Climate Home…

If you look to the right side of Climate Home’s page to see their sponsors, here is one that stands out…

Clicking through to that sponsor’s page, we see who’s footing the bill for the climate change propaganda…

…The multilateral banks and the UN.

So as you can see, all roads lead to the UN, just like all roads led to Rome. Ergo, the UN is New Rome…

…From The Atlantic

It’s all quite a pity actually. Transitioning away from “fossil” fuels is something I’d like to see happen, but not if it’s done by this pack of elitist deceivers, thieves, and tyrants. Guided by their self-serving, obsessively-controlling hands, the whole exercise is bound to be an exorbitant, painful, freedom-destroying debacle.

(Note 3 – 13 November 2015) – On the sidelines of the G20 Summit, we’re likely to see BRICS officials complaining to the press about America’s obstruction of both the IMF’s quota reform and the yuan’s addition to the SDR basket of currencies. This complaining will be publicly seen as escalating to heavy-duty tension if the IMF’s board fails to add the yuan by the end of November.

In a Yahoo/AFP article titled IMF may decide inclusion of China’s yuan in SDR this month, it is suggested that the yuan could get the IMF’s approval before the end of November, but might have to wait until next September for the inclusion to be implemented. And in a separate article from Bloomberg, it’s suggested that the yuan’s acceptance is “basically a done deal, unless something really surprising and unexpected happens.”

Should the US be the source of “something really surprising and unexpected,” it would fit perfectly into the World War 3 buildup. Then again, the globalists might want China to get its foot in the SDR’s door before the hostilities begin. That way, the door will be open for China to bring in gold to save the IMF when the time is right. It’ll be interesting to see how they play it.

Much love…

Have a look at these two maps. The one on top shows the 1,800 km strike radius of a Chinese HN-2 cruise missile fired from a warship docked at Jacksonville, Florida. The bottom one shows the location of America’s active nuclear power plants…


…This is just one of the strike packages available to the Chinese Navy when it docks two of its warships at Naval Station Mayport on November 3rd.

Does it sound crazy to suggest that the Chinese might launch a preemptive strike against the US during their navy’s “goodwill visit” next week? Sure it does. Normally, I’d pay no attention to such a visit. But there are a discomforting number of coincidences surrounding this particular one, and it would be foolhardy to pay them no mind. So here goes…

Let’s begin by having a look at the headline of this USNI News article…

…Note the key words I’ve underlined.

The article tells of an upcoming Jacksonville, Florida port visit by two Chinese warships and a replenishment vessel, the “Type 052C Luyang II-class guided-missile destroyer Jinan (152), the Type 054A Jiangkai II-class guided-missile frigate Yiyang (548) and the Type 903 Fuchi-class fleet oiler Qiandao Hu (886).” The 2 missile ships mentioned are among the Chinese Navy’s most modern and capable surface combatants, and they’re able to carry a lot of cruise missiles. According to Wikipedia, the two ships carry a combined 24 cruise missiles of various types, and these missiles have speeds of up to Mach 0.9 and ranges of up to 1,800 kilometers. They also have a combined total of 80 vertical launch system (VLS) cells.

Current-day VLS systems are capable of carrying a variety of missile types and can hold one or more missiles in each cell. The French Navy’s Sylver VLS, for instance, is able to pack up to 4 rocket-propelled white flags per cell. Assuming that a longer-range cruise missile would take up a whole cell by itself, though, the Chinese ships could pack an additional 80 cruise missiles in their VLS, for a grand total of 104. And who knows what exotic varieties could be hidden in those cells.

So on the one hand, you have two guided missile warships that will dock inside America’s defensive umbrella on November 3rd. And on the other hand, you have propaganda floating around concerning America’s freedom of navigation operations and China’s threat of military reprisal…

…from Zero Hedge

You also have China openly proclaiming that war with the US is inevitable…

…from Express.co.uk

…and you have globalist windbag Paul Craig Roberts and others telling the world that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear strike against Russia and China…

…from PaulCraigRoberts.org

And what does all this set the stage for? For a preemptive strike by China in order to “protect itself” and respond to America’s “provocations.” All they’d have to do is sit there at Naval Station Mayport and salvo-off their cruise missiles.

A cruise missile attack is the ideal way for China to make a first strike since it would be very hard for America to stop. Cruise missiles fly very low, and they would be hard to distinguish from the vast number of military, commercial, and personal airplanes, helicopters, and drones that operate in the airspace of the Eastern US. Not only that, they’d be hard to pick out from the ground clutter along the I-95 Corridor that runs from Jacksonville to Washington, New York City, and beyond. The driving distance from Jacksonville to New York City is 936 miles, which puts it within range of the ships’ cruise missiles. In fact, most of the Eastern US would be within range.

BUT WHY? Why would anyone think that such a crazy thing would be attempted? Normally I wouldn’t, but I can’t ignore something the Economist magazine put on one of its covers in January of this year….

This group of images forms a symbolic statement, so let’s look at the images from left to right in order to decipher what they might mean…

> The Turtle – The turtle on the cover is shown moving away from what’s behind it – it’s fleeing. There are also lines drawn above it, as if to emphasize its shell and/or convey alarm. Seeing the concepts of “shell” and “alarm” being shown, the first word that came to my mind is “shelter.” So the turtle can be interpreted as meaning “flee and take shelter.”

> The Supersonic Car (SSC) – This is an image of the UK’s Bloodhound SSC…

If you look at its Wikipedia entry, you’ll see that the project started back in 2008, and it won’t make its attempt to break the land speed record until 2016 at the earliest. So if it isn’t something new and it won’t make its record attempt till at least next year, why is it featured on a cover devoted to events in 2015? Could it be there to represent not itself, but something it looks like…

…such as a cruise missile?

So the SSC can be interpreted as representing a cruise missile.

> The “Alice timeline” – I first wrote about this in a previous update, and it can be interpreted in two ways: it can represent a financial message related to the debt limit, and it can represent a warning message related to the Chinese naval visit. These are the fundamental aspects of it (excerpted from Update 83)…

>>> It was at this point that I realized I was looking at a timeline reference…

..As Alice looks forward with the Cricket World Cup behind her (during which the debt limit suspension ended on March 15), the first thing in her line of sight is the 11/3 arrow (the “debt limit is hit” date), and the second thing is the 11/5 arrow (the “we’re out of cash and in default” date). So Alice is there to show us how to look at the dates. <<<

Looking at this timeline from the Chinese naval visit perspective, it shows Alice seeing the date the warships arrive (11/3), and then seeing the date they launch their cruise missiles (11/5).

> The painting on the pile of dirt – If you look closely at the cover, you’ll see that Alice’s shadow and the shadows of the arrows fall upon the pile of dirt. This suggests that the timeline and the dirt pile are connected. And if you look upon the image of the painting sitting atop the dirt pile, one gets the impression that the gallery which held the painting has been destroyed and reduced to dirt.

Seeing this, I did a Google image search for “famous paintings of a lady,” and I found the featured painting among the results. It is a painting of an unknown lady from the Court of Milan done by Leonardo da Vinci. And once I discovered this, I decided to do a Google maps search to see if Milan had any geographic similarities to Jacksonville. Although that train of thought was a dead end, the search itself wasn’t. Off to the left side of the map, Google offered this…

Can you think of any American city that fits the description given Milan? New York City precisely fits it, doesn’t it? So this image of a painting sitting in a pile of dirt can be interpreted as showing one of the targets destroyed by the cruise missiles, NYC.

Now that we’ve explored the individual elements of the symbolic statement…

> the turtle means “flee and take shelter,”
> the supersonic car represents “a cruise missile (attack),”
> the Alice timeline gives us “the timeframe of the attack,” and
> the painting in the dirt gives us “a target of the attack, New York City.”

…let’s read it from left to right in English…

Had the Economist cover not featured this specific set of symbols, and had the port visit been arranged for any other day except November 3, I would not be writing about this scenario. But lest you think that subjective interpretations of a shady magazine cover are the only coincidences causing me discomfort, have a look at what happened on Wednesday…

…From Gizmodo

Two “aerostats” (tethered blimps) of the JLENS system had been keeping watch for cruise missiles over the East Coast airspace between North Carolina and the Canadian border since last December. From Defense Industry Daily…

Due to power line damage caused by the one that broke free on Wednesday, though, the “second balloon was hauled down Wednesday and grounded indefinitely.” So in a rather unnerving real-world “coincidence,” the system that was guarding Washington, DC and New York City from cruise missile attack is now disabled. Radar-equipped AWACS aircraft can fill the gap, of course, but what if someone in the globalist-controlled National Security Establishment (NSE) arranges for a gap in AWACS coverage at the appointed time?

Let us not forget that during 9/11, the NSE fired one of its own cruise missiles at a lightly-occupied section of the Pentagon (and then covered it up by hiding surveillance footage from the thousands of security cameras monitoring the building’s interior and exterior). Given this fact, is it so hard to believe that they might be in cahoots with the Chinese in arranging this November attack? Considering that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joseph Dunford, is a “fervent Catholic” / Jesuit asset, it’s rather easy to imagine that his network of cronies in the officer ranks could arrange for an AWACS crew mixup, mechanical problem, or network failure at the critical moment.

As I’m in the process of writing this entry module-by-module, an eagle-eyed reader has contacted me with more references he’s deciphered from the Economist cover…

> The turtle was drawn with 9 toes and 11 emphasis marks above its shell…

…(there is a tenth toe on the back foot — which I have dubbed the “plausible deniability toe” — but it is obstructed by another toe, so only 9 were drawn to be clearly visible)

So is it merely a coincidence that the turtle was drawn with a 9/11 encoding? Most unlikely. And if we add this additional information to what we’ve already covered, the turtle can be interpreted as meaning “flee and take shelter from (the next) 9/11.”

> Spider-Man is seen as he is about to swing between Alice and the painting on the pile of dirt, and his body is oriented towards the painting…

…And in the fairy tale land of comic books, where does Spider-Man live? New York City. So this is another possible reference to New York City being a target.

> Alice is looking at the Cheshire Cat’s grin, and the cat is drawn in front of Chinese President Xi, who is also grinning…

I had previously puzzled over the Cheshire Cat’s meaning, and I’d done searches on the cat’s relationship to Alice in order to figure it out. But I think the reader has found the true answer in something called the “Cheshire Cat Effect”…

“The Cheshire Cat effect, as described by Sally Duensing and Bob Miller, is a binocular rivalry which causes stationary objects seen in one eye to disappear from view when an object in motion crosses in front of the other eye. Each eye sees two different views of the world, sends those images to the visual cortex where they are combined, and creates a three-dimensional image. The Cheshire Cat effect occurs when one eye is fixated on a stationary object, while the other notices something moving. Since one eye is seeing a moving object, the brain will focus on it, causing parts of the stationary object to fade away from vision entirely.”

So how does this relate to the potential attack next week? Think about it… what will be in motion next week? What will be stationary? Next week, we may see another US Navy ship doing a freedom of navigation cruise in the South China Sea, and on the 5th, Xi (who represents the Cheshire Cat) will be on the move to Vietnam (one of the nations in contention with China over its island building). So there will be lots of movement in the South China Sea on the 5th, while the Chinese warships will be sitting stationary at Naval Station Mayport. While everyone is focused on what’s happening over there, they’ll be overlooking what’s about to happen right here.

The Cheshire Cat Effect is drawn right into the symbolic statement. While Alice’s gaze is fixed on the Cheshire Cat’s grin, she is overlooking the arrows with the warning dates on them.

Another thing the reader pointed out is that the mushroom cloud at the top of the cover is aligned with Spider-Man’s head, but that connection is a bit too tenuous for my taste. Besides, I’m not expecting the potential attack to include any nuclear weapons at all. If the Chinese were to nuke New York City, they might damage or destroy the UN, and they don’t want to alienate or obliterate the institution they’re about to overhaul. My current expectation is that they would use conventional warheads to attack the big New York financial houses (Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, etc.) and the New York Fed. I’ll now explain why…

I began this entry by bringing up the most damaging conventional attack I could imagine: a strike on the containment vessels of our nuclear plants with penetrator-tipped cruise missiles. I call this particular target package the “ugly package.” To arrive at the most likely target package, though, let’s consider what we know about both the attack and the globalist agenda…

1) If my interpretation is correct, New York is clearly indicated as a target.

2) The globalist agenda calls for the Western powers to lose “control” of the UN and for the BRICS powers to reform the institution to be “fairer and more effective in enforcing peace.”

3) The globalist agenda also calls for the collapse of the Western-controlled and dollar-dominated financial system. This will clear the way for the new multilateral financial system based on the “reformed” IMF’s SDR.

Given points 1 and 2, it seems very unlikely that any attack would be nuclear. The Chinese wouldn’t want to harm the UN in any way. They are too busy slavishly implementing the UN’s “sustainable development” agenda…

…From Sputnik

And given point 3, it’s not hard to imagine what targets they would hit in New York. They would aim for the key institutions that keep the current financial system running: the headquarters of Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and other such institutions. Again, the UN would be left untouched.

In addition to these strikes in New York, we can expect concurrent hits in Washington. They would target the Federal Reserve headquarters and IRS headquarters. But since the IMF and World Bank are part of the United Nations Complex, their headquarters would be left untouched. Why would they hit the IRS, you ask? Ostensibly to “starve the Pentagon war machine of the money it needs to operate,” but actually to make the strikes more palatable to the American public. Everybody hates the IRS.

Should the attacks occur, Americans would be shocked and outraged at first, but then they’d look at the fact that the Chinese…

> didn’t use nukes,

> didn’t attack our beloved military men,

> didn’t attack any national monuments such as the White House or Capitol building, and

> didn’t attack anyone but the vile banksters who hijacked America.

After the dust settles, a lot of Americans would want to buy the Chinese sailors some drinks. It’s for this reason that I call this particular target package the “pretty package.” Can you see why?

For their part, the Chinese would explain the attack like this…

“This was not an attack against the American people or military; it was a precision strike on the Wall Street – Washington Financial Axis. It is this Axis that has been firing thousands of cruise missiles and dropping thousands of bombs on people all over the world for decades. They have been funding terrorism and war everywhere on the planet, and they recently attacked China by sabotaging four of our chemical facilities in an attempt to intimidate us.

It is known to us that they have been escalating conflict to launch a new world war. and they have been planning a preemptive nuclear attack against us and our Russian allies. We had to act to protect ourselves and the world from their wicked schemes. We deeply regret any harm that came to innocents during the strikes, and we stand ready to offer vast aid and compensation to the cities and individuals effected. We hope you can understand that if we had not done this, many millions of innocents would have died from Wall Street and Washington’s plans.”

So this represents my best guess on the probable targets and likely excuses for any attack that might take place this week.

As for the timing of the potential attack, the dates on the warning arrows can be interpreted at least 3 ways: 1) 11.3 could be the date the ships arrive, and 11.5 could be the date they fire their missiles; 2) 11.3 could be the date the ships arrive, and 11.5 could be the “bug out by” date (meaning the attack could occur on the 5th, 6th, or 7th); or 3) 11.3 and 11.5 could be bookend dates (meaning the attack could occur on the 3rd, 4th, or 5th). Suffice it to say that the attacks could occur on any day during the port visit, which runs from November 3 to November 7.

All this being said, could this whole entry be much ado about nothing? Quite possibly. But given the unnerving coincidences I’ve pointed out, how could I justify not writing about it? Imagine if I had played it safe and stayed quiet, only to see the attack unfold on television in a few days – I would feel pretty terrible. And although this scenario sounds pretty crazy, think of how crazy it would’ve sounded if someone had warned you about the details of the 9/11 attacks just days before they happened:

“The gubernment is gonna crash two big airplanes into the World Trade Center buildings, then they’re gonna implode ‘em with demolition charges and thermite they already put inside ‘em. They’re also gonna bring down another building and blame it on a fire that melts steel. Then they’re gonna blow up a field in Pennsylvania with some kind of bomb or missile, and fire a cruise missile at the Pentagon. And after that, they’re gonna mail a buncha letters with anthraxes in ‘em. And when it’s all done with, they’re gonna start gropin’ folks at the airport.”

That warning would have seemed even more implausible than this one, right? But if someone had given such a detailed warning to enough people in advance, would the plotters have gone through with their plan? In answering this question, you see my motivation for giving this warning.

Now that the whistle is blown, the most likely outcome of the Mayport visit will be that the Chinese sailors play baseball and soccer, eat hot dogs and hamburgers, then sail home to make the second baby their government now allows them. All the doormen, maintenance men, mail room guys, and food service gals that work in the headquarters buildings will go home safe this week too. All in all, it’s not a bad return for an investment of a little bit of my credibility.

On a final note, I would be remiss if I didn’t draw your attention once more to the map at the very top of this entry. As you can see, the combat radius of the HN-2 missile extends far into Texas, and includes my own residence. So I think this would be an opportune time to express my great admiration for China’s proud military tradition and its great military leaders, such as Sun Tzu and General Tso. I once thumbed-through Sun Tzu’s book while I was on the can, and General Tso’s chicken soundly defeats my hunger each and every Sunday. It is for this reason I know that if World War 3 ends up being settled with a cook-off, you will rout our pot pie-baking asses quite handily. Ni hao, comrades! Don’t choke on the air, and have a great day!

Love always…

(P.S. – 1 November 2015) – Another reader has told me that the tortoise is one of the symbols of the Fabian Society (the founders of the infamous London School of Economics)…

…Take note that the tortoise has four toes, just like the one on the Economist cover.

Although I have used the catchall term “turtle” in talking about the shelled creature on the cover, it is technically a tortoise. Turtles spend most of their lives in water and have webbed feet, whereas tortoises are land dwellers that have stumpy feet.

Looking at the Fabian symbol, the associated motto is quite interesting considering the scenario we’re exploring…

So why would the Fabians sign their name to this warning, and why would they give it to us at all? Some say their twisted code of ethics requires them to tell us, and some say they do it to taunt us. Frankly, I don’t care why; I care only about what it says.

(P.S. – 2 November 2015) – So on the day before the port visit, the US announces this: U.S. Navy plans two or more patrols in South China Sea per quarter; the Chinese are doing this: China Sends Armed Jets Over Disputed Waters In Response to U.S. Naval Presence; and the Russians are narrating: ‘Stakes Are High’: Chance of War Between US, China Moves Up a Notch. Even though I doubt they’ll go through with any attack now, the buildup for one continues to be delivered on schedule.

(P.S. – 3 November 2015) – THE GLOBALISTS’ “ENHANCED CHINA MODEL”

Speaking of the Fabians, I wouldn’t get too caught up in the idea of this strike (or whatever black swan they end up trotting out) being about “socialism dealing a deathblow to capitalism.” Socialism/communism versus capitalism is just another artificial ideological dialectic, and “isms” themselves are contrived sets of ideas designed to entrap the minds of chumps. They are the mental boxes that discourage “outside the box” thinking.

From my current knowledge of what the globalists have planned, they seem to be aiming for an “Enhanced China Model” for the global economy. In China, the central government dictates the direction of the economy, but that direction is pursued with a capitalistic approach. And if the central planners don’t like something that’s going on in the capitalistic level, they step in and crush it. This is how I suspect the new globalist economy will operate.

At the UN level, the neo-Roman authorities will steer the direction of the economy (such as with the “Sustainable Development Agenda”), but they will allow the corporations to pursue that direction under an Austrian Economic Framework. That way, they’re in control (such as in a communist/socialist system), but things actually get done (such as in a capitalist system).

On another note, should this week’s strike occur, it doesn’t necessarily mean that World War 3 will be averted. I’m still expecting a stepwise series of escalations that will lead to a nuclear launch attempt next September. See Obama and the 2nd Coming to understand why.

(P.S. – 3 November 2015) – Speaking of the moving Cheshire Cat drawing attention away from the stationary warships, this historic event might do the trick…

…From Yahoo/AFP

(P.S. – 5 November 2015) – Here is more distracting motion in the South China Sea…

So it appears that Defense Secretary Carter’s visit to the aircraft carrier was the “provocation” arranged in lieu of a freedom of navigation patrol. Given that both Xi’s surprise summit on Saturday and Carter’s visit to the carrier today were arranged well in advance, it makes sense that they’re following through with their schedules even if any planned attack has been called off.

(P.S. – 7 November 2015) – The Chinese ships have now left Mayport with all their missiles aboard. Tomorrow, I’ll offer some final thoughts.

(P.S. – 8 November 2015)

And now for Kenny’s…

In case you’re still wondering about the other interpretation of the symbolic statement – the one relating to the debt limit and default — here is how it reads…

> the turtle means “flee (the markets) and shelter (your assets),”
> the supersonic car represents “a very fast-moving thing,”
> the Alice timeline gives us “a downward motion in the markets (symbolized by the slant of the arrows) occurring on the day of the debt limit hit (11/3) and the day of the debt default (11/5),” and
> the painting in the dirt gives us “stock markets and financial hubs (like Milan) left in ruins.”

Putting it together into a literal statement, we get this…

“Flee the markets and shelter your assets from a very fast-moving downward motion on November 3-5 which will leave the markets in ruins.”

But that didn’t happen, did it? And neither did the next 9/11. So was I just tilting at windmills or was there a real threat that one or both of these things were on the agenda? In order to think the former is true, you have to overlook a whole lot of “coincidences”…

1) You had a symbolic statement on the cover of an “elite”-owned magazine that lends itself to a description of both events.

2) You had the Treasury Department setting the date of the debt limit hit for 11/3, the first date in the symbolic statement. Of all the dates they could have chosen for D-Day, why did they opt for that specific one? They kept the whole debt limit charade going since March 15, and one gets the impression that they could’ve twisted their math to point to any D-Day they wished, either sooner or later, so why 11/3?

3) You had the Treasury Department specifically stating that there would be about $30 billion in cash on hand on 11/3, which could have kept the government’s bills paid until 11/5, the second date in the symbolic statement.

4) You had the Chinese Navy making their first-ever visit to an East Coast port on 11/3.

5) You had the Chinese announcement of a distracting surprise summit in the South China Sea just like the symbolic statement suggested.

6) You had the JLENS cruise missile detection system go down just a week before the naval visit, ensuring that any attacking missiles would have been more difficult to track and shoot down.

That’s an awful lot of coincidences to overlook, isn’t it? So even though I’ll never really know what might’ve been, I’ll accept our uneventful passage through the 11/3 – 11/5 timeframe as a victory.

On to the next risky timeframe!…

…(12/11 – 12/16, the time of the Climate Change Summit, the US Federal Budget deadline, and the FOMC meeting)

(Update 78 – 20 October 2015)

THE ONE-TWO PUNCH THAT WILL KNOCK DOWN THE DOLLAR: A US DEBT CEILING HIT AND GOLD-BACKED BRICS CURRENCIES

This has to change, and fast…

…From the IMF: The Dollar Reigns Supreme, by Default

…in order for the globalists to achieve this…

…Covered in Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce

Despite all the stories you’ve read about Russian and Chinese currency and trade deals that bypass the dollar, the dollar has barely budged from its dominant position. As The Heritage Foundation puts it…

“The U.S. dollar has dominated the international monetary system for approximately 70 years. While the U.S. economy has generated weak growth over the past six years and accumulated a large sovereign debt, the dollar’s status as an international medium of exchange and reserve currency (currency held by foreign central banks) has defied the odds and has not diminished.”

Given the dollar’s resilience and the globalists’ self-imposed goal of having a de facto world currency in use around 2018, how can they go from 2015’s dollar-dominated financial system to a SDR-based financial system in just 3 short years? Clearly a big, jolting change would be necessary, and it would have to include two key components:

1) Something would have to happen to cause a dramatic loss of confidence in the dollar, and

2) Something would have to happen to cause a dramatic increase of confidence in other currencies and the SDR.

Looking at the first component… nuking confidence in the dollar, we must remember that the dollar lost its gold backing back in 1971, so the only pillar on which its perceived value is based is the “full faith and credit of the US government.” In other words, the only thing that gives the dollar value is the US government’s willingness and ability to pay their bills.

So what happens to the perceived value of the dollar if confidence is lost in the US government’s willingness and ability to pay its bills?

The perceived value would plummet, of course, and that is why the globalists have arranged opportunities for both a US government shutdown and a US debt default in the current timeframe. We could be facing the debt default in as little as 14 days, although I suspect they might delay it until the Spring.

Looking at the second component… building confidence in other currencies and the SDR, we see why the BRICS nations, particularly China and Russia, have been beefing up their gold reserves in recent years. When they announce a partial gold backing/valuation of their currencies, the BRICS will create “safe” currency havens to which freaked-out dollar holders can run. Since the IMF also has substantial gold holdings, we can expect them to join the BRICS by backing the SDR with gold as well. I wrote about this in The coming BRICS gold standard, Ron Paul, and the Rockefellers.

We could see the BRICS’ first hint of the gold-backing scheme in about a week, when China debuts its next Five-Year Plan…

…A mere mention in that Plan of moving towards a gold-backed yuan would start the confidence ball rolling, but I suspect the actual backing won’t be implemented until the Spring at the earliest, around the time of the IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings.

(Update 79 – 21 October 2015)

WILL THE BIG SHOCK BE IN TWO WEEKS OR IN MARCH?

As we look forward from today, a potential sh*tstorm lies directly off our bow. Here is the sequence of events we face…

1) October 26-29: China will be holding their Central Committee Plenary Session where they will announce their new five-year plan. Should this plan speak of their intention to move to a gold backed/valued yuan, people all over the world will begin mentally weighing a coming golden yuan against a fiat dollar, and a major shift in monetary paradigms will ensue.

2) October 27-28: The FOMC will meet, and there are arguments to be made that a surprise rate hike might be in store. None of the arguments have to do with economic data or the altruistic-sounding supposed mission of the Fed; they have to do solely with the globalist agenda.

The globalists would be well-served by the US central bank raising rates and pissing off the entire world by making their dollar-denominated debts harder to service and roll over. Such a move would cause a stampede towards the BRICS and a bitter determination to get out from under dollar domination. On top of this, an October hike would be the banksters’ only opportunity to fulfill what they hinted at in the infamous Economist cover earlier this year…

…which suggests the Fed will set a panic in motion under the shadow of the Rugby World Cup (bottom left)…

…The Cup ends with its final match on October 31. Also note that a strong-looking China casts a shadow over the panic board. And what could make China look strong at the same time the Fed sets a panic in motion? The Central Committee announcing a move towards a golden yuan during its meeting that overlaps the FOMC meeting. Could the hints be any more clear?

3) November 3: The US government is scheduled to hit its debt limit on that day, and this would set something very impactful in motion…

A debt ceiling hit could not only lead to a US government debt default (thereby undermining the “full faith and credit of the US government”), but it could also lead to an immediate and near-total shutdown of the US government.

Let’s have a look at what Jack Lew said in this CNBC article…

…from two days ago…

>>> Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said Monday he worries that waiting until the last minute to raise the nation’s borrowing authority could result in an accident “that would be terrible.”

Last week, Lew said the U.S. debt ceiling will be exhausted Nov. 3, two days before previously estimated. In a letter to congressional leaders, he added that a remaining cash balance of less than $30 billion would swiftly deplete…

Lew dismissed the idea that the government could prioritize what bills to pay. “Once you no longer consider all of your obligations rock solid, you’re no longer the full faith and credit of the United States.”

“It’s also not possible to pick and choose. We have about 80 million transactions a month. Our system wasn’t set up not to pay,” he added. <<<

What he’s hinting at here is that he’d have to shut down the whole US government payment system, which means no bills at all will be paid. The whole government would grind to a halt (except for those who would go to work with no pay). Such an outcome would make America look like a dysfunctional banana republic, and who would trust in the “full faith and credit” of such a nation?

That being said, John Boehner is still the Speaker of the House, so I would expect him to join with Democrats to pass some sort of debt limit measure. And it could be the same sort of thing we saw the last time all this happened in 2013. From Wikipedia’s entry on the United States debt-ceiling crisis of 2013…

>>> In mid-January, Paul Ryan, Chairman of the House Budget Committee, floated the idea of a short-term debt ceiling increase. He argued that giving Treasury enough borrowing power to postpone default until mid-March would allow Republicans to gain an advantage over Obama and Democrats in debt ceiling negotiations. This advantage would be due to the fact that postponing default until mid-March would allow for a triple deadline to be in March: the sequester on March 1, the default in the middle of the month, and the expiration of the current continuing resolution and the resulting federal government shutdown on March 27. This was supposed to provide extra pressure on the Senate and the President to work out a deal with the Republican-led House. <<<

So Paul Ryan, who is currently being mentioned as Boehner’s replacement, favored pushing back the debt ceiling till March back then. Given that fact, we could very well see something along those lines passing the Congress in the next two weeks. Boehner could suspend the debt ceiling until March under the pretext of…

> Appeasing the House conservatives by not pushing through a long term increase of the ceiling, and

> Giving his replacement time to get settled and work towards a consensus before a long term decision is made.

Should they move towards such a bill, I’d expect them to throw in another continuing resolution to keep the government funded till then. That way, they could “settle all of it at once without the pressure of an imminent deadline.”

Once March comes, I’d expect things to break down “due to political posturing in advance of the Presidential and Congressional elections,” which would result in a shutdown and default. And this would help set the stage for contentious IMF/World Bank Spring Meetings with a world already enraged by the effects of a Fed rate hike. America would hold its ground and block reform at the meeting, and this would provide pretext for increasing military conflict.

A lovely scenario, no? Let’s see if they’ll follow through.

(P.S. – 21 October 2015) – Whilst pondering the Economist cover, I realized something I’d previously overlooked. Have a second look at that section to see what it is.

(Update 80 – 23 October 2015)

CUE THE PLANNED PARENTHOOD TAPES

I was wondering if some sort of mischief would happen on the 22nd (yesterday), and upon scanning the news this morning, I found this on Politico…

Here is the source of the video release…

…and the “babymeat” videos can be found on YouTube here.

So all of the Planned Parenthood footage has been publicly dumped to roil conservatives just one week before the election for House Speaker and less than two weeks from the debt ceiling deadline. Nice timing, isn’t it?

(Update 81 – 23 October 2015)

HOW PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS COULD LEAD TO A SHUTDOWN

The conventional wisdom proffered by the mainstream media suggests that Boehner will join with Democrats to raise the debt limit till March of 2017, which puts the next deadline past the Presidential election and past Obama’s term as President. I, however, view the situation from a less conventional perspective. With the globalists’ clear aim to depose the dollar in mind, I ask myself the following question: When the globalist handlers whisper into the ears of the sleeper Congressmen, what are they telling them?

If I were a globalist, I’d be telling the Democrats this…

“The Republicans are in disarray right now, and the cause of that disarray is the conflict between moderates and conservatives, especially due to Planned Parenthood and fiscal issues related to the budget and debt limit. With a Presidential election just a year away, why would you want to join with Boehner to end the Republican infighting? We need to keep it going and to time it to cause maximum damage to their election prospects. Withhold support for any debt limit extension that doesn’t end before the election. Let the Republicans fight amongst themselves and crash the government. It’ll set us up to take the White House AND Capitol Hill.”

And I’d be telling the Republicans this…

“All the Planned Parenthood videos have been released, so we need to strike while the outrage is hot. And we can’t let Boehner give a blank check to Obama through the end of his Presidency. If we are ever going to nail Planned Parenthood and Obama, it has to be NOW. Just look at how well Trump is doing, and he’s succeeding because he takes strong stands on principle. We have to take a stand too; it can only help us come election time. We need to stop any clean resolutions from passing. We have to force Obama to veto OUR bill, then people will see that it is he who is wrecking the government.”

And with that, I’d set the Congress (and by extension, the dollar) on a collision course with disaster. With all that’s at stake, the outcome of this situation will tell us exactly how tight is the globalist grip on the Congress. A debt ceiling pushback until 2017 would cause a delay and/or loss of effectiveness for the globalist plan, and that might indicate there is some degree of resistance in the Congress, just as there has been in the EU nations that haven’t passed the bail-in rules.

(Update 82A – 24 October 2015)

THE VATICAN IS TRYING AGAIN TO SHUT DOWN THE US GOVERNMENT

After reading about the release of the new Planned Parenthood videos, I decided to have a quick look at the person leaking them, Charles C. Johnson. I found more than I expected.

Let’s start by taking note of something Johnson said in this article from his “gotnews” website. In it, he is relating a conversation he had with another “journalist”…

“We briefly discussed being co-religionists. We are both Catholics and he had just come back from seeing a piece of the cross on his vacation. I discussed why I became a Catholic convert and that my work is animated by the line from Scripture that you shall know the truth and it shall set you free. He says Italy is quite pretty. I’m inclined to go sometime.”

So like David Daleiden, the man supposedly behind the Planned Parenthood videos, Johnson is a Catholic. Not only that, he is a convert, which raises the obvious question: Why would anyone (who isn’t being tortured) convert to Catholicism? Converting to Rome’s mythical religion is like upgrading your computer to Windows 3.1 – it’s a big step backwards. Perhaps it was a necessary career move.

After digging a bit further, I came across this article on The Daily Beast. Here is an interesting excerpt…

>>> Daleiden also made another friend in his college years: then-classmate, Charles C. Johnson…

In several posts on The Claremont Conservative, Johnson gushes about Daleiden’s work on campus, referring to him once as a “friend” and a “great example.” In 2008, the two apparently took a weekend trip together to attend a pro-life conference “up in Northern California.” Nearer graduation, Johnson described how he first met Daleiden:

“David, dear readers, was one of the first people I met when I came to campus. We both lived in Stark, we were both night owls, and we both were very broadly speaking conservatives. Over time, he won me over on many—though not all—of his pro-life arguments. And as I celebrate [David’s] victory, I can feel a small part of it.” <<<

So both Daleiden and Johnson attended Claremont McKenna College and were friends there. Given this longstanding connection, what are the odds that Johnson got the new Planned Parenthood tapes from a Congressional staffer and not Daleiden as claimed?

Now that we’ve established that both Daleiden and Johnson are Catholic and have a personal connection, how do we make the leap of seeing them as sock puppets serving the Vatican agenda?

(Update 82B – 25 October 2015)

First, we must recognize how the Occulted Powers’ minion class recruits new members. On college campuses all over the world, they run student activist organizations of all stripes in order to lure in people of a variety of mindsets. And when they identify members who show promise, they begin to mentor and groom them for roles in the system. After graduation, they arrange opportunities for their young charges, such as jobs, ideas, open doors, and financial backing to do things that are useful to the Establishment agenda. Sometimes these kids might understand what they’re doing, but I suspect in most cases they are blinded by their spoonfed ideology and believe they’re doing good in the world.

With this in mind, have a look at the deleted David Daleiden bio referred to in the Daily Beast article…

>>> David Daleiden has a passion for promoting the culture of life in communities and campuses across the country. He is proud to be a part of the Live Action team.

A native of the Sacramento area, David first became involved with the pro-life movement at age 15, working with local college pro-life groups and learning from veteran activists in his community. He founded a pro-life club at his high school, helped bring pro-life debater Scott Klusendorf to his hometown, and has participated in the “Genocide Awareness Project” to show abortion images to the public. David points to such images as the original impetus for his work in the pro-life movement.

During high school, David was also heavily involved in speech and debate. He first met Lila Rose in the Junior State of America (JSA) organization, and over the years became more and more involved in Live Action.

In 2007, David began his studies at Claremont McKenna College (CMC) in Claremont, California. David currently runs a Live Action chapter in Claremont, which routinely conducts sidewalk counseling efforts, community education, and campus activism. <<<

So David was guided down the anti-abortion path by a college activist group. Now let’s have a look at the Wikipedia bio of Charles C. Johnson, who took the journalism path…

“Johnson attended Claremont McKenna College, graduating in 2011. During his college years he was awarded the Eric Breindel Collegiate Journalism Award and the Publius Fellowship at the Claremont Institute.”

And what is the Publius Fellowship?…

“The Publius program is the institute’s oldest fellowship program. Since 1979, the institute has hosted a number of young conservatives for seminars and symposia on American politics and political thought. Publius fellows, usually college seniors, recent college graduates, and graduate students, meet with the institute’s fellows and other distinguished scholars for several weeks during the summer.”

So young gullible minds get warped by old twisted minds. And what of the Eric Breindel Collegiate Journalism Award?…

“The Eric Breindel Award for Excellence in Opinion Journalism [a.k.a. Mindfu*king the Public], also known as the Eric Breindel Journalism Award, is an annual award commemorating Eric Breindel, a former editorial page editor of the New York Post…

The award was instituted in 1999 with an endowment from Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation…

As second award, the Eric Breindel Collegiate Journalism Award, has been given annually since 2006. As of 2009, it offers $10,000 plus a paid internship at Fox News Channel, The Wall Street Journal, or the New York Post.”

So Johnson got a hand from the globalist News Corporation early on, eh? Who’d a thunk it?

Now that these “promising young men” have graduated into the real world, they find themselves tossing very timely grenades into a situation that could lead to the shutdown and default of the US government. How aware are they of their role in the Vatican / Jewish / Royal / Freemasonic conspiracy to topple the West and bring in a New World Order from the East? Are they fully-aware front men, like Edward Snowden, through whom information is being publicly released by the forces operating behind the scenes? Or are they just idealistic young sock puppets who have been manipulated into performing a specific role at a specific time? I don’t know, but I do know this…

Since the videos were released on the 22nd, conservative and anti-abortion activist groups have been poring over them and preparing articles, videos, and mass mailing campaigns for launch on Monday. They’ll all reach out to the people on their contact lists to urge them to pressure their Congressmen this week, and this will make it harder for a “clean” resolution to make it to Obama’s desk.

For more background information on David Daleiden and the Vatican agenda, have a look at my coverage from their last attempt to shut down the government: Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Updates 74-75 – The Vatican Conspiracy to Shut Down the US Government.

(Update 83 – 26 October 2015)

MORE ON THE ECONOMIST COVER AND THE DEBT LIMIT

Upon focusing on the debt limit hints on the Economist magazine cover (which are discussed in the P.S. below this update), there were three things I was wondering about…

1) Why are the dates seemingly in reverse order, with the 11.5 arrow appearing before the 11.3 arrow (when reading from left to right)?

2) What does the Alice figure (from Alice in Wonderland) represent?

3) What kind of ball is that behind Alice?

In a lovely little piece of synchronicity, a reader sent me an unsolicited email explaining that the ball is a cricket ball…

…which is an unfamiliar sight to Texan eyes such as mine.

So after getting this clue, I decided to see if there was a big cricket tournament this year, and I found this…

…which started on February 14 and ended on March 29.

It was at this point that I realized I was looking at a timeline reference…

..As Alice looks forward with the Cricket World Cup behind her (during which the debt limit suspension ended on March 15), the first thing in her line of sight is the 11/3 arrow (the “debt limit is hit” date), and the second thing is the 11/5 arrow (the “we’re out of cash and in default” date). So Alice is there to show us how to look at the dates.

On another note, news is out today that the current Congressional leaders are working with Obama to reach a budget/debt limit deal tonight. The deal would give both Obama’s agenda and Planned Parenthood full funding and a smooth ride all the way through the end of his Presidency, so keep a careful watch on how the House Freedom Caucus responds to it. If they roll over, the deal will go through, but if they threaten a no-confidence vote on Boehner — a motion to vacate the chair — the odds for a debt limit doomsday increase substantially.

(P.S. – 24 October 2015) – A reader put me on to this article from the Investment Watch Blog: 2015 Economist Magazine Cover Features Nov 3 and Nov 5. It notes how the arrows at the bottom right of the cover correspond to dates related to the debt ceiling…

Pondering this, I recall reading somewhere that once we hit the 11/3 deadline and the Treasury’s “extraordinary measures” are exhausted, they would have only about $30 billion cash on hand with which to pay bills. So if the government spends $15 billion per day, we’d run out of cash to pay bills on 11/5. For reference purposes, the US government was spending about $11 billion per day in 2012, and that figure is bound to be higher now.

P.P.S. – I found the article I remember reading. It’s this one on USA Today…

“The Treasury Department has already been operating under “extraordinary measures” to keep under the limit since March, by delaying payments to pension funds and borrowing from currency reserve accounts. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew has told Congress he expects those measures to run out by Nov. 3, when the government will have just $30 billion in cash on hand. The government typically spends $60 billion a day.”

So the “We’re Dead Broke Day” will come as early as the 3rd or as late as the 5th, depending on what the correct figure for daily government spending is during those particular days of the month.

(Update 84.1 – 27 October 2015)

PEARL HARBOR IN MAYPORT? — AN ALTERNATIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE ECONOMIST’S “ALICE TIMELINE”

Given the upcoming visit of a Chinese missile destroyer and missile frigate to Florida’s Naval Station Mayport on November 3rd through November 7th, does the Alice timeline refer to the debt limit or to the days the Chinese warships arrive and then fire their cruise missiles?

Have a look at this section of the cover…

…and look at the two objects sitting to the left of Alice. What does the larger one look like? What does the smaller one suggest?

There’s an awful lot of unnecessary fear predictions made in the alternative media concerning military activities, and I’ve learned over time to keep clear of them. That being said, I’ve come across one military scenario that causes me some real discomfort: a potential Chinese preemptive strike from within America’s air defense umbrella. Let’s look at the headline of the USNI News article linked at the beginning of this update…

…Note the key words I’ve underlined.

The article tells of an upcoming Jacksonville, Florida port visit by two Chinese warships and a replenishment vessel, the “Type 052C Luyang II-class guided-missile destroyer Jinan (152), the Type 054A Jiangkai II-class guided-missile frigate Yiyang (548) and the Type 903 Fuchi-class fleet oiler Qiandao Hu (886).” The 2 missile ships mentioned are among the Chinese Navy’s most modern and capable surface combatants, and they’re able to carry a lot of cruise missiles. According to Wikipedia, the two ships carry a combined 24 cruise missiles of various types, and these missiles have speeds of up to Mach 0.9 and ranges of up to 1,800 kilometers. They also have a combined total of 80 vertical launch system (VLS) cells.

Current-day VLS systems are capable of carrying a variety of missile types and can hold one or more missiles in each cell. The French Navy’s Sylver VLS system, for instance, is able to pack up to 4 rocket-propelled white flags per cell. Assuming that a longer-range cruise missile would take up a whole cell by itself, though, the Chinese ships could pack an additional 80 cruise missiles in their VLS, for a grand total of 104. And who knows what exotic varieties could be hidden in those cells.

So on the one hand, you have two guided missile warships that will dock inside America’s defensive umbrella on November 3rd. And on the other hand, you have propaganda floating around concerning America’s freedom of navigation operations and China’s threat of military reprisal…

…from Zero Hedge

You also have China openly proclaiming that war with the US is inevitable…

…from Express.co.uk

…and you have globalist windbag Paul Craig Roberts and others telling the world that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear strike against Russia and China…

…from PaulCraigRoberts.org

And what does all this set the stage for? For a preemptive strike by China in order to “protect itself” and respond to America’s “provocations.” All they’d have to do is sit there at Naval Station Mayport and salvo-off their cruise missiles.

A cruise missile attack is the ideal way for China to make a first strike since it would be very hard for America to stop. Cruise missiles fly very low, and they would be hard to distinguish from the vast number of military, commercial, and personal airplanes, helicopters, and drones that operate in the airspace of the Eastern US. Not only that, they’d be hard to pick out from the ground clutter along the I-95 Corridor that runs from Jacksonville to Washington DC, New York City, and beyond. The driving distance from Jacksonville to New York City is 936 miles, which puts it within range of the ships’ HN-2 cruise missiles. In fact, most of the Eastern US would be within range.

To be continued in Update 84.2 (and don’t fret too much; I don’t expect this to happen, but I would be remiss if I didn’t help build preemptive awareness against it)…

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++++++++P.S. – 28 October 2015++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

THE GLOBALISTS MISS THE TRAIN AGAIN

There was no rate hike today, so barring a Congressional failure to pass the budget deal, there will be no financial panic set in motion today. Since I can see no other way for the “panic board” part of the Economist cover to be fulfilled in 2015, it looks like it won’t be. And this makes it more unlikely that the Alice timeline part will be fulfilled as well. I’ll nonetheless finish Update 84 out of an abundance of caution.

I’m happy that this opportunity for mischief passed by without incident; that’s my whole purpose in blogging. But I’m also a little sad because I spent all my free time this morning sharpening my “guillotine entry.” Had the globalists stuck their neck out with a rate hike at 2 PM EDT, all I had to do was push the publish button. Many more people would have been exposed to the information I offer, and my blog would have gotten much bigger overnight. Oh well, it’s better to stay small and sail harmlessly past these dangers than to get bigger and watch them be fulfilled.

P.P.S. – Perhaps I spoke too soon. As I look through the press reports from today, they are noting that the mere shift in Fed language from “dovish” to “hawkish” has sent the dollar soaring, essentially having the same effect as an actual rate hike. We’ll have to see if this dollar-strengthening (and emerging market-strangling) trend continues.

Correction – Concerning the part of this entry in which Johnson spoke of David Daleiden using a fake name, I realized that he could have been referring to the fake persona David created to infiltrate Planned Parenthood, so I removed that part. My bad. I still find it interesting that his last name is an anagram of “deadline,” because we’re certainly facing one now, aren’t we?

For the previous updates from this series, click here.

Love always…

(Update 76 -19 October 2015)

THE GLOBALISTS MISS THE “7″ TRAIN TO ECONOMIC CRISIS

”Now I’m going to test your numerology skills by asking you to think about the Magic 7”…

…Link

Most of the time, the globalist agenda plods along at a pace so slow that the few in the public register its movement. But at certain times, they take a big leap towards their goals, such as…

> On September 11, 2001, when the Twin Towers fell, the world was plunged into perpetual war, and totalitarian amendments began creeping into the Western societies…

…and 7 years later…

> On September 15, 2008, when Lehman Brothers fell and took the global financial system with it, thus leading to a massive, ongoing consolidation of wealth into the banksters’ hands…

…and 7 years later…

> On September 17, 2015, when another crisis was to be set in motion, BUT WASN’T.

So what happened? Why did the globalists miss their 7-year window last month and mess up their Magic 7 crisis numerology? Let’s take a moment to think it through…

They had set the stage for the September 2015 crisis very well:

1) Expectations for a September rate hike from the Federal Reserve had been established over the course of the year, and the IMF, World Bank, and BIS had issued their warnings to give themselves “we warned the Fed not to do it” bragging rights.

2) The US federal budget process was allowed to drift aimlessly through the year to set up another dramatic shutdown opportunity on October 1st.

3) The US government debt limit was ignored since March 15 to allow it to be brought up as a dire issue in the Fall.

With a pre-arranged set of crisis points in hand, the globalists were to use them as follows:

1) They planned to hike the Fed interest rate on September 17 to trigger an external crisis in the developing markets.

2) They planned to then trigger a US government shutdown on October 1st after the Pope’s visit to – and judgement of – the US. This would have brought the crisis home and led to a shutdown of record-setting duration.

3) They planned for the shutdown to segue into the debt limit battle in early November, and the US was intended to hit the limit and default, thus triggering a crisis of confidence in the US dollar and a full-on sh*tstorm in the global financial system. This would have set the stage for increasing military conflict as we march towards next September.

So why did they back off? Was it due to unfinished preparations, such as the non-adoption of bank bail-in rules in some EU nations? Was it due to excessive awareness of their plans in the blogosphere? And what is the significance of their inability to fulfill their Magic 7 numerological voodoo? Christine Lagarde must be heartbroken. Oh well, perhaps she can take solace in knowing that I think she’s a helluva gilf.

Although the globalists appear to have pressed the delay button, they certainly haven’t pressed the cancel button. They have a chance to trigger the same three events starting at the end of this month, and that will be the subject of an upcoming update.

(Update 77 – 20 October 2015)

A NEW BLACK SWAN JOINS THE FLOCK: A STRATEGIC DEFAULT OF RUSSIA’S DEBT

I came across a rather provocative propaganda piece on RT this morning: Moscow doubles down on Washington. It begins with this…

“History may eventually decide the ‘New World Order’ started on September 28, when Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Barack Obama had a 90-minute face off at the UN in New York.”

September 28 was the day of the Super Blood Moon if you recall, and Putin met Obama after the eclipse had transpired. Given the deeply superstitious nature of the globalist “elite,” the article’s author, Brazilian Pepe Escobar, is probably right in saying the 28th will be the day history records the tide as turning against the West.

Escobar continues…

“Putin did press Obama for the US to join Russia in a real grand coalition bent on smashing ISIS/ISIL/Daesh. The Obama administration, once again, relented.”

Of course Obama didn’t join the “grand coalition”; the globalist script didn’t call for that. I wrote about the hidden purpose of ISIS back in September of 2014 (link)…

BEGIN EXCERPT >>> In my last update, I wrote this about the globalist strategy for the September – November time frame: “Bad Western conduct will also be clearly noted in the press. This combination of economic weakness and bad behavior will be seized upon by the BRICS nations as they press for the dissolution of Western dominance of the IMF and related institutions.” Well, the whole ISIS debacle is a glaring example of this; it is purposely transparent foolishness that sets up the BRICS alliance for an easy propaganda win.

And the BRICS knock it out of the park!…

It’s really a very simple strategy on the globalists’ part: have the Western division (which controls the old financial system) create transparent havoc, then have the Eastern division (which will bring in the new financial system) point out the West’s misconduct and earn trust from the public. The people will then see the BRICS as straight talking guys who are different from the evildoers in NATO. Of course, all one needs to do to see through this propaganda campaign is look at how the 99% are treated in the BRICS countries. Despite the stage plays the G20 politicians put on for public consumption, all the G20 central bankers are working from the same script. <<< END EXCERPT

And now we get to the good part of the RT article…

“So what Glazyev proposes, essentially, is that Moscow must gain total control of its Central Bank, preventing speculators to move their credit around for non-productive purposes…

Essentially, once again, a Russian default on a $1 trillion-plus debt to private Western parties remains a possible scenario discussed at the highest level – assuming Washington will persist in its anti-Russia demonization campaign.

It’s clear the squeeze Russia is feeling has less to do with sanctions than the grip maintained by Western financial powers over the Russian Central Bank. The Russian Central Bank did create a debt trap by maintaining high interest rates in Russia while the West was lending at low interest rates.

Needless to add, such a default, if it ever happened, would collapse the entire Western financial system.”

In this passage, we see a very clear application of the East versus West propaganda template. And the solution it offers is exactly what I wrote about in the NWO Schedule of Implementation page…

BEGIN EXCERPT >>> A core component of the globalists’ strategy to centralize power over the world’s currencies lies in making the Fed and their other national central banks look bad. For this reason, they’ve been deliberately staging “currency wars” and having their supranational institutions (the IMF and the BIS) and media propagandists point out the destructive nature of the policies being pursued at the national level. “Only at the international level,” they argue, “can currency stability be achieved.”

In keeping with this strategy, they are using their national central banks to blow up the global economy so their supranational institutions can step forward and restore order. And as they transition power from the national to the supranational level, they will close down the Fed and other central banks in order to transfer control of national currencies to their respective treasury departments. Since the central banksters have consolidated power over the national governments, they can safely move their “flag” from the central banks to the treasuries. The treasuries are run by their people anyhow.

So when you hear alternative media propaganda about “ending the Fed” and “bringing back a US Treasury dollar,” know that this is the solution the banksters want you to embrace. It is a solution designed to make it appear that the problem posed by the “evil Western central bankers” has been licked, but it’s just a scam. And in the US, Ron and Rand Paul are the primary controlled-opposition agents the globalists have designated to con you. <<< END EXCERPT

So this RT article hits all the points we’ve been expecting, but it adds something new to the mix: the specter of a strategic Russian debt default. Such a move would provide the pretext for collapsing the old financial system without the need for a Fed rate hike, a US government shutdown, and/or a debt ceiling-triggered US debt default. Nonetheless, these three events remain highly desirable for advancing the globalist agenda, and I’ll outline the reasons why in the next update.

For the previous updates in this series, click here.

With love…

[Update 74]

The globalists continued their pattern of pressing the delay button on their 2015 agenda today, but one major US-related element remains: the potential government shutdown at the end of this month. Given that the Fed delayed their rate hike, the possibility of a shutdown seems more remote, but it remains a possibility to be watched…

…From U.S.News

After meeting with President Obama today, Congressional Democratic leaders expressed their desire to pass a short-term continuing resolution to keep the government open, but as the U.S. News article suggests, conservative Republicans may use the abortion issue to justify a possible shutdown…

“House Republican leaders scrambled on Thursday to head off a politically damaging government shutdown in two weeks over rebellious conservatives’ demand that any stopgap spending bill block federal funds for Planned Parenthood…

Boehner’s clear but unstated preference is to pass a temporary funding bill that’s free of the Planned Parenthood controversy. Democrats are sure to filibuster any bill defunding Planned Parenthood should it come to a vote in the Senate, and Obama has promised a veto regardless.”

If we look at the Congressional calendar, we see that after Friday, the first day both chambers of Congress will be in session to work out any possible spending measure will be on September 24, the day the Pope speaks to them…

…(Source: klgates.com – red means only the Senate is in session; blue means both the Senate and House are in session)

This raises a few obvious questions…

On the day after Obama insults the Pope at their White House meeting (by having pro-abortion and pro-gay activists there to meet him), what will the Pope have to say about abortion and the Planned Parenthood issue?

Will Obama’s disrespect of the Pope enrage conservative Republicans and spur them to dig in their heels and stop any budget deal that includes Planned Parenthood funding?

When the Pope leaves the US on September 27, will he leave behind a corpse that will start smelling on October 1?

Oh, the drama! 🙂

(P.S. – 17 September 2015)

Here is a very observant comment from a reader concerning the Fed rate hike…

“I have been reading your blog for a while now and… I thought your take on this week’s fed meeting was spot on, but something kept nagging at me. Why would the Fed trip a panic BEFORE the Pope passes God’s judgement on America? The economic downfall has to be seen as a consequence of America’s evils. Then they hit delay again today, so I looked at the next FOMC meeting – October 28th. Then I checked the end of the rugby world cup – October 31st. Plenty of time to drum up a lot more warnings to the Fed and still have the market collapse fall under the shadow of the world cup. This also allows for whatever condemnations the Pope has in store to be delivered first. Just something I noticed, you probably did too!”

Well, dear reader, I probably would have noticed it… tomorrow.  I have to say that I’m thrilled when my readers can beat me to the punch on something like this (it saves me extra mental work)…

(P.S. – 19 September 2015)

Upon looking into the media propaganda surrounding the Planned Parenthood Issue and the potential government shutdown, I ran across this…

So the guy behind the Planned Parenthood controversy is Catholic, eh? Methinks I smell a setup.  I’ve found a number of other interesting connections that I’ll tell you about in a new update tomorrow.

[Update 75 – 20-21 September 2015]

Whilst pondering the question posed by Update 74…

What will the Pope say about Planned Parenthood?

…an idea came to me: that the people behind the Planned Parenthood controversy would likely release one of their most incriminating videos during the week of the Pope’s visit. So I decided to have a look at them.

First, I came across this very telling article from Yahoo News…

It states that the group behind the videos, the “Center for Medical Progress,” released its 6th video this past week. So if they release another one this coming week (likely on Tuesday), it will be number 7. The article goes on to explain that the group has been releasing videos since July 14 (7/14). Given the “elite’s” obsession with the “Magic 7” in what’s going on right now in the world, all these sevens raised my eyebrow. Here are some notable excerpts from the article…

>>> The Hill reports that Rep. Diane Black, R-Tenn., was but one of many Republican leaders invited to a screening of the CMP tapes held by antiabortion colleagues in Congress held “weeks before” the footage was publicly released…

The Center for Medical Progress describes its own work as “a 30-month-long investigative journalism study … documenting how Planned Parenthood sells the body parts of aborted babies. Citizen journalists at CMP spent two-and-a-half years logging thousands of research hours to painstakingly gather hundreds of hours of undercover footage, dozens of eye-witness testimonies, and nearly two hundred pages of primary source documents. This information will continue to be made available to the public at this site.” <<<

This tells us that the group has serious political connections and deep pockets backing it up. As for the whole effort being conducted by “citizen journalists,” I had to laugh. Looking at the Catholic leader of the group, David Daleiden…

….one sees the smart, tricky eyes of a hardcore political operative, and his face has the “I just got pumped in the keister” look of a Catholic altar boy. Although I can’t speak to the accuracy of the above photo’s caption, the two other people it mentions, Lila Rose and James O’Keefe, also have ties to Catholicism.

Seeing Catholic hands pushing the Planned Parenthood controversy, seeing the imminent arrival of the Pope on the eve of a potential government shutdown caused by the controversy, and seeing one-third of the Congress being Catholic (including both leaders in the House of Representatives)…

…I began to smell a setup.

But why? Why would the Vatican want to shut down the US government?

The short answer is twofold: 1) to initiate self-fulfillment of the Bible’s End Times prophecies, and 2) to start the launch sequence of the Rockefeller-planned, UN-Centered, BRICS-fronted, G20-implemented, multilateral / multipolar New World Order. But let’s look a little deeper into these motives to gain a better understanding…

As was noted in Update 73 (which is a must-read), the Pope’s visit was timed to coincide with the start of Yom Kippur and the prophetic Jubilee Year. He will be meeting Obama at the White House during “the Day of Atonement for personal and national sins,” and Obama will not be atoning. As is noted by this Breitbart article and numerous other reports, Obama has invited some provocative guests to confront the Pope…

…,The guest list includes…

> A slavishly pro-Obama (and stealthily pro-abortion) nun named Sister Simone Campbell…

…who has built her own political fiefdom in contravention to Vatican authority.

> A transexual (born male / now female) religious activist named Vivian Taylor…

> A transexual (born female / now male) religious activist named Mateo Williamson…

Just imagine the spectacle that will be created if the White House arranges for them to be in the meet and greet line for the Pope. It will be the photo op seen ‘round the world. Christian eschatologists will later point to this meeting as the day God judged America for its immorality. And by arranging a government shutdown just days after the Pope leaves, the US would be seen as sputtering into disarray in his wake.

As for the New World Order aspect, a government shutdown would make America look like a dysfunctional basket case as the world gathers for the October 9-11 IMF/World Bank Group Annual Meeting. Given that the US Congress has blocked governance reform at the IMF since 2010, the shutdown would be used to great propaganda effect in the globalists’ de-Americanization effort.

On top of this, the US is forecast to run out of money due to the debt limit in early November, just prior to the November 15-16 G20 Leaders Summit…

…from The Huffington Post

If Congress stumbles on the debt limit as well, even if only for a few days, they will hand ammunition to the rest of the G20 to de-Americanize without delay. A debt limit hit could also lead to “a catastrophic default, which would freeze credit markets, undermine global economic stability and threaten the dollar’s role in international finance” – just what the globalists want. The judged nation, America, would then head into 2016 in very serious trouble.

With all this in mind, let’s now project our minds forward to Thursday at 10 AM. The Pope is standing before a joint session of Congress on the day after being insulted by Obama and after having been hounded by the press over the Planned Parenthood video that came out on Tuesday. Will he hesitate to speak out about the abortion issue? And if he does speak of it, what obligation will that impose on the Catholic leaders of the House and the one-third of Congress who are Catholic? What effect will it have on other anti-abortion members of Congress?

Looking at it logically…

> It will embolden abortion foes to not give an inch on their demands to strip out Planned Parenthood funding from any resolution to fund the government.

> It will cause Congressional leaders to be more permissive of a filibuster to block any funding resolution that includes Planned Parenthood funding. This would result in a government shutdown caused by abortion foes (most likely by Senator Ted Cruz).

> Alternatively, it will increase the likelihood that a funding resolution with no Planned Parenthood funding will pass. This would result in a government shutdown caused by Obama’s veto.

So if they pull the trigger on this, who will be the one who shuts down the government, Ted Cruz or Barack Obama? It’s hard to say, but let me tell you about Ted Cruz:

Ted Cruz is the man the media are promoting as the most likely to shut down the government…

…from Legal Insurrection

Fellow Republicans are cautioning against him doing so because they see no “path to victory,” but that didn’t stop Cruz from helping shut down the government last time…

…from Politico

And if you think about it from a long-term political perspective, shutting down the government over abortion might be a good move for Cruz. With our borders being held wide open by Obama, our nation is becoming more Mexican by the day, and 83% of Mexicans are Catholic. So being an Hispanic Senator who stands strong with the Pope on abortion should make him a political hero. It will increase his popularity with non-Hispanic Catholics and Protestants as well.

Another person who supports shutting down the government over Planned Parenthood is Donald Trump…

…from CNN

And wouldn’t you know it, he and Ted Cruz are in bed together…

…from The Blaze

So will a Pope-blessed government shutdown over abortion lead to a surge in popularity for the “principled” Ted Cruz? Will it help lead to a Trump/Cruz Presidential ticket? Or will Trump step out of the way later on and let Cruz ride his wave into the White House?

If you think about it, Cruz is a good substitute for the underperforming Rand Paul. Like Paul, he has a Tea Party background; like Paul, he is into Austrian Economics; and like Paul, he is an Establishment stooge. It doesn’t take long looking into Cruz’s background to see his ties with the Bush family and his wife’s ties with Wall Street and Goldman Sachs.

Now that we’ve had a look at the likely instigator of a shutdown, let’s turn our attention to the next obvious question…

How long would the government shutdown last?

Although even a one day shutdown would be damaging to America’s image, they’d most likely draw it out until after the October 9-11 IMF/World Bank meeting. It’s even possible they might string it out all month long. That way, it would run right into the early-November debt limit controversy too.

So with the outline of the Jesuit-orchestrated shutdown plot laid bare before us, we now wait and see if they have the balls to pull the trigger. The first hint will be if a new Planned Parenthood video is released tomorrow. Up until just recently, I’d been tracking the globalist agenda from a purely secular perspective. I viewed all the prophetic nonsense as a sideshow, and I simply didn’t believe the globalists would be so dumb as to try to carry them out. A government shutdown after the Pope’s visit, however, will be strong evidence that they’re really trying to put on an End Times show (as part of the NWO rollout), and that’s a good thing for us. Attempting to animate the prophecies would be a strategic blunder of monumental proportions. The internet is going to eat these dinosaurs alive.

For more information on the End Times scenarios they might throw at us, see Obama and the 2nd Coming. To see Austrian Economics’ connection to the banksters, see Update 14 and Update 15. And to understand the motives behind the creation of the TEA Party, read this excerpt from my old blog…

(Addendum 1 – 22 September 2015)

So they went to some lengths to be sure that the Pope arrived at the 4 o’clock hour, the hour of death…

…And he encountered the President of the US during that hour, so that part has gone as expected. (Source: The Atlantic)

The Catholic-run “Center for Medical Progress” didn’t release a new Planned Parenthood video today, though. They could be saving it for tomorrow in order to show America’s sins during the day of Yom Kippur, or they might forego the release altogether. A new video release isn’t essential to the plot, and by having the CMP sit this out, the Catholic hand pushing the whole shutdown situation will be less evident. We shall see.

(Addendum 2 – 23 September 2015)

After surveying the media articles released over the last 24 hours, I’ve not detected any negative news coming out of the White House meeting. So it appears the Pope and Obama played it cool. Conservatives, however, have continued to harp on Obama’s disrespect…

…From The Daily Caller

A cattle call, eh? Well here’s one of the cows…

…from Slate.com

Since it is the conservatives who are threatening to shut down the government, it’s significant that they’re keeping the issue alive.

One notable bit of news that did come out of the Pope’s White House visit was his emphasis on climate change, which demonstrates the underlying New World Order agenda driving his visit to the US. Carbon caps are essential to the UN’s global control plans as they transition from their “Millennium Development Goals” to their “Sustainable Development Goals” at the end of this year…

…From the UN website

Just as we have seen with the federal government here in the US, hyped-up environmental crises will be tool the UN will use to intrude on every aspect of every life on Earth. So while the sleepers line the parade route and cheer the smiley-faced head of the Beast religion, he is preparing the chains of their bondage.

Switching gears a bit, China’s President Xi landed in Washington state on the same day the Pope landed in Washington, D.C. Can you guess who he met that evening?…

…From The New York Times

(Addendum 3 – 23 September 2015)

According to a Think Progress article titled USDA Does Not Have The Cash To Keep Food Stamps Running If The Government Shuts Down…

>>> Tens of millions of vulnerable Americans would lose their food stamps benefits if Republicans bent on defunding Planned Parenthood force the second government shutdown of the Obama era next week, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) warned on Tuesday.

Unlike the 2013 shutdown when cash reserves allowed Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to be disbursed as normal, “USDA will not have the funding necessary for SNAP benefits in October and will be forced to stop providing benefits within the first several days of October,” a spokeswoman told the Associated Press. The agency notified state SNAP administrators on Friday that they should not begin the process of doling out October’s food stamps dollars this week as they normally would. <<<

Should the government shut down and the food stamps get turned off, be on the lookout for another nationally publicized “white cop kills unarmed black person” incident. If you want to start a sh*tstorm in America, that’s the way to do it.

(Addendum 4 – 24 September 2015)

So far this week, we’ve seen no new Planned Parenthood video from the “Center for Medical Progress.” This is despite the fact that they have about a half dozen additional videos and this week and next are the most strategic times to release a couple of them. And we’ve heard only fleeting mentions of abortion in the Pope’s speeches to US bishops and to Congress:

> In his speech to the bishops, he devoted only 5 words to abortion…

“The innocent victim of abortion, children who die of hunger or from bombings, immigrants who drown in the search for a better tomorrow, the elderly or the sick who are considered a burden, the victims of terrorism, wars, violence and drug trafficking, the environment devastated by man’s predatory relationship with nature – at stake in all of this is the gift of God, of which we are noble stewards but not masters. It is wrong, then, to look the other way or to remain silent.”

> And in his speech to Congress, he devoted just one sentence to it before swiftly changing the subject to the death penalty…

“The Golden Rule also reminds us of our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every stage of its development.”

So are the Jesuits backing off of the shutdown or merely trying to hide their hand in causing it?

It’s also interesting that even if a continuing resolution is passed, it will keep the government open only till December 11 (hmmm… who would have guessed it’d be on an 11…). So not only would we face this drama now, we’d also face the debt limit drama in early November and a repeat of this budget drama in December. They are setting us up for continuous turmoil.

On another note, take a look at the Drudge Report headlines from yesterday (Yom Kippur)…

…and today…

…So we can see that the Jewish Matt Drudge is following the Judeo-Christian prophecy script: “America is called to atone on the 23rd and is rebuked on the 24th.”

Oh, and let’s not forget the little bit of symbolism we were shown with this photo that shows Obama with “horns”…

…but I’m sure the picture was totally accidental… twice…

Of course, this isn’t the first time we’ve seen such a suggestive accident…

When I see crap like this, it reminds me of how silly the whole prophecy thing is. It is pabulum for children manufactured by juvenile pranksters.

(Addendum 5 – 25 September 2015)

On the day after the Pope’s speech before Congress, House Speaker John Boehner, a devout Catholic, announces his resignation effective at the end of October – a mere coincidence, I’m sure. This clears the way for him to seek Democratic help in passing a clean continuing resolution without worrying about the political consequences. And this means the House will pass a stopgap spending bill without any cuts to Planned Parenthood.

On the Senate side, there is talk that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell “could do away with the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster, as Democratic Leader Harry Reid did for judicial appointments.” This means that Ted Cruz would be unable to block a clean bill from passing the Senate. So it looks like they’ve backed off of a shutdown until December 11, and there is something worth noting about that…

As we saw on the UN graphic from Addendum 2, the UN is aiming to reach two key agreements before the end of this year: 1) the agreement to adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda, and 2) an agreement on Climate Change (which is necessary to make the Post-2015 Development Agenda work). This being so…

> Why is the US locked in this government shutdown drama as the UN is adopting the Post-2015 Development Agenda at its summit today through Sunday?

> Why will the US be locked in another government shutdown drama as the UN holds its Climate Change Conference in Paris from November 30 to December 11 (the day the new continuing resolution is set to expire)?

Could their objective be this…

…(from Google News) Note how the headline is about Boehner and the shutdown, not the UN agenda.

So is the shutdown drama a circus show intended to draw our attention away from the UN’s consolidation of power?

(Addendum 6 – 26 September 2015)

During this morning’s infoscan, I came across a scenario in a Bloomberg Business article which sounds about right…

“For years, there has been speculation that Boehner would strike a grand compromise with Obama and the Democrats and then resign. The first part of that — a push for a grand bargain on tax and entitlement spending, as he tried to negotiate in 2011 – – is probably out of reach given the proximity of the next elections.

More in realm of possibility before Boehner leaves is a smaller agreement, perhaps on the debt ceiling and reviving the Export-Import Bank. If not, all bets are off.”

An intention to push the delay button on the debt limit fiasco is a good explanation for Boehner timing his resignation for the end of October. And this means we’ll also see little movement at the IMF/World Bank meeting and the G20 Summit this year. Once the globalists have secured the UN Climate Agreement on December 11, though, we face another real risk of a government shutdown on December 12. Some kind of big crisis is necessary at some point, because they need an excuse to write off the excessive debt in the system in order to start a new growth/harvest cycle. A crisis beginning in mid-December would be a good way to kick off the Post-2015 Development Agenda in January of 2016.

P.S. – I have updated the NWO Schedule of Implementation page to Mod 1.91.

P.S. – Let me also add that a risk remains that the Fed will hike the interest rate at the end of October (this would fulfill the infamous cover from the Economist magazine). Such a move would start an economic crisis that a December 12 government shutdown would complement quite well.

(Addendum 7 – 27 September 2015)

As the UN is having its September 25-27 Summit to finalize their Post-2015 Development Agenda right before the Super Blood Moon this evening, another meeting worth noting is taking place during the same timeframe…

…(From ValuesVoterSummit.org)

You may have heard in the news that Ted Cruz, the man who is pushing for the government shutdown over Planned Parenthood funding, won their Presidential poll…

…(From The Hill)

Upon seeing this, I got the urge to check on Cruz’s stance on the Audit the Fed bill, and I found out that he has tied himself to that issue also…

…(From The New York Times)

So when the “Fed Mistake” finally becomes front page news (perhaps after an October rate hike?), he can use his co-sponsorship of the bill to ride the “we warned you about the Fed” popularity wave along with Rand Paul. Earlier in this update, we saw that he is also riding Donald Trump’s popularity wave by teaming up with him on opposing the Iran nuclear deal…

…(From NBC News – Watch the video to see how Cruz threatens Iran at the 24 second mark.)

Viewing all this, it is becoming pretty clear that the Establishment has sidelined Rand Paul and is pushing Ted Cruz as their preferred candidate instead. Whether we’ll end up with a Trump/Cruz Presidential ticket or a Cruz ticket after a Trump bow-out is hard to say, but I would lean towards the latter right now.

Another thing worth noting about the Values Voter Summit is the heavy presence of Jewish speakers, including talk show host Mark Levin and Judeo-Christian prophecy propagandists Joel C. Rosenberg…

…(From You Tube – Watch this section)…

…and Jonathan Cahn…

…(From WND.com)

So how interesting is it that we see real-world politics mixing with Biblical prophecy during this remarkable week? And how interesting is it that Cruz is threatening Iran over nukes when that is a centerpiece of the prophetic unfolding the globalists are directing? If you haven’t yet read Obama and the 2nd Coming, it is imperative that you do. Foreknowledge of their plot is inoculation against the Great Deception.

(Addendum 8 – 30 September 2015)

Out of an overabundance of caution, I decided to leave this entry at the top until the continuing resolution has been passed by the Congress and signed by Obama. At that point, I’ll make some closing remarks and move on to the next entry, which came to me when I saw this on The Federalist…

So Ted Cruz is riding the Trump train, eh? And he is gushing over Pope Francis? I’ll get into the significance of these two things in my next article, which will be the start of a new Globalist Prophecy Watch series. From now on, I’ll be monitoring the prophecy front with the same focus I put on monitoring the globalist political and economic institutions. By watching both the secular and religious sides and integrating the information, I hope to be able to expose their agenda with even greater accuracy. In the first installment of the new series, I’ll cover the two Christian propaganda fronts that are serving to set up the 3-Step Deception I talked about in “Obama and the 2nd Coming,” and I’ll show you which step Ted Cruz is part of.

If the 3-Step Deception is truly in motion as I suspect, my past writings on the phony East/West NWO dialectic only served to expose Step 2, which is something they were going to do eventually anyway. But with my upcoming writings on Step 3, I might finally be entering the realm of really fu*king their sh*t up. So it will be interesting to see how it all plays out over the next year.

We have a year to ruin their plans for next September. Here’s to fu*king sh*t up…

(P.S. – 30 September 2015) – One of my readers is convinced that I’m being too hasty in overlooking Rand Paul and focusing on Ted Cruz, and that’s entirely possible. As I tracked the NWO from a secular point of view, Rand looked more like their man. He is hanging back and being the “reasonable statesman” who is not overly attentive to Israel and is oriented towards peace. Looking at it from a prophetic viewpoint, though, Ted looks more tailor-made for the role (plus he’s an Establishment darling).

Given that Ted is the man of the hour (and also given that I’ve found some interesting information on him), I’ll write about him for a while. But rest assured that I’m not done with the Pauls. A long-delayed entry on Ron and Rand sits as notes on my PC, and I’ll get around to writing it over the next several weeks. I also purchased Donald Trump’s book, Time to get tough: Making America #1 again, and I’ll write about that too. When all is said and done, it might turn out that he ran for President just to sell more of these books; they released the paperback edition on August 31. It makes me sick that I had to waste my money on it. The things I do for love…

(Addendum 9 – 30 September 2015)

Now that the funding bill has been passed and signed, it’s time for the…

With a Papal visit occurring, a government shutdown looming, and a complete stopping of federal Planned Parenthood funding within arm’s reach, who would have thought that Jesuit front group “The Center for Medical Progress” would have stayed silent and not released a provocative video? A video release could have led to the Pope adding a simple statement to his address to Congress: “We must not turn a blind eye to the greed that has caused the desecration of the aborted innocents.” And such a statement would have induced the weepily devout Boehner into allowing the shutdown to go forward. Instead, though, Boehner met with the Pope, cried, and resigned the very next day.

Why did they blink? What’s their next move? We’ll explore that in an upcoming entry.

For the previous updates from this series, click here.

Love always…

[Update 71]

While researching for an entry on the financial system takedown, I came across a rather interesting document: Gold, the renminbi and the multi-currency reserve system. Here is a snippet from its foreword…

…(Take note of the expectation of “twin shocks” from the dollar and euro.)

The author of this foreword, Baron Desai…

…of the notorious London School of Economics, has a rather interesting pedigree. From Wikipedia…

“Meghnad Jagdishchandra Desai, Baron Desai (born 10 July 1940) is an Indian-born, naturalised British economist and Labour politician. He unsuccessfully stood for the Speaker in the British House of Lords in 2011, the first ever non-UK born candidate to do so…

Currently, he is chairman of the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum (OMFIF) Advisory Board, an independent membership-driven research network. It focuses on global policy and investment themes for off the record public and private sector engagement and analysis…

 He was made a life peer as Baron Desai, of St Clement Danes in the City of Westminster, in April 1991 [a “life peer” is someone who has been granted a non-hereditary title of nobility by the British “royals”]…

In 2003, he retired as Director of the Centre for the Study of global governance, which he founded in 1992 at the London School of Economics (LSE), where he is now Professor Emeritus.”

So this is a guy who is in deep with the globalist London Establishment. That makes what he suggests in this foreword all the more interesting. After establishing the East versus West dialectic for his readers, he goes on to say this…

“I favour extending the SDR to include the R-currencies – the renminbi, rupee, real, rand and rouble – with the addition of gold. This would be a form of indexation to add to the SDR’s attractiveness. Gold would not need to be paid out, but its dollar or renminbi or rouble equivalent would be if the SDR had a gold content. By moving counter-cyclically to the dollar, gold could improve the stabilising properties of the SDR. Particularly if the threats to the dollar and the euro worsen, a large SDR issue improved by some gold content and the R-currencies may be urgently required.”

This just goes to show what a scripted farce the whole East versus West conflict has been. Here is a high-level London Establishment minion calling for the BRICS currencies and gold to be added to the SDR basket, and he even broaches the subject of the inclusion being done urgently if a problem develops with the dollar and euro. Of course, none of this is a surprise to you if you are a longtime reader of this blog. Here is an excerpt from Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 14 – The coming BRICS gold standard, Ron Paul, and the Rockefellers…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>> I just came across a Zerohedge article titled “Is Russia Planning A Gold-Based Currency?” To give a simple answer to the question posed by the title, “yes,” both Russia and China (and possibly other BRICS allies) are planning to go to a partial gold backing for their currencies. And once they do, the globalist propaganda organs will laud the move as “the masterstroke that peacefully defeated the Western banksters.”

The (globalist orchestrated) BRICS move towards a partial gold standard goes beyond their own national currencies, though. To “save the international financial system from cataclysm,” they will also offer a portion of their gold reserves to back the IMF’s SDR, and they will receive a large allotment of SDRs in return. This “gold for SDRs” strategy was hinted at in a (UK) Royal Institute of International Affairs paper titled Adding Gold into the Valuation of the SDR…

According to the globalist script, in return for “saving the IMF and the international financial system” with their gold, the BRICS (particularly China) will demand sweeping governance reforms of the IMF and the rest of the UN Complex, as well as a Chinese IMF head. The Chinese would then “own” the New World Order system in the way that George Soros described back in 2009 (if you haven’t read the linked article, please do so; you’ll find it complements this one quite nicely). <<< END EXCERPT

And here is a relevant excerpt from Globalist Agenda Watch 2015: Update 16 – The BRICS and the UN governance reform scam…

“Once we reach the Transition Point in which another Lehman-type crisis is staged and the dollar is taken down as the main global reserve currency, many (if not all) of the BRICS currencies will be added to the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights currency basket, and many (if not all) of the BRICS nations will take seats as permanent members of the UNSC.”

[Update 72 – 14 September 2015]

More Crisis Clues from the Economist

Back in Update 4, I showed this graphic from the Economist’s famous 2015 cover…

…It shows the Federal Reserve kicking off a financial panic.

And during this morning’s infoscan, I ran across an entry on the Investment Watch Blog that unlocks some more of the symbolism from the cover…

> At the bottom left, it shows the world as a football sitting on a tee. And when do footballs sit on tees? During kickoffs. So I would agree that this shows the world’s “big game” kicking off during football season (which itself kicked off this week).

> At the top right, it shows a ghost together with the word “holiday.” Given all the talk I’ve heard on Daystar TV about the Jubilee Year…

…(which starts this September and ends next September and will supposedly bring war in the Middle East and the restoration of Israel) and the four blood moons (the last of which occurs late this month), I would agree that this indicates the old system becoming a ghost during that timeframe.

> At the bottom right, there is a different interpretation I would offer. It shows a Sumo wrestler (which is Japanese, not Chinese) holding a battery (which represents power). So if you pair a muscle-bound Chinese panda bear with an Asian wrestler holding a battery, it might represent Asia holding the power.

(P.S. – 15 September 2015)

One of our brothers across the Pond has told me that the football at the bottom left is actually a rugby ball, and the Rugby World Cup starts this week (the day after the Fed announcement in fact)…

…This would explain why the ball looks like the world.

The Rugby World Cup (RWC) is held once every four years, so was its inclusion on the cover simply a reference to its taking place this year? Possibly so, but the fact that it physically overlaps the panic board is suggestive of a dual meaning. If you take a look at the panic board, as the plinko puck begins to fall from the Federal Reserve, two shadows are being cast on the board, those of the RWC and China. This seems to suggest that the panic is set in motion by the Fed in the shadow of the RWC and something related to China (perhaps their recent market turmoil).

(P.S. – 15 September 2015)

A reader pointed out this article that showed up on the BBC today…

…and it is yet another example of the plethora of warnings we’ve seen out of the multilateral institutions in September, such as this one from the BIS…

…and this one from the IMF…

…(Source: FT – enter the title in Google News search to read it)

The fact that the mainstream media are plastering so many multilateral warnings about the rate hike is evidence for the “yes, they will hike” argument.

If you are a new reader, I offer this insight into their strategy from the NWO Schedule of Implementation page…

>>> A core component of the globalists’ strategy to centralize power over the world’s currencies lies in making the Fed and their other national central banks look bad. For this reason, they’ve been deliberately staging “currency wars” and having their supranational institutions (the IMF and the BIS) and media propagandists point out the destructive nature of the policies being pursued at the national level. “Only at the international level,” they argue, “can currency stability be achieved.”

In keeping with this strategy, they are using their national central banks to blow up the global economy so their supranational institutions can step forward and restore order. And as they transition power from the national to the supranational level, they will close down the Fed and other central banks in order to transfer control of national currencies to their respective treasury departments. Since the central banksters have consolidated power over the national governments, they can safely move their “flag” from the central banks to the treasuries. The treasuries are run by their people anyhow.

So when you hear alternative media propaganda about “ending the Fed” and “bringing back a US Treasury dollar,” know that this is the solution the banksters want you to embrace. It is a solution designed to make it appear that the problem posed by the “evil Western central bankers” has been licked, but it’s just a scam. And in the US, Ron and Rand Paul are the primary controlled-opposition agents the globalists have designated to con you. <<< END EXCERPT

I might add to this that Donald Trump will almost certainly jump on the “Blame the Fed” bandwagon. He may be the pinch hitter assigned to take the place of an underperforming Rand Paul, or as a reader has suggested, he may do something later that makes Rand look much more appealing to the voters.

[Update 73 – 16 September 2015]

The Pope’s US visit was scheduled according to prophecy

Yesterday, I got the urge to listen further into the Jonathan Cahn video, and I’m glad I did. He goes on to state that the “Jubilee Year” will begin on Yom Kippur…

And who will arrive in Washington, D.C. just three hours before Yom Kippur begins at sunset? The King of the Roman Empire, of course…

As my longtime readers know, I regard numerology and astrology as spiritually absurd, self-fulfilling silliness. The “elite,” however, love the stuff, and the Pope’s arrival is pregnant with numerological, astrological, and prophetic meaning.

The Pope’s arrival in Washington, D.C. is scheduled for September 22 at 4 PM, and he will be met at the plane by Barack Obama. Given the contextual backdrop of an Asia-centered world order battling it out with a Western-centered world order, the 4 o’clock arrival is significant. In Asian numerology, 4 is considered the number of death, so the Pope will arrive in D.C. and meet Obama at the Hour of Death. The significance of the date, September 22, is also worth noting. From the NWO Schedule of Implementation page…

>>> “22″ is a Masonic “Master Number” and “because of its great power, the number 22 may result in outstanding ascendancy or disastrous downfall,” according to the numerologically-inclined. [Kennedy died on a 22 (Nov 22)] <<<

So the Pope and Obama will face each other on a date that symbolizes disastrous downfall and at an hour that symbolizes death. Three hours after that, at 7:06 PM (7+6=13), the Sun will set over Washington and Yom Kippur will begin. And what is the significance of Yom Kippur? According to Wikipedia…

…so you can imagine the fate a nation will suffer for the next year if it doesn’t atone for its sins on that day. Do you think Obama will atone?

Of course, this is no ordinary, run-of-the-mill Yom Kippur. According to the Judeo-Christian eschatologists, this one marks the beginning of a special Jubilee Year that will bring war to the Middle East and Israel (just think of the Russian and Iranian forces that are supposedly now in Syria, which borders Israel) and will end in the “restoration of Jerusalem.”

On top of all this, there is also the fact that the Autumn Equinox will take place a mere twelve hours (at 4:21 AM ET on the 23rd) after the Pope’s arrival. I wrote about this in the NWO Schedule of Implementation…

>>> The Pope will arrive in Washington, D.C. to covertly and symbolically remove the crown of world leadership from the US for its transfer to the UN. He will arrive in the evening to signify the end of “America’s Day,” and the Fall Equinox will occur during that night. So when the Pope visits Obama on the 23rd, this can be said: “The Fall (of the ‘American Empire’) begins the day the Pope visits the White House.” <<<

So is it mere coincidence that the Pope’s visit coincides with all these numerological, astrological, and prophetic elements? Not bloody likely. What, then, does it all mean? As I wrote in a previous entry, this is what I suspect it symbolizes…

The Pope’s arrival on the 22nd at 4 PM marks the symbolic death of the American-led Interim World Order (the post-WW II Bretton Woods arrangement). And just like Christ supposedly rose on the 3rd day after his death, the New World Order will symbolically rise on the 3rd day after the Interim World Order’s death (when the Pope speaks before the United Nations on the 25th).

His speech comes on the first day of the “United Nations Sustainable Development Summit 2015″…

…which was renamed from the “United Nations Summit to Adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda”…

…because it sounded too suspicious (like they were deliberately planning a 2015 economic collapse which would necessitate a “Post-2015 Development Agenda”).

To prepare yourself for the weirdness you might see as we go through the Jubilee Year, I recommend you read Obama and the 2nd Coming if you haven’t already. It explains why war tensions might lead to a nuclear launch a year from now, and how “divine intervention” might be staged to stop the missiles and “restore Jerusalem.”

(P.S. – 16 September 2015)

Speaking of “Obama the Antichrist,” have a look at this report from Breitbart…

…Here are some quotes…

>>> President Obama will apparently test just how far Pope Francis’ notorious tolerance will go by inviting a rogue’s gallery of people opposed to Catholic teaching to greet the pontiff at the White House during his visit next week.

In a stunning show of political indecorum, Obama has invited a series of individuals who publicly flout Catholic teaching, including a pro-abortion religious sister, a transgender woman and the first openly gay Episcopal bishop, along with at least two Catholic gay activists…

Though Pope Francis has said that he doesn’t believe in judging persons and is ready to welcome anyone in Christ’s name, he has also said that Catholics do not accept the modern mentality of transgenderism and once said that gay marriage is the devil’s “attempt to destroy God’s plan.” <<<

So much for atoning, eh? It looks like Obama is doubling down instead. Mind you, this White House meeting will occur in the morning of the 23rd during Yom Kippur. It’s a great little show of scripted conflict between the “Antichrist leading the evil Western NWO” and the Pope who will side with “Christ’s BRICS NWO.”

(P.S. – 17 September 2015)

Here’s one that made me chuckle…

…It is a story out of BRICS NWO propaganda mill King World News, and it tells of the Economist magazine warning that a Fed rate hike is premature. KWN specifically mentions China’s stock market troubles in connection to this.

This brings us right back again to the Economist cover from the beginning of the year…

…which shows the Fed setting a panic in motion in the shadow of China (and also in the shadow of Friday’s Rugby World Cup). Should they pull the trigger on the rate hike (or a shock QE) today, this cover will be used as a propaganda tool to point out “the treachery of the Western elite” in support of the BRICS cause.

For the previous updates from this series, click here.

Much love…

There was something in the World Bank’s recent warning about a Fed rate hike that caught my eye: it specifically mentioned that a rate hike would trigger “panic and turmoil” in the emerging market economies (the economies the BRICS Alliance was created to capture). On a hunch, I decided to check on the status of the BRICS’ Contingent Reserve Fund, and I found this…

So just 11 days prior to the September 16-17 FOMC Meeting, the BRICS announce that the Contingent Reserve Arrangement is fully operational. Interesting. Equally as interesting is the last paragraph of the article…

“As the BRICS countries launched new financial institutions like the $100 billion BRICS Bank, the China-led Asia Infrastructure Investment Bank, and a $100 billion BRICS currency reserve fund, the IMF has once again delayed voting reforms to give emerging countries greater say.”

Are you beginning to see a strategy at play?…

1) The Fed hikes rates to set off panic and turmoil in the emerging market economies (EMEs).

2) The EMEs run to the now fully functioning BRICS institutions for help (per the globalist design).

3) The “Coalition of the Pissed” gang up to demand immediate action on the IMF’s governance reforms.

But will they set these dominoes falling next week? We’ll know soon enough.

For the previous updates in this series, click here.

Love always…

With just a week to go until the September FOMC meeting, all eyes are on the Fed and their interest rate decision. So what will she say this time?…

On the “no, they won’t hike” side of the argument, we’ve seen the globalists delay a whole series of things they had planned for this year…

> They delayed the Greek switchover to the BRICS and the trainwreck that would have resulted within the EU.

> They delayed the IMF’s decision on adding the renminbi to the SDR basket till next September.

> They delayed the US handover of the internet until next September.

…so it is conceivable that they’ll delay the rate hike also.

But on the “yes, they will hike” side of the argument,..

> We are hearing the “Fed mistake” language I’ve been warning about for so long…

…from Zero Hedge

> We have seen the World Bank join the chorus of “wise” multilateral organizations warning against a September rate hike, thus setting themselves up to look like prescient geniuses after the rate hike triggers the Next Lehman Moment.

> We have seen no movement on addressing the potential government shutdown at the end of this month, which suggests that part of the agenda is still in play for this year. Since a combination of a Fed Mistake and a US government shutdown is perfect grist for the globalist propaganda mill, the rate hike is also likely still in play – for the moment.

So as we proceed through this month, it is useful to track the rate hike and the government shutdown together. If the Fed delays the rate hike next Thursday, you can expect to see a Congressional agreement on a stopgap funding measure to keep the government going for a few more months. If, on the other hand, the rate is hiked, the government will definitely shut down as well.

(P.S. – 10 September 2015) – For those of you wondering why I’ve suddenly taken on the task of dismantling the Christian religion, it all has to do with the Obama and the 2nd Coming article I recently wrote. If the globalists really are batsh*t crazy enough to stage a Second Coming to install a One World Dictator, it is imperative to destroy the Christ myth they will use to give him cover.

The difficult thing about fighting the globalist agenda is that they are great contingency planners. Whenever you move to block one of their plans, they always have fallback plans they can activate to keep moving forward. If you think about it, pursuing their agenda is much like taking a road trip from Point A in New York to Point B in Los Angeles: there are a million different ways to get from Point A to Point B, so if you try to block the road they’re traveling on, they can simply change roads and keep on truckin’. The one thing they can’t change, though, is their destination. So if you build a fence around Point B, they can’t reach their destination regardless of which route they take.

For the globalists, it appears that their “Point B” might be installing a theocratic world leader clothed in the myth of Christ. So if we can shred the myth of Christ before they can put forward their leader, we have denied them their destination. You can’t put a wolf in sheep’s clothing if the sheep costume has been shredded beyond repair. Everyone will see the wolf for what he is. And this is why I’ve taken on this new subject.

If any of the historical accounts are to be believed, Christianity was just another insignificant cult before the Occulted Powers of ancient Rome decided to use it as a universal religious control mechanism for their Empire. It was they who codified it, made it mainstream, and spread it around the world. And it is they who will attempt to bring the prophecies (along with their dreams of worldwide dominion) to fruition. But like any other big lie, the Christ myth is ever-teetering on the brink of implosion. To knock it down, you just have to know exactly how and where to hit it.

For the previous updates from this series, click here.

With love…

This report came out in the Wall Street Journal today: U.S. Delays Giving Up Oversight of Internet Administrator Icann…

“The U.S. Commerce Department on Monday delayed for at least a year its plans to give up oversight of a key component of Internet governance…

Last year, the Obama administration said it planned to transfer Icann oversight to an unspecified group of international stakeholders by September 2015.”

Since placing the internet under “multilateral” control is a key milestone in the NWO’s implementation, this delay is potentially significant. Putting it beside the potential delay in the IMF’s new SDR basket and the talk of delay in the Fed’s interest rate “normalization,” we again face an important question…

Are these delays signs that the globalists are putting off the “Big Move” till 2016, or are they just giving an abundance of justifications / propaganda ammunition to the BRICS in advance of a 2015 move against the US?

This question will be answered next month. Another punt from the Fed on raising interest rates and a deal in Congress that keeps the government running another 6-12 months will be clear signals that the Big Move has been rescheduled for 2016. But should the Fed raise rates or the government shut down, it’s still game on for 2015.

[Update 68 – 18 August 2015]

Are delays in passing bail-in rules the reason things have been pushed back?

During this morning’s infoscan, I came across this: Greek Deposits Become Eligible For Bail-In On January 1, 2016. And this brought to mind something I saw a few months ago: EU regulators tell 11 countries to adopt bank bail-in rules. Here is an excerpt (with a comment added in brackets)…

>>> The European Commission on Thursday gave France, Italy and nine other EU countries two months to adopt new EU rules on propping up failed banks or face legal action.

The rules, known as the bank recovery and resolution directive (BRRD), seek to shield taxpayers from having to bail out troubled lenders, forcing creditors [depositors are now considered “unsecured creditors”] and shareholders to contribute to the rescue in a process known as “bail-in”. <<<

Since this article is dated May 28, the nations were supposed to pass the new rules by the end of July. Is their failure to do so the reason we are seeing all the talk of delays? It stands to reason that the globalists will want to confiscate all the money they can when they pull the plug on the old system, so they want all the bail-in rules in place before they make the Big Move.

If you live in France, Italy, or one of the nine other nations that hadn’t passed the BRRD rules by May 28, let me know if it has passed yet in your nation and if so, when it takes effect. Send a link to a news report if you can. I can be contacted from the About Me page.

(P.S. – 18 August 2015) – Italy passed it on or about July 3: Italy approves EU “bail-in” measure for bank rescue. But the article offers no implementation date.

(P.S. – 18 August 2015) – I tracked down the original press release from the European Commission, and these are the nations they called out: the Czech Republic, France, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Malta, Poland, Romania and Sweden.

(P.S. – 18 August 2015) – Since finding the answer of which nations have adopted BRRD is proving difficult, I’ve decided to go straight to the source. I’ve contacted the European Commission via email and should receive a response in about 3 days.

For the previous updates in this series, click here.

Much love…

Let’s take a second look at a section from Update 19…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

…I take you back to the 1961 NWO blueprint book Prospect for America. This is from page 26…

The globalists want the NWO to consist of “smaller units” because smaller nations are less likely to be self-sufficient in maintaining their security and a modern standard of living. They want all the nations to be dependent on the multilateral framework for their security and economic wellbeing.

Besides the Rockefellers’ NWO architects, can you guess who else is talking about “smaller units”? Ron Paul (in this interview on RT)…

“I happen to believe in smaller units of government; the larger the unit of government, the worse things are…

So I think people should have the right to leave a larger unit of government.”

And what else is Ron Paul talking about? Secession in the US…

…Note that he gave this speech at a Mises Institute conference called Breaking Away: The Case for Secession…

[Starting from the 1:20 mark] – “I would like to start off by talking about the subject, and the subject, of course, is secession and nullification — the breaking up of government. And the good news is it’s gonna happen. It’s happening. And it’s not gonna be because there will be enough people in the US Congress to legislate it — it won’t happen. It will be de facto.”

So we know the globalists are aiming to break up the EU (which is the Interim World Order in Europe), and Greece is where that will begin. But will they also break up the USA so it can never rise again as the power it once was? Will Russia and China meet the same fate at some point?

<<<END EXCERPT

With that last question in mind, have a look at an Economist article I ran across today…

…”UNDER Vladimir Putin’s presidency, Russia is seen in the outside world as an expansionist power trying to revise post-Soviet borders and rebuild an empire. But what if Russia itself—a country of nearly 200 nationalities that stretches across 11 time zones—is in danger of crumbling?”

It is quite interesting to see this coming out of the Economist. If we look back to the their infamous cover from early this year, we see Putin (and other major leaders including America’s Obama, China’s Xi, and India’s Modi) presented in the color of ash….

…which is the color of the phoenix eggs on the woman’s hat. This would indicate that those leaders will be part of the ash heap from which the NWO phoenix will rise.

After seeing the Economist article, I decided to check into China and came across this Wall Street Journal article…

…”Despite appearances, China’s political system is badly broken, and nobody knows it better than the Communist Party itself. China’s strongman leader, Xi Jinping, is hoping that a crackdown on dissent and corruption will shore up the party’s rule. He is determined to avoid becoming the Mikhail Gorbachev of China, presiding over the party’s collapse. But instead of being the antithesis of Mr. Gorbachev, Mr. Xi may well wind up having the same effect. His despotism is severely stressing China’s system and society—and bringing it closer to a breaking point.”

Interesting.

Upon checking into India, I came across this academia.edu paper from Arshi Saleem Hashmi. Here is a germane passage…


…(from pages 38-39)

It makes sense that the globalists will want to break up the large nations because it fits in to their PR strategy of restoring the appearance of sovereignty (while actually undermining sovereignty by making the divided peoples less able to resist the power of the globalist institutions). Once separated from their central governments, the newly-minted nations will need assistance in getting started, and to whom will they turn for guidance and help? To the United Nations and the multilateral institutions of course! They will turn away from the old power centers of Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and New Delhi and turn towards the new power center, the UN Complex. And this predictable dynamic gives us a clue as to the timeframe during which the breakups will occur.

Common sense suggests that the great nations will be broken up once the multilateral institutions and agreements that will pick up the pieces are finalized. That way, when they break up into their smaller components, those components will be offered continued membership in the multilateral institutions their former central governments set up. And since they’ll need help, they’ll accept that continued membership and thus become dependent on the UN and the regional and functional multilateral institutions (just like the Rockefellers planned back in the 1950’s). Given that the BRICS institutions have been rushed into existence this year, I would expect the breakups to occur sometime between September of this year and 2020, with most of it done by 2018.

I’ll continue to keep an eye on all this.

[Update 66 – 6 August 2015]

Why are the globalists talking about delaying the new SDR currency basket?

A watershed moment in the contrived East versus West dialectic will be the inclusion of China’s renminbi into the IMF’s SDR currency basket. The globalists had planned to do it this October, but an IMF staff report that came out this week calls for a 9-month delay in implementing any changes. From the IMF website…

“IMF Survey: Why is staff proposing an extension of the current SDR basket?

Tiwari: To put this in context, the current SDR basket expires at the end of this year. We are proposing extending the current SDR basket by nine months until September 30, 2016. This is in response to feedback from SDR users on the desirability of avoiding changes in the basket at the end of the calendar year and facilitating continued smooth functioning of SDR-related operations. An extension of nine months would also allow users to adjust to a potential changed basket composition should the Executive Board decide to include the RMB.

The proposed extension, which will be decided by the Executive Board later this month, would not in any way prejudge the timing of conclusion or outcome of the review.”

In addition to this talk of a delay, the staff report questions whether the renminbi is sufficiently “freely usable” to be included in the basket.

So what is their game? Is this merely more propaganda fodder to set up the US versus China showdown later this year, or are the globalists pushing the delay button on their plans and setting up for a dramatic September next year?

I’ll be having a close look at the IMF and press reports to get a feel for what they’re up to.

(P.S. – 10 August 2015) – I ran across this Zero Hedge article this morning: Why Goldman Is Confident The Fed Will Wait To Hike Until December (At Least). It lays out the public propaganda rationale for the Fed delaying its rate increase till December or even next year. If you pair this with the possible postponement of the new IMF SDR basket, it increasingly appears that the globalists may be pushing the delay button on their agenda.

Lately, I’ve also been wondering if Donald Trump has been designated to take the place of Rand Paul as the Establishment’s preferred “anti-establishment” candidate. Rand Paul, like his Mises Mafia compatriot Panos Kammenos in Greece, doesn’t appear to be getting the traction the globalists had hoped for. If Trump starts talking about “sound money,” look out.

On a personal note, I apologize for my dearth of writings over the past few weeks. My grandmother’s visit has turned into a permanent stay, so I will be her caretaker also for the remainder of her stay here on Earth. That makes one son, one grandmother, two dogs, and one former wife I must tend to. My hands are a tad full and my mind a bit scattered right now. Rest assured that I’ll adapt and be fully back on the job at some point in the near future.

Love always…

Reuters is reporting that…

“The U.S. federal government can stay below its legal limit on borrowing until at least late October and likely do so a little longer than that, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said on Wednesday.”

“Late October and a little longer than that” would put the debt limit hit very close to the November 15-16 G20 Summit. Interesting.

So as we cast our gaze upon the US budget / debt limit situation, there are three questions that must be asked…

1) Will the Congress pass a budget for FY 2016 before October 1? Not likely. According to this article about the federal budget from The Fiscal Times, House Speaker John Boehner is already talking about the necessity of passing a continuing resolution to keep the government funded past September 30.

2) Will Congress pass a continuing resolution to avoid a government shutdown? Seeing articles like this makes you wonder…

If it is the globalists’ intention to trigger a US government shutdown prior to the October 9-11 IMF/World Bank Annual Meeting, and I suspect it is, it will be a hot button issue like this that they’ll use for cover. Don’t forget that the Pope will visit the US Congress in late September. What will he have to say about the Planned Parenthood revelations?

3) Will Congress deal with the debt limit before it is hit? I have my doubts. Just imagine how well an October government shutdown (before the IMF meeting) and a November debt limit hit (before the G20 Summit) would set up the UN/IMF/World Bank governance reform agenda.

Much love…