Let’s take a second look at a section from Update 19…

BEGIN EXCERPT>>>

…I take you back to the 1961 NWO blueprint book Prospect for America. This is from page 26…

The globalists want the NWO to consist of “smaller units” because smaller nations are less likely to be self-sufficient in maintaining their security and a modern standard of living. They want all the nations to be dependent on the multilateral framework for their security and economic wellbeing.

Besides the Rockefellers’ NWO architects, can you guess who else is talking about “smaller units”? Ron Paul (in this interview on RT)…

“I happen to believe in smaller units of government; the larger the unit of government, the worse things are…

So I think people should have the right to leave a larger unit of government.”

And what else is Ron Paul talking about? Secession in the US…

…Note that he gave this speech at a Mises Institute conference called Breaking Away: The Case for Secession…

[Starting from the 1:20 mark] – “I would like to start off by talking about the subject, and the subject, of course, is secession and nullification — the breaking up of government. And the good news is it’s gonna happen. It’s happening. And it’s not gonna be because there will be enough people in the US Congress to legislate it — it won’t happen. It will be de facto.”

So we know the globalists are aiming to break up the EU (which is the Interim World Order in Europe), and Greece is where that will begin. But will they also break up the USA so it can never rise again as the power it once was? Will Russia and China meet the same fate at some point?

<<<END EXCERPT

With that last question in mind, have a look at an Economist article I ran across today…

…”UNDER Vladimir Putin’s presidency, Russia is seen in the outside world as an expansionist power trying to revise post-Soviet borders and rebuild an empire. But what if Russia itself—a country of nearly 200 nationalities that stretches across 11 time zones—is in danger of crumbling?”

It is quite interesting to see this coming out of the Economist. If we look back to the their infamous cover from early this year, we see Putin (and other major leaders including America’s Obama, China’s Xi, and India’s Modi) presented in the color of ash….

…which is the color of the phoenix eggs on the woman’s hat. This would indicate that those leaders will be part of the ash heap from which the NWO phoenix will rise.

After seeing the Economist article, I decided to check into China and came across this Wall Street Journal article…

…”Despite appearances, China’s political system is badly broken, and nobody knows it better than the Communist Party itself. China’s strongman leader, Xi Jinping, is hoping that a crackdown on dissent and corruption will shore up the party’s rule. He is determined to avoid becoming the Mikhail Gorbachev of China, presiding over the party’s collapse. But instead of being the antithesis of Mr. Gorbachev, Mr. Xi may well wind up having the same effect. His despotism is severely stressing China’s system and society—and bringing it closer to a breaking point.”

Interesting.

Upon checking into India, I came across this academia.edu paper from Arshi Saleem Hashmi. Here is a germane passage…


…(from pages 38-39)

It makes sense that the globalists will want to break up the large nations because it fits in to their PR strategy of restoring the appearance of sovereignty (while actually undermining sovereignty by making the divided peoples less able to resist the power of the globalist institutions). Once separated from their central governments, the newly-minted nations will need assistance in getting started, and to whom will they turn for guidance and help? To the United Nations and the multilateral institutions of course! They will turn away from the old power centers of Washington, Moscow, Beijing, and New Delhi and turn towards the new power center, the UN Complex. And this predictable dynamic gives us a clue as to the timeframe during which the breakups will occur.

Common sense suggests that the great nations will be broken up once the multilateral institutions and agreements that will pick up the pieces are finalized. That way, when they break up into their smaller components, those components will be offered continued membership in the multilateral institutions their former central governments set up. And since they’ll need help, they’ll accept that continued membership and thus become dependent on the UN and the regional and functional multilateral institutions (just like the Rockefellers planned back in the 1950’s). Given that the BRICS institutions have been rushed into existence this year, I would expect the breakups to occur sometime between September of this year and 2020, with most of it done by 2018.

I’ll continue to keep an eye on all this.

[Update 66 – 6 August 2015]

Why are the globalists talking about delaying the new SDR currency basket?

A watershed moment in the contrived East versus West dialectic will be the inclusion of China’s renminbi into the IMF’s SDR currency basket. The globalists had planned to do it this October, but an IMF staff report that came out this week calls for a 9-month delay in implementing any changes. From the IMF website…

“IMF Survey: Why is staff proposing an extension of the current SDR basket?

Tiwari: To put this in context, the current SDR basket expires at the end of this year. We are proposing extending the current SDR basket by nine months until September 30, 2016. This is in response to feedback from SDR users on the desirability of avoiding changes in the basket at the end of the calendar year and facilitating continued smooth functioning of SDR-related operations. An extension of nine months would also allow users to adjust to a potential changed basket composition should the Executive Board decide to include the RMB.

The proposed extension, which will be decided by the Executive Board later this month, would not in any way prejudge the timing of conclusion or outcome of the review.”

In addition to this talk of a delay, the staff report questions whether the renminbi is sufficiently “freely usable” to be included in the basket.

So what is their game? Is this merely more propaganda fodder to set up the US versus China showdown later this year, or are the globalists pushing the delay button on their plans and setting up for a dramatic September next year?

I’ll be having a close look at the IMF and press reports to get a feel for what they’re up to.

(P.S. – 10 August 2015) – I ran across this Zero Hedge article this morning: Why Goldman Is Confident The Fed Will Wait To Hike Until December (At Least). It lays out the public propaganda rationale for the Fed delaying its rate increase till December or even next year. If you pair this with the possible postponement of the new IMF SDR basket, it increasingly appears that the globalists may be pushing the delay button on their agenda.

Lately, I’ve also been wondering if Donald Trump has been designated to take the place of Rand Paul as the Establishment’s preferred “anti-establishment” candidate. Rand Paul, like his Mises Mafia compatriot Panos Kammenos in Greece, doesn’t appear to be getting the traction the globalists had hoped for. If Trump starts talking about “sound money,” look out.

On a personal note, I apologize for my dearth of writings over the past few weeks. My grandmother’s visit has turned into a permanent stay, so I will be her caretaker also for the remainder of her stay here on Earth. That makes one son, one grandmother, two dogs, and one former wife I must tend to. My hands are a tad full and my mind a bit scattered right now. Rest assured that I’ll adapt and be fully back on the job at some point in the near future.

Love always…

Reuters is reporting that…

“The U.S. federal government can stay below its legal limit on borrowing until at least late October and likely do so a little longer than that, Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said on Wednesday.”

“Late October and a little longer than that” would put the debt limit hit very close to the November 15-16 G20 Summit. Interesting.

So as we cast our gaze upon the US budget / debt limit situation, there are three questions that must be asked…

1) Will the Congress pass a budget for FY 2016 before October 1? Not likely. According to this article about the federal budget from The Fiscal Times, House Speaker John Boehner is already talking about the necessity of passing a continuing resolution to keep the government funded past September 30.

2) Will Congress pass a continuing resolution to avoid a government shutdown? Seeing articles like this makes you wonder…

If it is the globalists’ intention to trigger a US government shutdown prior to the October 9-11 IMF/World Bank Annual Meeting, and I suspect it is, it will be a hot button issue like this that they’ll use for cover. Don’t forget that the Pope will visit the US Congress in late September. What will he have to say about the Planned Parenthood revelations?

3) Will Congress deal with the debt limit before it is hit? I have my doubts. Just imagine how well an October government shutdown (before the IMF meeting) and a November debt limit hit (before the G20 Summit) would set up the UN/IMF/World Bank governance reform agenda.

Much love…

These corrupt politicians are not saviors; they are globalists…

…who, as the Greeks found out, will stab you in the back once you embrace them.

A most interesting report popped up in the Greek media this week: Greek PM Tsipras Allegedly Asked Russia for $10 Bln to Print Drachmas. Here is a key excerpt…

>>> The July 5 referendum was a test for Tsipras to see what the Greek people were thinking about Europe and the Eurozone. However, on the night of the referendum, word came from Russia that Putin did not want to support Greece’s return to the drachma. That was confirmed the days that followed. After that, Tsipras had no choice left but to “surrender” to German Chancellor Angela Merkel and sign the third bailout package. <<<

In the days since the report surfaced, both RT and Sputnik have come out with Russian denials. So who is telling the truth, the Greek newspaper or the Russian news services? To answer this question, let’s go back to Waterloo Day, June 18th.

If you recall, two separate meetings convened on that day: the Eurozone was meeting to supposedly decide Greece’s fate, and the BRICS were meeting at the St. Petersburg Forum. And which meeting did Tsipras and his delegation of government ministers attend? The St. Petersburg meeting. Here is a June 19 WorldOil.com report of what one of Greece’s Ministers did there…

>>> Russia signed a preliminary agreement on building a natural-gas pipeline through Greece, a deal that signals strengthening ties between the countries as the crisis-stricken government in Athens is increasingly isolated from the rest of Europe.

Russia’s development bank, known as VEB, will own 50% of the 2 billion-euro link and provide all financing, Greek Energy Minister Panagiotis Lafazanis told reporters after the signing in St. Petersburg, Russia, on Friday. Greece will own the rest, Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak said. <<<

And on the day that Minister Lafazanis was attending that signing, can you guess what else he told the press? According to Sputnik…

“On June 19, Greek Energy Minister Panagiotis Lafazanis told Sputnik that Greece could become the first non-founder members of the NDB, joining on an equal footing as its current members, as soon as the bank was launched.

The NDB is expected to begin operations on July 7, according to Russian Deputy Finance Minister Sergei Storchak.”

And let’s not forget that Greek Prime Minister Tsipras met with the President of the BRICS Bank during the Forum as well. From the Greek Reporter…

“Tsipras also met with representatives of the new development bank for BRICS countries, who expressed their intense interest in cooperating with Greece.”

So as of June 19, the Greeks had signed with the Russians and were expecting to be welcomed into the BRICS Bank as soon as it began operations in early July. When the time came, though, Putin balked. Why? What happened – or didn’t happen – that made Putin reverse direction in the time between June 19 and the BRICS Summit on July 8-9?

(continued)

In order to correctly answer these questions, we must first remind ourselves of a key facet of the New World Order transition strategy: the planned rise of the Mises Mafia.

Once the globalists trigger the final collapse of the Interim World Order (the Bretton Woods arrangement), people will be angry, current political leaders will take the blame, and new leadership will be needed. It goes without saying that the globalists did not leave the public’s search for new leaders to chance; they have been pre-marketing a cadre of controlled opposition leaders who will ride the wave of public outrage into office (and then implement the NWO’s policies). This cadre includes Ron and Rand Paul in the US, Marine Le Pen in France, and Nigel Farage in the UK.

In Greece, though, it is this man…

…Panos Kammenos, leader of “the Greek UKIP.” – (from Breitbart)

The globalists arranged for the odd pairing of Tsipras’ “left wing” Syriza Party and Kammenos’ “right wing” Independent Greeks Party in order to place Kammenos into the post of Greek Defense Minister. As the civilian leader of the Greek military, he would be in a key position should any civil disorder occur as the West puts the screws to the Greek people.

This being said, the Russians DO want the Greeks to switch over to the BRICS, but they don’t want Tsipras to be the one who does it; they want Kammenos to bring the Greeks in. If they had let Tsipras lead the switchover, he and Syriza would have been the heroes and the way forward for Kammenos would be blocked. Being part of the Occulted Powers who are pulling the strings on this whole East vs. West puppet show, the Eastern Orthodox Church wants an award-winning Orthodox Christian (Kammenos) to be the hero, not a godless communist (Tsipras). Tsipras and Syriza’s role is to take the fall.

With Panos Kammenos’ central role in mind, we can now ask ourselves why Putin stiffed the Greeks earlier this month. And in pondering the answer, two plausible scenarios come to mind…

1) The globalists’ failure to pull the trigger on Greece’s banks on June 22 meant there was no civil disorder and no opportunity for Kammenos to step in and play the hero before the BRICS Summit occurred. Therefore, Putin had no choice but to backtrack on a Greek rescue until another opportunity presents itself.

2) The whole process of inviting Syriza into the BRICS Bank was a setup. Once the Greeks were fully committed (the day of the referendum), Putin withdrew his offer and left Syriza to twist in the wind. Now the globalists will apply pressure to the Greeks until they snap, and Syriza will fall so Kammenos can step up.

I’ll be adding more supporting information to this entry over the next few days.

For the previous update from this series, click here.

Love always…

[Update 60]

Does this remind you of someone you saw in the news recently?…

…Our dear little Wolfy, perhaps?

The Eurozone really laid it on thick over the weekend. They made a big show of having the Germans humiliate and subjugate the Greeks. This is great propaganda fodder for showing the world the evils of the Western Establishment and the need to defeat the “Zionists / Neocons / Nazis.” And they did everything they could to make the deal as unpalatable as possible for the Greek Parliament and the Greek people.

Now we wait to see how the disorder starts. Will the Greek government seize up? Will the people gather around the Parliament building and command a “no” to the deal? And what happens to the proud Germans when the globalists take down their twin towers with derivative charges in the next few months?…

…(source: Wikipedia)

On another note, should disorder occur and Defense Minister Kammenos step up, he now has plausible deniability. He can say that he held his nose and voted for the deal on Saturday in order to prevent civil disorder. That way, it doesn’t look like he was waiting like a vulture to capitalize on the chaos and lead Greece to the BRICS.

[Update 61 – 13 July 2015]

Don’t overlook the possibility of a July Fed rate hike

After coming across press accounts like this and this, my spidey sense is tingling sufficiently to add the July FOMC meeting to the NWO Schedule of Implementation page. Here is the addendum…

> July 28-29: The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will meet. Although relatively few are expecting an interest rate increase at this meeting, there is one “coincidence” that points to the possibility of one: the BRICS Bank’s $100 billion Contingency Reserve Fund will be in place by the end of July…

…(from The BRICS Post)

If you couple the Fund’s early readiness with the fact that one of its purposes is to “provide assistance to other countries suffering from the economic volatility in the wake of the United States’ exit from its expansionary monetary policy,” it suggests that an end of July rate hike isn’t out of the question. Why have it ready by the end of July if it won’t be needed till September?

In light of this, also consider this Press TV report from last November’s G20 meeting: China urges BRICS to open development bank soon…

>>> Speaking on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Australia on Saturday, China’s Vice Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao said, “All (countries) share the view that they should speed up the process to have it completed as quickly as possible.”

Zhu said that the BRICS group – which includes Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa – should ensure that the bank will provide services as soon as it is launched. [It was launched on 7/7/2015]

“And each country will identify feasible projects for the bank as quickly as possible, so that at the moment the bank is launched it will be able to immediately carry out (financing) processes,” the Chinese official said. <<<

Should the globalists wait till September for the rate hike, the world will be in economic shock when the Pope kicks off the September UN Summit. But if they hike this month, the world will be on its knees by then. So how do they want us, in shock or on our knees? We’ll know on July 29.

[Update 62 – 14 July 2015]

Will Zoi Konstantopoulou stop Tsipras?

Thanks to the cooperation of oppositions parties, Tsipras will likely have more than enough votes to pass the Greek Surrender Acts. But there is one last-ditch defender who might be able to stand in his way, Zoi Konstantopoulou. If you recall, she was the one who came out last month to announce the findings of the Greek Debt Truth Committee, calling the debt “illegal, illegitimate, and odious.” As the linked BBC article states…

“The concept of odious debt is established in international law where dictatorships or illegitimate governments have borrowed money and later been succeeded by democratic regimes.”

A better explanation of “odious debt” is found in this article at Henry Makow’s site. A key figure in the piece is a man named Costas Lapavitsas. We first looked at him in Update 19, and as was noted then, he has ties to the London Establishment (he got his masters at the notorious London School of Economics and was given a professorship at the University of London).

So why is a guy with ties to London criticizing the Western financial system and advocating the renunciation of odious debt? Because this is all part of the scam the banksters are running. In a debt-based currency system, debt inevitably builds to unsupportable levels and must be periodically written-down. By using the odious debt approach, they are making this writedown look like it’s part of a “freedom movement.” And they are using this phony freedom movement to bring in their NWO system.

As we move toward Wednesday’s deadline for the Greek Parliament to pass Eurozone-demanded “reforms,” a scenario involving Konstantopoulou seems the only way the Greeks can rebel before the vote occurs. The Greek Reporter notes…

“The Greek prime minister has to persuade his major opponent, House Speaker Zoi Konstantopoulou, to introduce the bills in parliament.”

With strikes and demonstrations to support the “oxi” stance planned for tomorrow, will Konstantopoulou set procedural obstacles to the passage of the bills? Will other members of parliament let her keep her position as a backdoor way of voting against the bills? The situation doesn’t look promising, but let’s hope the script calls for her to step up. That way, this thing doesn’t keep dragging on for weeks and weeks.

For the previous updates from this series, click here.

Much love…