Guess who will be leading the US when Putin launches the NWO…
In this entry, I’ll continue with what I started in Democratic National Convention Watch: Update 1 – Who was behind “Leaky July”, so here goes:
This is something I wrote early last year in Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags…
>>> Once the globalists trigger the New Lehman Event and take down the West, the Western populations will be furious at their leaders. The globalists know this. This is why they’ve been preparing to scapegoat the existing political figures and replace them with pre-marketed “outsiders” who will “set things right again.” <<<
Q – So in the United States, who are the “existing political figures” – which figures represent the “Establishment” in people’s minds?
A – The Clintons (on the Democrat side) and the Bushes (on the Republican side).
Q – Which American political figures were hung out to dry during Leaky July?
A – The Clintons (with the commencement of the Hillary Leaks series) and the Bushes (with the release of the 28 Pages).
Q – In the United States, who is the “outsider who will set things right again”?
A – Donald Trump, who is publicly shunned by the Bushes (the Republican Establishment) and publicly opposed by the Clintons (the Democratic Establishment).
Q – So in the coming US Presidential election, who is the “Establishment candidate” and who is the “Anti-Establishment candidate”?
A – Hillary Clinton represents the entrenched Establishment insider and Donald Trump represents the Anti-Establishment “outsider” who will “set things right again.”
Q – On the global stage, which national leader is most widely perceived to be an Anti-Establishment figure like Trump?
A – Vladimir Putin, who is widely portrayed as a threat to the established world order (which is supposedly controlled by the “US Empire” and its EU “vassals”)…
…From the Australian Strategic Policy Institute
Q – What alternative to the established world order does Vladimir Putin offer?
A – A New World Order…
…From The Moscow Times
And Putin’s New World Order is based on a “transformed” United Nations…
…From Kremlin.ru. This graphic shows an excerpt from Putin’s speech to the UN General Assembly during their big 70th session last September. Let’s take special note of some of the ideas it contains…
> In the boxed remarks on top, he is referring to the United States of course. He makes reference to the globalist catchword “American exceptionalism.”
> When he says “…the UN should also undergo natural transformation. Russia is ready to work together with its partners to develop the UN further on the basis of a broad consensus,” he is referring to the globalist plan to rejuvenate the UN brand so people will more readily accept its new leading role. To learn more about this effort to rebrand the UN, read…
Don’t be fooled by globalist rebranding, which contains this…
>>> The replacement of tainted existing brands by fresh new brands extends beyond globalist organizations of course; it includes political figures as well. Many of the leaders people associate with the current crises (the scapegoats) will be swept aside by “heroic” controlled opposition figures who “saw it all coming” and could have prevented it “if only we’d had the power.”
As I’ve shown in previous entries, the globalists seem to be positioning the “right wing dissenters” to take the political stage after the transition. This is symbolically appropriate given the whole Left Hand/Right Hand approach of the “elite.” They use the Left Hand to cause chaos and destruction and the Right Hand to bring about order and construction. It is for this reason that they’ve carefully built-up a public image of foresighted/conscientious dissent for “right wing” figures like Marine Le Pen, Nigel Farage, Ron Paul, Rand Paul, and Ted Cruz. They have also done this for “left-winger” Elizabeth Warren, so she must have some role to play in bringing the “political left” into the fold after the transition. <<<
…and also read…
The BRICS and the UN governance reform scam, which contains this…
>>> Observing these three facts, it is abundantly clear that the BRICS alliance was fashioned by the Western globalists. The West brought the BRICS into the global economic governance system back in 1999, the West gave them a name and introduced the idea of them becoming a bloc back in 2001, and the BRIC nations accommodated the West by forming the bloc in 2006, just before the 2007-2009 economic crisis hit. They then held their first BRIC Summit right after the effects of the Lehman Shock eased in 2009, which was the same year that the BRIC-inclusive G20 formally supplanted the G7 as the world’s “permanent council for international economic cooperation.”
Since the G20 nations are all run by politicians owned by the same International Banking Cabal, getting them to form the NWO is something that could be done at any time. It takes more than simply getting the “leaders” to vote for it, though; the general population of these nations must follow their leaders into the new system, and this is what the BRICS alliance is all about. It is an exercise in public relations.
As I mentioned in a previous entry, the BRICS alliance “gives form to the dialectic clash between Anglo-American bankers and BRICS bankers which will birth the NWO.” The BRICS concept gives the people of the traditionally oppressed nations the illusion that they have formed a mighty alliance which will take over the global governance system from the imperialist West, and the perception that they have triumphed and taken over is supposed to lead to their enthusiastic embrace of the NWO system. But alas, it is all a scam. <<<
Getting back to the ideas in Putin’s UN speech…
> When he talks about “truly independent states,” he is referring to the phony return to “national sovereignty” that is part of the NWO narrative. The globalist vision for the NWO is to have a world of smaller, seemingly independent nations that must cooperate in order to maintain their security and a modern standard of living. And that international cooperation is to take place through multilateral institutions that the globalists control, with the globalist-created, BRICS-rebranded UN being the centerpiece of it all.
So with all this set before us, what roles do Hillary, Trump and Putin play in the globalists’ NWO plan?
Hillary represents the established world order that will be defeated in favor of the BRICS New World Order. Putin will be the de facto or de jure leader of the New Order (possibly as Secretary-General of the UN). And Trump will cooperate with the New Order due to the fact that it will appear to be a return to national sovereignty. And since newly elected Western leaders must be seen as “Anti-Establishment” and amenable to cooperation with Putin, Hillary is scripted to lose this election. The globalists will not allow the presence of the sullied old Western leaders to stain the reputation of Putin and his NWO.
Much love…
P.S. – For the record, Rand Paul appeared to the Anti-Establishment nominee back when I wrote “Throwing the Game: Why the globalists are exposing their own false-flags.” But his failure to energize the electorate led to his replacement by someone who was more loud, more stupid, and more showy, Donald Trump.
(P.S. – 30 July 2016) – I just updated one of my articles on Putin’s family background. Here is a section that was expanded (with the new information on the bottom)…
BEGIN EXCERPT>>>
While we’re on the subject of crowns, have a look at what this 2002 article from Pravda says about The Mysterious Genealogy of Russian President Putin…
“…Is Putin an offspring of the Tver prince? This hypothesis was getting more and more real. The name Putin is not mentioned amid the Russian names. This means that the name is of the artificial origin.
This name has appeared recently, somewhere in the middle of the 19th century. All Putins originally came from the clan of Putins from the Tver region. Illegitimate offsprings of noble families were often given cut names. For example, Russian writer Pnin was an illegitimate son of Field Marshal Repnin. There were lots of other occasions like that – Betskoy instead of Trubetskoy, Gribov instead of Griboyedov. The new names of unofficial clan branches were formed by means of deduction: a syllable was simply taken out of it.
The family book of the Tver region mentions the name of Putyanin – a clan of Russian princes. This clan gave a lot of outstanding military leaders to Russia, as well as artists, politicians and priests. This is one of the oldest clans in the Russian history. If President Putin is a descendant of the Putyatins clan, this means that Vladimir Putin has a relation to all royal families of Europe.”
Since the US Presidents have been shown to be related to European royals, the article’s hypothesis wouldn’t surprise me if true. And if we take a closer look at the Putyatin clan referenced in the article, we find a reference to the Rasputin connection…
…From Wikipedia
With these puzzle pieces set before us, what insights can we draw from them? Given this and previous information I’ve encountered, these are my provisional conclusions…
<<<END EXCERPT
The article from which this excerpt is taken, Vladimir (Ras)Putin’s Jewish, Communist, and Bloodline Connections, is expanded upon in Israel’s Chief Sephardic Rabbi has confirmed that Putin is a Jew.
(P.S. – 30 July 2016) – Is ISIS’ supporter Erdogan attempting to trigger World War 3 by laying siege to Incirlik Air Base and its nukes?…
…From RT. More on this in the morning…
By the way, the German city of Cologne will wake up to a nasty reality tomorrow: a large rally by pro-Erdogan Islamists…
…From Breitbart
(P.S. – 31 July 2016) – Bloomberg reports…
“Turkish authorities restored access to and from a key air base used in operations against Islamic State militants, local media reported on Sunday, one day before the U.S. top military official is scheduled to visit the country.”
So in this short siege, Erdogan was publicly seen holding a knife to the throat of Incirlik and its supposed nukes on the night before the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff visits. This could be the propaganda setup for a “real” seizure of the nukes in the coming weeks. I’ll go deeper into this “Turkey Scenario” in my next entry.