This report came out in the Wall Street Journal today: U.S. Delays Giving Up Oversight of Internet Administrator Icann…

“The U.S. Commerce Department on Monday delayed for at least a year its plans to give up oversight of a key component of Internet governance…

Last year, the Obama administration said it planned to transfer Icann oversight to an unspecified group of international stakeholders by September 2015.”

Since placing the internet under “multilateral” control is a key milestone in the NWO’s implementation, this delay is potentially significant. Putting it beside the potential delay in the IMF’s new SDR basket and the talk of delay in the Fed’s interest rate “normalization,” we again face an important question…

Are these delays signs that the globalists are putting off the “Big Move” till 2016, or are they just giving an abundance of justifications / propaganda ammunition to the BRICS in advance of a 2015 move against the US?

This question will be answered next month. Another punt from the Fed on raising interest rates and a deal in Congress that keeps the government running another 6-12 months will be clear signals that the Big Move has been rescheduled for 2016. But should the Fed raise rates or the government shut down, it’s still game on for 2015.

[Update 68 – 18 August 2015]

Are delays in passing bail-in rules the reason things have been pushed back?

During this morning’s infoscan, I came across this: Greek Deposits Become Eligible For Bail-In On January 1, 2016. And this brought to mind something I saw a few months ago: EU regulators tell 11 countries to adopt bank bail-in rules. Here is an excerpt (with a comment added in brackets)…

>>> The European Commission on Thursday gave France, Italy and nine other EU countries two months to adopt new EU rules on propping up failed banks or face legal action.

The rules, known as the bank recovery and resolution directive (BRRD), seek to shield taxpayers from having to bail out troubled lenders, forcing creditors [depositors are now considered “unsecured creditors”] and shareholders to contribute to the rescue in a process known as “bail-in”. <<<

Since this article is dated May 28, the nations were supposed to pass the new rules by the end of July. Is their failure to do so the reason we are seeing all the talk of delays? It stands to reason that the globalists will want to confiscate all the money they can when they pull the plug on the old system, so they want all the bail-in rules in place before they make the Big Move.

If you live in France, Italy, or one of the nine other nations that hadn’t passed the BRRD rules by May 28, let me know if it has passed yet in your nation and if so, when it takes effect. Send a link to a news report if you can. I can be contacted from the About Me page.

(P.S. – 18 August 2015) – Italy passed it on or about July 3: Italy approves EU “bail-in” measure for bank rescue. But the article offers no implementation date.

(P.S. – 18 August 2015) – I tracked down the original press release from the European Commission, and these are the nations they called out: the Czech Republic, France, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Malta, Poland, Romania and Sweden.

(P.S. – 18 August 2015) – Since finding the answer of which nations have adopted BRRD is proving difficult, I’ve decided to go straight to the source. I’ve contacted the European Commission via email and should receive a response in about 3 days.

For the previous updates in this series, click here.

Much love…

Let’s take a second look at a section from Update 19…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

…I take you back to the 1961 NWO blueprint book Prospect for America. This is from page 26…

The globalists want the NWO to consist of “smaller units” because smaller nations are less likely to be self-sufficient in maintaining their security and a modern standard of living. They want all the nations to be dependent on the multilateral framework for their security and economic wellbeing.

Besides the Rockefellers’ NWO architects, can you guess who else is talking about “smaller units”? Ron Paul (in this interview on RT)…

“I happen to believe in smaller units of government; the larger the unit of government, the worse things are…

So I think people should have the right to leave a larger unit of government.”

And what else is Ron Paul talking about? Secession in the US…

…Note that he gave this speech at a Mises Institute conference called Breaking Away: The Case for Secession…

[Starting from the 1:20 mark] – “I would like to start off by talking about the subject, and the subject, of course, is secession and nullification — the breaking up of government. And the good news is it’s gonna happen. It’s happening. And it’s not gonna be because there will be enough people in the US Congress to legislate it — it won’t happen. It will be de facto.”

So we know the globalists are aiming to break up the EU (which is the Interim World Order in Europe), and Greece is where that will begin. But will they also break up the USA so it can never rise again as the power it once was? Will Russia and China meet the same fate at some point?

<<<END EXCERPT

With that last question in mind, have a look at an Economist article I ran across today…

…”UNDER Vladimir Putin’s presidency, Russia is seen in the outside world as an expansionist power trying to revise post-Soviet borders and rebuild an empire. But what if Russia itself—a country of nearly 200 nationalities that stretches across 11 time zones—is in danger of crumbling?”

It is quite interesting to see this coming out of the Economist. If we look back to the their infamous cover from early this year, we see Putin (and other major leaders including America’s Obama, China’s Xi, and India’s Modi) presented in the color of ash….

…which is the color of the phoenix eggs on the woman’s hat. This would indicate that those leaders will be part of the ash heap from which the NWO phoenix will rise.

After seeing the Economist article, I decided to check into China and came across this Wall Street Journal article…

…”Despite appearances, China’s political system is badly broken, and nobody knows it better than the Communist Party itself. China’s strongman leader, Xi Jinping, is hoping that a crackdown on dissent and corruption will shore up the party’s rule. He is determined to avoid becoming the Mikhail Gorbachev of China, presiding over the party’s collapse. But instead of being the antithesis of Mr. Gorbachev, Mr. Xi may well wind up having the same effect. His despotism is severely stressing China’s system and society—and bringing it closer to a breaking point.”

Interesting.

Upon checking into India, I came across this academia.edu paper from Arshi Saleem Hashmi. Here is a germane passage…


…(from pages 38-39)

It makes sense that the globalists will want to break up the large nations because it fits in to their PR strategy of restoring the appearance of sovereignty (while actually undermining sovereignty by making the divided peoples less able to resist the power of the globalist institutions). Once separated from their central governments, the newly-minted nations will need assistance in getting started, and to whom will they turn for guidance and help? To the United Nations and the multilateral institutions of course! They will turn away from the old power centers of Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and New Delhi and turn towards the new power center, the UN Complex. And this predictable dynamic gives us a clue as to the timeframe during which the breakups will occur.

Common sense suggests that the great nations will be broken up once the multilateral institutions and agreements that will pick up the pieces are finalized. That way, when they break up into their smaller components, those components will be offered continued membership in the multilateral institutions their former central governments set up. And since they’ll need help, they’ll accept that continued membership and thus become dependent on the UN and the regional and functional multilateral institutions (just like the Rockefellers planned back in the 1950’s). Given that the BRICS institutions have been rushed into existence this year, I would expect the breakups to occur sometime between September of this year and 2020, with most of it done by 2018.

I’ll continue to keep an eye on all this.

[Update 66 – 6 August 2015]

Why are the globalists talking about delaying the new SDR currency basket?

A watershed moment in the contrived East versus West dialectic will be the inclusion of China’s renminbi into the IMF’s SDR currency basket. The globalists had planned to do it this October, but an IMF staff report that came out this week calls for a 9-month delay in implementing any changes. From the IMF website…

“IMF Survey: Why is staff proposing an extension of the current SDR basket?

Tiwari: To put this in context, the current SDR basket expires at the end of this year. We are proposing extending the current SDR basket by nine months until September 30, 2016. This is in response to feedback from SDR users on the desirability of avoiding changes in the basket at the end of the calendar year and facilitating continued smooth functioning of SDR-related operations. An extension of nine months would also allow users to adjust to a potential changed basket composition should the Executive Board decide to include the RMB.

The proposed extension, which will be decided by the Executive Board later this month, would not in any way prejudge the timing of conclusion or outcome of the review.”

In addition to this talk of a delay, the staff report questions whether the renminbi is sufficiently “freely usable” to be included in the basket.

So what is their game? Is this merely more propaganda fodder to set up the US versus China showdown later this year, or are the globalists pushing the delay button on their plans and setting up for a dramatic September next year?

I’ll be having a close look at the IMF and press reports to get a feel for what they’re up to.

(P.S. – 10 August 2015) – I ran across this Zero Hedge article this morning: Why Goldman Is Confident The Fed Will Wait To Hike Until December (At Least). It lays out the public propaganda rationale for the Fed delaying its rate increase till December or even next year. If you pair this with the possible postponement of the new IMF SDR basket, it increasingly appears that the globalists may be pushing the delay button on their agenda.

Lately, I’ve also been wondering if Donald Trump has been designated to take the place of Rand Paul as the Establishment’s preferred “anti-establishment” candidate. Rand Paul, like his Mises Mafia compatriot Panos Kammenos in Greece, doesn’t appear to be getting the traction the globalists had hoped for. If Trump starts talking about “sound money,” look out.

On a personal note, I apologize for my dearth of writings over the past few weeks. My grandmother’s visit has turned into a permanent stay, so I will be her caretaker also for the remainder of her stay here on Earth. That makes one son, one grandmother, two dogs, and one former wife I must tend to. My hands are a tad full and my mind a bit scattered right now. Rest assured that I’ll adapt and be fully back on the job at some point in the near future.

Love always…

Reuters is reporting that…

“The U.S. federal government can stay below its legal limit on borrowing until at least late October and likely do so a little longer than that, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said on Wednesday.”

“Late October and a little longer than that” would put the debt limit hit very close to the November 15-16 G20 Summit. Interesting.

So as we cast our gaze upon the US budget / debt limit situation, there are three questions that must be asked…

1) Will the Congress pass a budget for FY 2016 before October 1? Not likely. According to this article about the federal budget from The Fiscal Times, House Speaker John Boehner is already talking about the necessity of passing a continuing resolution to keep the government funded past September 30.

2) Will Congress pass a continuing resolution to avoid a government shutdown? Seeing articles like this makes you wonder…

If it is the globalists’ intention to trigger a US government shutdown prior to the October 9-11 IMF/World Bank Annual Meeting, and I suspect it is, it will be a hot button issue like this that they’ll use for cover. Don’t forget that the Pope will visit the US Congress in late September. What will he have to say about the Planned Parenthood revelations?

3) Will Congress deal with the debt limit before it is hit? I have my doubts. Just imagine how well an October government shutdown (before the IMF meeting) and a November debt limit hit (before the G20 Summit) would set up the UN/IMF/World Bank governance reform agenda.

Much love…

These corrupt politicians are not saviors; they are globalists…

…who, as the Greeks found out, will stab you in the back once you embrace them.

A most interesting report popped up in the Greek media this week: Greek PM Tsipras Allegedly Asked Russia for $10 Bln to Print Drachmas. Here is a key excerpt…

>>> The July 5 referendum was a test for Tsipras to see what the Greek people were thinking about Europe and the Eurozone. However, on the night of the referendum, word came from Russia that Putin did not want to support Greece’s return to the drachma. That was confirmed the days that followed. After that, Tsipras had no choice left but to “surrender” to German Chancellor Angela Merkel and sign the third bailout package. <<<

In the days since the report surfaced, both RT and Sputnik have come out with Russian denials. So who is telling the truth, the Greek newspaper or the Russian news services? To answer this question, let’s go back to Waterloo Day, June 18th.

If you recall, two separate meetings convened on that day: the Eurozone was meeting to supposedly decide Greece’s fate, and the BRICS were meeting at the St. Petersburg Forum. And which meeting did Tsipras and his delegation of government ministers attend? The St. Petersburg meeting. Here is a June 19 WorldOil.com report of what one of Greece’s Ministers did there…

>>> Russia signed a preliminary agreement on building a natural-gas pipeline through Greece, a deal that signals strengthening ties between the countries as the crisis-stricken government in Athens is increasingly isolated from the rest of Europe.

Russia’s development bank, known as VEB, will own 50% of the 2 billion-euro link and provide all financing, Greek Energy Minister Panagiotis Lafazanis told reporters after the signing in St. Petersburg, Russia, on Friday. Greece will own the rest, Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak said. <<<

And on the day that Minister Lafazanis was attending that signing, can you guess what else he told the press? According to Sputnik…

“On June 19, Greek Energy Minister Panagiotis Lafazanis told Sputnik that Greece could become the first non-founder members of the NDB, joining on an equal footing as its current members, as soon as the bank was launched.

The NDB is expected to begin operations on July 7, according to Russian Deputy Finance Minister Sergei Storchak.”

And let’s not forget that Greek Prime Minister Tsipras met with the President of the BRICS Bank during the Forum as well. From the Greek Reporter…

“Tsipras also met with representatives of the new development bank for BRICS countries, who expressed their intense interest in cooperating with Greece.”

So as of June 19, the Greeks had signed with the Russians and were expecting to be welcomed into the BRICS Bank as soon as it began operations in early July. When the time came, though, Putin balked. Why? What happened – or didn’t happen – that made Putin reverse direction in the time between June 19 and the BRICS Summit on July 8-9?

(continued)

In order to correctly answer these questions, we must first remind ourselves of a key facet of the New World Order transition strategy: the planned rise of the Mises Mafia.

Once the globalists trigger the final collapse of the Interim World Order (the Bretton Woods arrangement), people will be angry, current political leaders will take the blame, and new leadership will be needed. It goes without saying that the globalists did not leave the public’s search for new leaders to chance; they have been pre-marketing a cadre of controlled opposition leaders who will ride the wave of public outrage into office (and then implement the NWO’s policies). This cadre includes Ron and Rand Paul in the US, Marine Le Pen in France, and Nigel Farage in the UK.

In Greece, though, it is this man…

…Panos Kammenos, leader of “the Greek UKIP.” – (from Breitbart)

The globalists arranged for the odd pairing of Tsipras’ “left wing” Syriza Party and Kammenos’ “right wing” Independent Greeks Party in order to place Kammenos into the post of Greek Defense Minister. As the civilian leader of the Greek military, he would be in a key position should any civil disorder occur as the West puts the screws to the Greek people.

This being said, the Russians DO want the Greeks to switch over to the BRICS, but they don’t want Tsipras to be the one who does it; they want Kammenos to bring the Greeks in. If they had let Tsipras lead the switchover, he and Syriza would have been the heroes and the way forward for Kammenos would be blocked. Being part of the Occulted Powers who are pulling the strings on this whole East vs. West puppet show, the Eastern Orthodox Church wants an award-winning Orthodox Christian (Kammenos) to be the hero, not a godless communist (Tsipras). Tsipras and Syriza’s role is to take the fall.

With Panos Kammenos’ central role in mind, we can now ask ourselves why Putin stiffed the Greeks earlier this month. And in pondering the answer, two plausible scenarios come to mind…

1) The globalists’ failure to pull the trigger on Greece’s banks on June 22 meant there was no civil disorder and no opportunity for Kammenos to step in and play the hero before the BRICS Summit occurred. Therefore, Putin had no choice but to backtrack on a Greek rescue until another opportunity presents itself.

2) The whole process of inviting Syriza into the BRICS Bank was a setup. Once the Greeks were fully committed (the day of the referendum), Putin withdrew his offer and left Syriza to twist in the wind. Now the globalists will apply pressure to the Greeks until they snap, and Syriza will fall so Kammenos can step up.

I’ll be adding more supporting information to this entry over the next few days.

For the previous update from this series, click here.

Love always…