Monthly Archives: September 2014

The New “Multipolar” World and the “Golden Age” – They’re not what you think they are

My recent article on the farcical East/West conflict was kindly posted by Jean Haines on her blog, and she asked her readers for their opinions on it. Having looked at the various comments, I realize I’ll have to write several entries to adequately answer them, so I will. 🙂 But to start off, I thought I’d address the two ideas that most grabbed my attention:

1) That “a multi-polar world is going to be a far different picture” than what I’m forecasting.

2) That “we’re heading into the Golden Age.”

So to begin with the first point…

The multipolar / multilateral New World Order is the NWO the Globalist Banking Cabal have been planning all along.

But you don’t have to take my word for it. Take theirs:

Here is an article straight from the IMF website
IMFmulti
…So a global crisis that the globalist banksters engineered requires supranational solutions? Quelle surprise! Note that the globalist buzzwords, multipolar and multilateral, are also prominently featured.

And here is an excerpt from the foreword of a World Bank report titled Global Development Horizons 2011 – Multipolarity: The New Global Economy
WBmulti
…What, multipolar shows up again? How can this be? 🙂

And here is a small portion of the results you get when you search for the word “multipolar” on the BIS website
BISmulti
…This is just part of the first page of results, and there are three other pages of such articles and speeches. Take your pick.

If you comb through the archives of these bankster-run organizations, you will find no plans related to an Anglo-American, “Nazionist” NWO. You will find plans only for the globalized, multipolar NWO that is currently being birthed. They have been actively implementing these plans since the IMF created the SDR back in 1969. There never was going to be an evil Anglo-American New World Order because the globalists are globalists. They want a world empire, and the only way to persuade people to live in such an empire is if you convince them that all nations within it are on equal footing. The multipolar/multilateral model does that.

The evil Nazi/Zionist NWO was never anything more than a public relations golem they conjured up for the dialectic manipulation of the population. As I wrote in an old entry titled David Wilcock and the Real NWO

“It is really very simple: the Illuminati built a rabbit trap (in the BRICS alliance) that looks like a nice, safe hole to hide from danger. Now they are beating the bushes (with the Western powers) to drive the rabbits toward the trap.”

(If you haven’t read the full article, I recommend you do. This Internet Archive copy still has the pictures I included.)

In another old entry, I laid out what I expect them to do once they determine it’s time to implement the switchover…

“So this is how it will go down (if they are able to pull it off)…

> They will collapse the old system.

> They will launch the new system by handing out lots of money so people will gleefully accept it. (At this initial stage, they’ll probably block financial access to very few people, such as those trying to buy weapons.)

> Once everyone is dependent on the new system, they will start blocking money from more and more people for more and more reasons until all who remain are locked into a very small box of “elite”-approved behavior.

How will they lock out dissidents, you ask? By using RFID readers at cash registers, intersections, roadblocks, cell towers, etc., as well as in smart meters, cell phones, wireless portals, etc., they will track the movement and destination of all currency and goods. And if you are designated a persona non grata, your digital and physical cash, as well as your consumer products, will be seized for whatever reason they choose to invent. You will be unable to buy, sell, or barter in the mainstream economy.

Make no mistake: the new financial system being sold to the undiscerning elements of the awake and aware community is not of the True Light. It is just the new, improved version of Cabal control covered with a candy coating.

So what should one do? When the old system collapses, I sense the need to GO LOCAL, because any global system being offered will be a trap. Back in the early days of the American colonies, they produced their own scrip (cash), and they did just fine. Going back to community self-sufficiency seems the key to freedom. If the System comes after those who do so, we’ll have to cross that bridge when we get there (with God’s help). Resistance might look futile, but it is a requirement.”

All this being said, let’s move on to the second point…

A Golden Age for whom?

There has been a lot of talk in New Age circles about humanity entering a new Golden Age, but very few people have bothered to look into what a “Golden Age” really means to the occultists who established and promoted the New Age mind control system. If you look into the historical accounts of the Dragon Family (also known as the Illuminati, the Order, etc.), you find some surprising information.

Here is an excerpt from a pro-Dragon website that collects and posts Dragon lore…

>>> Their race was known by various names. In Assyria, the Annodoti. In Sumeria, the Annunaki. In Druidic lore, the Tuatha de Danaan. In Judeo-Christian scriptures, they are called the Nephilim, “the Sons of God”, or the Watchers. They are described as having attachments such as wings, horns, and even fish scales, but from the depictions it is clear that these are costumes worn for their symbolic value, for these symbols indicated divine power and royal blood. The gods themselves had their own monarchy, with laws of succession similar to our own, and they built a global empire upon the Earth, with great cities, temples, monuments, and mighty nations established on several continents. Man was separate from the gods, like a domesticated animal, and there was a great cultural taboo amongst the gods against sharing any of their sacred information with humanity, even things such as writing and mathematics. These gods ruled directly over Egypt, Mesopotamia, and the Indus Valley, and their rule is recorded in the histories of all three civilizations.

This global monarchy was the crowning glory of the ages, and the period of their rule came to be called “the Golden Age”, or as the Egyptians called it, “the First Time”, when the gods watched over man directly, like a shepherd does his flock. In fact, they were often called “the Shepherd Kings.” One of the symbols of this world monarchy was an eye hovering over a throne, and this eye now adorns our American dollar bill, presented as the missing capstone of the Great Pyramid of Giza, underneath which are written the words “New World Order.” Clearly this New World Order is the global monarchy that or Founding Fathers (not a Democrat among them) intended for this nation to participate in all along, symbolized by a pyramid as a representation of the ideal and perfectly ordered authoritarian empire. <<<

Here is a passage from another pro-Dragon site, and it is attributed to Michael Baigent, a notable Freemason writer…

“Furthermore, the world empire of the Atlantean kings who spawned the Merovingians is more complete now than it has ever been since the gods left the earth during the Deluge. The United Nations, a feeble example, will surely give way at some point to a united world government strong enough and glorious enough to be called an empire. The fallen kingdom of the gods is clearly returning, and the new Golden Age is upon us. If this author’s hunch is correct, this is, indeed, a glorious time to be alive.”

Speaking of the Merovingians, one of their symbols, the fleur-de-lis, is prominently featured on the second Dragon webpage. And in this particular section, it is shown along with the Anunnaki flying disc symbol and the “goddess” Isis
dragonmero
Can you think of another place you’ve seen the fleur-de-lis recently?
ecocover2

Make no mistake, the Anunnaki (if they actually exist), the Dragons/Illuminati, the Kabbalist Jews, the Freemasons, etc. are attempting to bring us into a multipolar New World Order and a new “Golden Age.” And through their New Age paradigm and dialectic tactics, they are attempting to program you to believe these are good things. I’d be careful about drinking that Kool Aid.

In closing, I’d like to say that my intention in writing about these things is to give people a chance, not to scare them. For if we follow the siren song of the BRICS propaganda, we will walk right into the trap the globalists have set for us. Since I can’t sit idly by and allow that to happen, I point out facts and offer the most rational and intuitive interpretation I can in order to give people a conscious choice. Will you hide in your comfort zone and let them erect their new slavery system around you, or will you work with your neighbors to self-govern and to stop using their debt money? The choice is now yours.

Offered with love, with more to come…

The IMF and the Mainstream Media are following the “Blame the Fed” Script

Get ready to blame the Jewish woman…
yellen

and her Israeli Deputy
fischer

It didn’t take long for my take on things to get some validation. The day after I released the Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce article, I saw this on Drudge…
drudgyell
…It shows the scapegoat, Janet Yellen, along with two articles. The first article talks about the markets booming because she kept interest rates low, and the second offers a warning from the “wise” IMF that excessive risk-taking is happening because of the low interest rates. It is no coincidence that the IMF story hit the media on the same day Yellen announced she would leave the interest rate outlook unchanged.

Here are some telling quotes from the first article, Dow Closes at a Record as Fed Reassures on Rates, with my comments added in brackets…

>>> The five-year bull market in U.S. stocks got a new lease on life, as investors embrace the steady-as-she-goes message the Federal Reserve is delivering on the economy and interest rates.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose to a record and the dollar jumped to a six-year high against the yen, after the Fed took tentative steps toward unwinding its historic easy-money policies while reassuring investors that rates will remain low even as the economy expands…

Wednesday’s action underscores the investor belief that the Fed will raise interest rates next year, while the European Central Bank and Bank of Japan will continue pushing rates down in a bid to spur struggling economies.

“In the big picture, the Fed is decreasing its balance sheet and looking to tighten policy, while the ECB and Bank of Japan are on the opposite path,” said Kiran Ganesh, a strategist at UBS Wealth Management

[The last two passages set a contrast between what Yellen is doing and what the central bankers of the other developed economies are doing. She is zigging while the others are zagging.]

Investors said the Fed meeting reinforced demand for the U.S. dollar and riskier investments such as stocks…

Fed policy has been credited with fueling the five-year-long bull market in stocks….

[In these two passages, Fed policy is established as the cause for the market’s appetite for “riskier investments.” So who will be blamed when those risky investments blow up?]
<<<

In the second article, IMF warns of risks from ‘excessive’ financial market bets, the IMF is established as the voice of reason, speaking truth to the risk-taking madness…

>>> The global economy faces a growing risk from big financial market bets that could quickly unravel if investors get spooked by geopolitical tensions or a shift in U.S. interest rate policy, the International Monetary Fund said on Wednesday

[So here they are confirming that a geopolitical black swan and/or a shift in US interest rate policy will make the markets blow up.]

The IMF, an institution based in Washington that is the world’s premier watchdog for financial and economic stability

[Ha! The “world’s world’s premier watchdog for financial and economic stability”? How is that for adulatory propaganda? Such paragons of virtue these sage globalist organizations are! 🙂 I wonder if they also put such language about the IMF/World Bank/BIS in children’s textbooks: “the IMF, which provides the world with magical gumdrops and pretty, prissy ponies…”]

it also warned that financial market indicators suggested investor bets funded with borrowed money looked “excessive” and that markets could quickly deflate if there were surprises in U.S. monetary policy or the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East

[Again they are reinforcing the idea that the Fed’s overly low for overly long interest rate policy fueled excessive bets, and that these “could quickly deflate” if the market gets hit by any surprises. And speak of the devil…]

some Fed officials have stated publicly that the central bank should be ready to move rates up sooner and faster than financial markets expect given the spate of mostly good news on the U.S. economy.

[Bingo! Here we are shown how the Fed will blow things up: they will move rates up “sooner and faster than financial markets expect.”] <<<

Of course, this IMF story came out in a number of papers, and in some versions, they set out the expectation for when rates should rise. Here is a passage from the Guardian’s version of the story

>>> “Current plans to end tapering later this year and increase policy rates from the middle of next year appear appropriate, given the sizable slack,” the [IMF] report said. <<<

So the financial markets expect an interest rate increase next summer. If it comes earlier (such as in March) and/or it’s a larger increase than expected, it will spook the markets and trigger a crash. From a scan I did of financial articles, Yellen plans to raise the rate if the official unemployment figures are less that 6.5% and the official inflation rate is above 2%. Once those criteria are met and appear stable, she will do the deed.

The unemployment figures have already met the target for the past five months…
usunemployment

…and the inflation rate has been hovering near 2% for the past five months, exceeding it twice…
usinflation

So if we see the inflation statistics showing an uptick for a few of months in a row, we could get the early rate hike.

Should they pull the interest rate trigger this year or next and start the slow-motion train wreck, expect to also hear leaks emerging from the Fed audit that will likely commence next year. Worsening economic conditions and damning leaked information will provide quite a buildup to the Congress versus the Fed showdown in 2016.

By the way, don’t cry for Janet Yellen. She knows the role she must play, and she agreed to it. You can be sure she has a golden parachute waiting on the other side of what’s coming.

Till later, much love…

Will they audit the Fed? Not quite yet.

The House of Representatives passed a version of former Congressman Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed Bill today, and a companion bill has already been introduced in the Senate by Rand Paul. But it seems unlikely the legislation will pass the Senate this year. As Reuters notes…

“…the legislation approved by the Republican-dominated House is expected to meet a fate similar to its predecessor’s: death in the Democratic-controlled Senate

…there are no plans to consider it before the end of the year, a senior Senate Democratic aide said.”

Needless to say, the House knew the measure would meet this fate before they voted for it, so it would seem to be an election year ploy. With the Senate close to falling back under Republican control, inaction by Senate Democrats will give Republican candidates an appealing talking point: “Vote me in and I’ll make sure the Fed gets audited.” The associated PR campaign has already begun
harryreid

Once the new Congress takes office in January, there is a good chance the audit law will pass because it will facilitate the Globalist Banking Cabal’s Blame the Fed campaign. And as the Reuters article also notes…

“The new measure would require the Government Accountability Office to conduct an audit of the Federal Reserve Board and the 12 Federal Reserve Banks within 12 months of enactment. A report to Congress would be due 90 days after the audits were completed by the nonpartisan congressional watchdog.”

…so this would peg the report’s release to March 2016 (give or take a few months), which is the same year the BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement will be available to help the BRICS and other nations weather the storm of the Fed’s downfall. It is also the year certain alternative media propaganda figures have been talking about, as I noted in a previous entry. There are no coincidences here on the timing.

I’ll write more on this subject as the time approaches.

Much love…

Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce

For anyone who might still believe that the US/NATO versus Russia/BRICS geopolitical confrontation is realhere is a little blast from the past
ecocover
…It is the cover from the January 9, 1988 issue of The Economist magazine. Note the phoenix rising from the ashes of burning national currencies, including the dollar.

The cover relates to an article on pages 9-10 titled Get ready for the phoenix, which foretold the financial drama we are now watching unfold in real time. Upon stumbling across them, I found the cover art and the article so striking that I thought they might be an online forgery, so I verified their authenticity with a research librarian at the Newspaper and Current Periodical Room of the Library of Congress. Both the cover and the article are quite real. Here are some excerpts (not necessarily in the order in which they appear in the article)…

>>> THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century…

The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power

The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF

…Governments are far from ready to subordinate their domestic objectives to the goal of international stability. Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice

Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes. <<<

It’s all there: the SDR “cocktail” (basket) of currencies, the IMF’s central role, and the need to create “exchange rate upsets, stockmarket crashes, and economic slumps” to make the public accept it. Seeing such an accurate forecast/blueprint, one wonders who was behind its publishing. So if we look into The Economist magazine, we find it is headquartered just a few blocks from the City of London and is owned by The Economist Group, which itself is owned by some rather interesting characters…

“The Economist Group is 50% owned by Pearson PLC via The Financial Times Limited. The bulk of the remaining shares are held by individual shareholders including the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Agnelli and other family interests as well as a number of staff and former staff shareholders.”

Beyond the Rothschild and Agnelli families, who are widely rumored to be part of the Illuminati, the Schroder family is particularly worth noting. The Schroders (also spelled Schroeder) are an old German ruling class family from Hamburg. One of the Schroder brood, Johann Heinrich Schroder, settled in London and founded J. Henry Schroder & Co. (now known simply as “Schroders,” one of the UKs largest investment banks) back in 1818. Later, in 1923, the firm expanded into New York by establishing J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation. It is here that they joined with the Rockefeller family through Avery Rockefeller.

According to Avery’s bio…

“In 1928, Rockefeller joined the storied J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation and became Assistant Treasurer in 1931. On 8 July 1936, Rockefeller co-founded Schroder, Rockefeller & Co., Inc. Its purpose was to take over the underwriting and general securities business formerly carried out by the J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation.”

Schroder, Rockefeller & Co. is widely viewed as having been an integral part of the globalist bankers’ financial support infrastructure for the Nazis. And another of the Schroders, Johann Heinrich’s great-grandson, Baron Kurt von Schroeder (shown here in his Nuremberg picture)…
BKVS
…played a pivotal role..

“Schroeder was an important member of the Freundeskreis der Wirtschaft, which provided Adolf Hitler and his party with enough financial support to survive through the early 1930s. He also hosted a critical meeting on 4 January 1933 between Papen and Hitler that eventually led to Hitler’s appointment as Chancellor of Germany.”

The Nazis had (and continue to have) deep ties to the Anglo-American banking establishment, and also to The Economist. So this article came from a publication connected to the supposed “Nazi/Zionist Cabal.” Keep this in mind as we take a look at what that Cabal’s supposed enemies, the Chinese, are saying about the currently-unfolding global financial drama.

The Blueprint Revealed

I recently ran across a China Daily article titled Bracing for next big financial crisis, written by Giles Chance (a former World Bank staffer who is a professor at the Guanghua School of Management at Peking University). I strongly recommend following the link and reading the entire article, because it succinctly lays out the globalist plans and talking points for the next economic crisis. Once you correct for the article’s spin, it tells you everything. Here are some select passages, with my commentary added in brackets…

>>> Above the central banks, including the PBOC [People’s Bank of China], stands the Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, which oversees the activities of national banking and monetary systems. The integration of markets and economies in a globalized world has given the BIS an increasingly important role in providing global financial stability… <<<

[So here we have a Chinese propaganda organ telling us that the BIS is in charge of all the central banks, including China’s. This is in spite of the fact that the BIS was a joint creation of the London bankers and the Nazis (who are supposedly the bad guys the BRICS are fighting). I will share more about the BIS later in the article.]

>>> In 2007, the year before the financial crash, the BIS warned that the global financial system was becoming overstretched and that the banking systems in the developed world were coming under pressure. But although the BIS has great influence, it does not have the power to compel any central bank. It can advise and warn, but it cannot give orders, and it does not issue its own money. As we know, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the European Central Bank in Brussels did not act on the well-timed warning from the BIS. <<<

[This passage establishes the BIS’s wisdom and foresight, as opposed to the foolishness of the national central banks. It also carries the implication that the BIS should be given the power to compel the national central banks to follow its wise guidance. Not mentioned is the fact that the financial crash was deliberately triggered by the very bankers he’s writing about, and that the foolishness of the national central banks’ responses was quite calculated. It allowed the banksters to harvest enormous wealth from the public and set up the pretext for the global institutions to step in and “provide stability.”]

>>> Against that background, you would expect today that if the BIS issued another warning, the world would pay attention. At the end of June, BIS General Manager Jaime Caruana gave a speech at its headquarters that contained a strong note of caution: “A new policy compass is needed to help the global economy step out of the shadow of the global financial crisis…” <<<

[By  “a new policy compass,” he means a transition from the current dollar-based global financial system to the new, more centralized SDR-based multipolar/multilateral financial system]

>>> In his speech, Caruana blamed the continued dependence by the advanced economies, led by the United States, on ultra-loose monetary policy in place of the necessary deep-seated structural changes. <<<

[Here, he’s setting up the Federal Reserve (and the EU and Japan) to take the blame.]

>>> Caruana’s warning was reinforced by William White, head of the Economic Review and Development Committee at the headquarters of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development in Paris. As one of the very few experts who accurately forecast the 2008 crash, while head of research at the BIS, White is listened to with respect around the world.

In a recent interview, he said: “Riskfree bond rates are at enormously low levels, spreads are very low … it all looks and feels like 2007. And frankly, I think it’s worse than 2007…” <<<

[Here, another “wise” person from the BIS is warning that we’re approaching another financial crisis (that he and his buddies are engineering). It’s pretty easy to be a forecaster when you’re in on the plan. So if this year looks and feels like 2007, will next year be the next 2008?]

>>> But the US Federal Reserve Bank, the controller of the dollar-based global economy, does not agree with the BIS or William White. Several days after Caruana’s speech, Fed Governor Janet Yellen made it clear that she does not think that extremely low interest rates were the main culprit in the 2008 financial crisis, nor constitute the main problem now. <<<

[This is a very instructive passage. Note how the author specifically mentions the “dollar-based global economy.” Also note how he again paints the Federal Reserve as the morons who won’t listen to the sage globalists at the BIS. In this, he is setting up Janet Yellen for her upcoming scapegoat role, and he is tying interest rates to what will bring her down. The author says all this while failing to disclose that Janet Yellen is a member of the Board of Directors of the BIS, as is PBOC governor Zhou Xiaochuan]

>>> The disagreement between these two powerful financial institutions, the BIS and the New York Federal Reserve, has increased the risk that markets will crash as interest rates rise. Can China’s stability withstand another financial crash? Or would China emerge stronger? <<<

[Bingo! Here we are shown the trigger for the next financial crisis: Yellen will raise interest rates either “too soon” or by “too much” and crash the markets. “If only the wise BIS had had the power to rein in the Fed’s foolishness sooner, we could have avoided this,” they’ll say. 🙂 Now let’s read on and see if China will emerge stronger.]

>>> China certainly has economic problems… But the forward-looking, courageous determination of its government to grasp some important nettles in its economic reform program will make it a key part of any solution to another Western financial crisis. <<<

[Here, the author does the requisite ass-kissing to his Chinese hosts, then boldly states that China will be “a key part of any solution to another Western financial crisis.” Solution, as in problem – reaction – solution. And the article has already shown us who caused the problem part of the equation: the unruly Western central banks, especially the Fed.]

>>> With the BIS and the US Federal Reserve Bank on opposite sides of the fence about global financial stability, the likelihood of another global financial crisis grows. But next time would indeed be different, because Western taxpayers would refuse to pay for another huge bank bailout, as they did in 2008-09. <<<

[So again, in case you missed it: BIS = good = wise = solution and US Federal Reserve Bank = bad = problem = another global financial crisis.]

>>> The emerging world, led by China, is economically in a much stronger position relative to the advanced countries than six years ago. Although in 2009 China may not have expected its sudden promotion to world power status, the country’s emergence since the crash as a global pillar of growth has significantly increased its global influence. <<<

[China didn’t expect its promotion to world power status? Au contraire, they knew it was coming because the globalists promised it to them, just like they promised what comes next…]

>>> Another crash on Wall Street would reinforce the attraction of the renminbi as a store of value and anchor of stability for other regional currencies

It would underpin China’s global appeal as a peaceful force for stability in a volatile and troubled world, and hasten the re-engineering of shareholding in the major organizations of global governance, particularly at the World Bank and the IMF. Prepared or not, in the event of another crash China would find itself in a position of even greater global leadership and responsibility than today. <<<

[So here we are told that the next crash will be China’s gateway to top dog status, and it will “hasten the re-engineering of shareholding in the major organizations of global governance, particularly at the World Bank and the IMF.” This is exactly what I’ve been warning about. When the next crash comes, watch them break out their gold and other commodities to underwrite the global financial system in exchange for the governance changes.]

Now that we are done de-spinning the article, there are two things it brings up that deserve to be examined: the BIS and the Fed’s raising of interest rates…

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS)

This is the cover art for the BIS Archive Guide
BIS
…It proudly features Montagu Norman (the Bank of England Governor from 1920-1944, circled in pink) and Hjalmar Schacht (the President of the Reichsbank from 1923-31 and 1933-39, and Hitler’s Economics Minister from 1934 – 1937, circled in red). You’ll hear more about these two a little later in the article. But first, let’s have a look at a little piece of BIS history

>>> Between 1933 and 1945 the BIS board of directors included Walther Funk, a prominent Nazi official, and Emil Puhl, who were both convicted of war crimes at the Nuremberg trials after World War II, as well as Hermann Schmitz, the director of IG Farben, and Baron [Kurt] von Schroeder, the owner of the J.H.Stein Bank, which held the deposits of the Gestapo. There were allegations that the BIS had helped the Germans loot assets from occupied countries during World War II.

As a result of these allegations, at the Bretton Woods Conference held in July 1944, Norway proposed the “liquidation of the Bank for International Settlements at the earliest possible moment”. This resulted in the BIS being the subject of a disagreement between the American and British delegations. The liquidation of the bank was supported by other European delegates, as well as the United States (including Harry Dexter White, Secretary of the Treasury, and Henry Morgenthau), but opposed by John Maynard Keynes, head of the British delegation.

Fearing that the BIS would be dissolved by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Keynes went to Morgenthau hoping to prevent the dissolution, or have it postponed, but the next day the dissolution of the BIS was approved. However, the liquidation of the bank was never actually undertaken. In April 1945, the new U.S. president Harry S. Truman and the British government suspended the dissolution, and the decision to liquidate the BIS was officially reversed in 1948. <<<

So why were the British bankers so opposed to shutting down a bank with strong Nazi ties, you ask? Well, have a look at this UK Telegraph article (use this Internet Archive link if the direct link isn’t working)…
britnazi

I recommend reading the whole article, as it contains more juicy information than I can include in this post. Here are the most relevant excerpts for the topic at hand (with my comments in brackets)…

>>> The BIS was founded in 1930, in effect by Montagu Norman and his close friend Hjalmar Schacht, the former president of the Reichsbank, known as the father of the Nazi economic miracle. Schacht even referred to the BIS as “my” bank. The BIS is a unique hybrid: a commercial bank protected by international treaty. Its assets can never be seized, even in times of war. It pays no taxes on profits…

A key sentence in the Bank of England documents is found on page 1,295. It reads: “The general attitude of the Bank of England directors of the BIS during the war was governed by their anxiety to keep the BIS to play its part in the solution of post-war problems”[the bankers created the problem (World War 2), and they used the BIS to institute their solution (more centralized control of the world’s financial systems)]

…And here the secret history of the BIS and its strong relationship with the Bank of England becomes ever more murky.

During the war the BIS proclaimed that it was neutral, a view supported by the Bank of England. In fact the BIS was so entwined with the Nazi economy that it helped keep the Third Reich in business. It carried out foreign exchange deals for the Reichsbank; it accepted looted Nazi gold; it recognised the puppet regimes installed in occupied countries, which, together with the Third Reich, soon controlled the majority of the bank’s shares.

Indeed, the BIS was so useful for the Nazis that Emil Puhl, the vice-president of the Reichsbank and BIS director, referred to the BIS as the Reichsbank’s only “foreign branch”…

Every other month it hosts the Global Economy Meetings, where 60 of the most powerful central bankers, including Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England, meet. No details of meetings are released, even though the attendees are public servants, charged with managing national economies.

The BIS also hosts the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which regulates commercial banks, and the new Financial Stability Board, which coordinates national regulatory authorities. The BIS has made itself the central pillar of the global financial system. <<<

Speaking of these Global Economy Meetings, guess who attends them? According to the BIS website

“The GEM comprises the Governors of 30 BIS member central banks in major advanced and emerging market economies that account for about four fifths of global GDP. The members of the GEM are the central bank Governors from Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong SAR, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States and also the President of the European Central Bank and the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Governors from several other central banks attend the GEM as observers.”

So as you can see, beyond the public theater offered in Ukraine and the Middle East, and beyond all the East versus West propaganda offered in the mainstream and alternative media, China and the BRICS are dancing to the tune of the BIS puppetmasters just like everyone else. There is NO CONFLICT between “Nazi/Zionist” transatlantic bankers and BRICS bankers. In fact, Chinese and Russian banks (along with everyone else) are in the process of implementing the Basel 3 bank reforms put out by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which is hosted by the BIS.

According to this China Daily article

Under China’s implementation of Basel III guidelines, systemically important banks need a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 9.5 percent, with total buffers of 11.5 percent, before the end of 2018.”

…and according to this Russia Today article

Basel III – a new set of global banking standards scheduled to come into force in Russia this year – should become another stimulus for the country’s lenders to rely on its own funds rather than State support. One of the key Basel III requirements is tighter rules for a banks’ own capital.”

The whole East versus West propaganda campaign is aimed at giving the hypnotized public a fairytale storyline for all the changes they’re going through. It also offers them scapegoats on whom they can pin all their problems. The international bankers are going to crash the current system and blame it on the Federal Reserve, then they’re going to introduce the BRICS as the heroes who save the day.

In fact, part of the purpose for the recent creation of the BRICS Bank is to give the BRICS a lifeboat while the West founders from the crash. The BRICS Contingent Reserve Arrangement

“is a framework for the provision of support through liquidity and precautionary instruments in response to actual or potential short-term balance of payments pressures.

The objective of this reserve is to provide protection against global liquidity pressures. This includes currency issues where members’ national currencies are being adversely affected by global financial pressures.

The Bank would also provide assistance to other countries suffering from the economic volatility in the wake of the United States’ exit from its expansionary monetary policy.

All this being said, when will the crash begin, and how long will it last? Given that the last crash lasted from 2007-2009 and contained a shocking “Lehman Moment,” it stands to reason that the next crash would also be a slow-motion train wreck with an even more shocking Lehman Moment. If the propaganda setup for the collapse is any indicator, the train wreck and New Lehman Moment will involve the raising of the Fed interest rate by Janet Yellen and perhaps a black swan event like a false-flag cyberattack or terrorist attack.

Looking at the interest rate component, the Fed will be meeting this Tuesday and Wednesday (September 16-17), and that could give us an indication of when things might kick off. The general consensus of the Fed watchers seems to be that interest rates will go up starting in the summer of 2015, with some estimates saying as early as March 2015. Will this start the train wreck? And since the BRICS bank isn’t scheduled to start lending until 2016, the New Lehman might not happen till then. But then again, they can always surprise us.

[Update 1 – 18 September 2014]

I’ve published a new article that is an extension of this one, so in case you haven’t read it yet, here it is: The IMF and the Mainstream Media are following the “Blame the Fed” Script.

The Vatican is preparing to introduce the Anunnaki to us

The Jesuit Pope says, “Come meet your new space brothers!”…
francisaliens

With the globalists turning up the heat on all the mundane aspects of their buildup to the NWO, the woo woo aspects are moving forward as well. Yesterday, I encountered a Before Its News link that led to a post titled Vatican Preparing Statement on Extraterrestrial Life. Given the often questionable nature of such posts, I decided to look into it and see if everything checked out. It did. The Vatican is indeed preparing to “take us to their leader.”

The post, in turn, pointed to an article on Voxxi.com
vaticalien1
…Upon looking into Voxxi, I found out it’s a news site for English-speaking Hispanics that was started by the former Director of News at Agencia EFE, the world’s fourth largest wire service, so it is a mainstream site. Here are some relevant excerpts from the article…

>>>Many scientists affirm we’re not far from establishing the “First Contact,” given the advances made is astronomy. Because of this, the Vatican wishes to be ready with a statement. It might not be a easy task for the church to interpret holy scripture—if not analyzed properly—if life is found on other planets and man is not the only creature made in the image of God…

In 2009 Jose Gabriel Funes, the director of the Vatican Observatory, gave an interview to the Vatican’s L’Osservatore Romano newspaper, where he stated the existence of alien life posed no problems for Catholic theology.

Conspiracy theories aside, are we really that close to discovering extraterrestrial life? And if so, what will the Catholic Church say about it? Details of the statement the Vatican is working on have not been revealed publicly.<<<

So it seems that the ET rollout, should it actually occur, will begin with us supposedly discovering them through a telescope, then the Vatican will make its statement. Once the public has digested the idea, ET/EDs might actually show themselves, claiming, “We were waiting for you guys to discover our existence on your own; we didn’t want to show up out of the blue and shock you.”

Another notable thing about the Voxxi article was their inclusion of this link after the first paragraph…
vaticalien3
…It struck me as odd that they would think to connect the idea of alien intervention in Flight 370 to an article about a Vatican ET announcement. Although the linked article ridiculed the ET angle on Flight 370’s disappearance, I was left wondering if any ETs who show up might play that card. Will they arrive with the missing passengers and crew to show what sweet spaceguys they are?

As I kept investigating, I found another mainstream media mention of the Vatican and ETs in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. In a post titled Progress, American-style, sort of, the author ties an upcoming astrobiology symposium to the idea of suppressed UFO information…

>>>…what makes this symposium particularly mind-bending are the contortions in play to avoid contact with the UFO elephant in the room, especially given how so much of its content is devoted to hypothetical scenarios. Garnished heavily (not surprisingly) with SETI radioastronomers, its topics come with provocative titles like “The Moral Status of Non-Human Organisms,” “Would You Baptize an Extraterrestrial?,” “Equating Culture, Civilization, and Moral Development in Imagining ETI: Anthropocentric Assumptions?” and “Communicating With the Other.” But here’s the one that really grabs De Void by the eyeballs — “Alien Minds,” by Susan Schneider.<<<

The symposium to which the author refers is this one
vaticalien2
…And a notable attendee is the one to whom all the articles refer either directly or indirectly, Guy Consolmagno.

Guy Consolmagno is a Jesuit astronomer at the Vatican Observatory, which is headed by another Jesuit named Jose Gabriel Funes. Both portray aliens as good guys, with Consolmagno stating that he would baptize an alien and Funes stating “the extraterrestrial is my brother.” This raises the question: if the Jesuits (of all people) are pointing to the ETs and saying they’re good, is that how it really is? As I’ve written before, if aliens are real and they show up, it makes sense that the first ones we’ll see are the ones who have been here all along.

Interestingly, the “Vatican Preparing Statement on Extraterrestrial Life” post shares the Jesuit view…

>>>Not all will welcome a statement from Pope Francis advocating extraterrestrials as brothers and worthy of being baptized into the Christian faith. According to Chris Putnam and Tom Horn, authors of Exovaticana, Pope Francis I is preparing to lead the Catholic Church to embrace aliens as “brothers in Christ” – reflective of the 1950s and 1960s contactee reports of benevolent “space brothers.” Putnam’s and Horn’s Exovaticana portends a future religious war between those accepting extraterrestrials as “brothers in Christ” and those believing them to be returning demons about to enslave us. Despite the extensive scholarship found in Exovaticana, it unfortunately skews data towards an overly negative assessment of the motivations of extraterrestrial visitors. Thankfully, the Vatican’s evolving public position, as reflected by statements from its leading astronomers, shows a far more enlightened stance on how to consider the discovery of alien life from a theological perspective. A statement or “Urbi et Orbi” speech from Pope Francis expounding on various themes associated with the view that extraterrestrials are potential “brothers in Christ’ is a welcome position to take on a controversial issue with major world significance.<<<

As it turns out, the post appears to have been written by Michael Salla, the founder of exopolitics.org, and it’s good that he brings up Tom Horn.

Tom Horn is the Establishment’s “David Wilcock figure” in the Christian community. Like his New Age compatriot, he wrote a big, “scholarly” book…
apollyon
…that hyped all the various prophecies leading into December 21, 2012. When that date passed with a whimper, he withdrew the book, reworked it to point to 2016, and gave it a new title: Zenith 2016. Although he removed the ad for the original book from his site, I was able to find it in the Internet Archive. Here are the bullet points he presented…

>>>APOLLYON RISING 2012 REVEALS FOR THE FIRST TIME

> Unrecognized by the vast majority of peoples around the world is the greatest conspiracy of all time, sitting right out in the open in Washington DC and at the Vatican. It is an ancient, magical, talismanic diagram—the Lost Symbol—which waits its final use by the hidden, occult hand guiding the Secret Destiny of America toward the year 2012.

> To make sure they are prepared, the ritual for what is coming has been rehearsed in the Heredom by the Supreme Council over Washington DC with every passing US president starting with George Washington in anticipation of the deity’s return in 2012.

> Many US Founding fathers were aware of these prophecies and designed the Capitol City to serve as the home of these pagan gods on their return.

> This secret is also openly hidden in the most spectacular way in the US Capitol Dome, directly tying the US and Vatican to the Mesoamerican 2012 date.

> Catholic priests who tried to warn about what was coming died under mysterious circumstances.

> 200 Year Old cipher encoded on the Great Seal of the United States points to the same prophecy concerning the return of the gods in the year 2012.

> early 500 years ago the Maya prophesied about the Colonial date 1776 as the beginning of the last 13 katuns leading to apocalypse in 2012. When academic Richard N. Luxton interpreted The Book of Chumayel: The Counsel Book of the Yucatec Maya 1539–1638, he was astonished to find it was connected to the “Christian Last Judgment” and the date 2012.

>  couple modern “Mayan elders” – who have been getting themselves in the news lately by claiming the year 2012 will not lead to the end of the world – are covering up how their prophecies diametrically contradict the prophecies of their forefathers including the Maya, Aztec, and numerous other ancient peoples who foresaw this time as portending destruction and “judgment from the gods.”

> 200 Years ago Cherokee Indians prophesied likewise and set their calendar, like the Maya and Aztec, to end in the year 2012.

> In more than one place in the New Testament, scripture reveals by the same name that the deity encoded in the Masonic prophecy on the Great Seal and elsewhere throughout Washington DC will be the dreaded Antichrist.

> Over 700 years ago Orthodox Jewish priests prophesied in the Zohar that their Messiah would arrive in the year 2012.

> The first degree Masonic Tracing Board contains the same prophecy toward the year 2012.

> Jesus Himself in Matthew 24 may have set the date for the apocalypse around the year 2012.

> This is a short sample of the HUNDREDS of new revelations in Apollyon Rising 2012.<<<

Very Wilcockian, wasn’t it? 😉 And wouldn’t you know it, David Wilcock has also started talking about 2016. Here is a passage from one of the comments he left on Benjamin Fulford’s blog

>>>Then, since The Synchronicity Key talks about how cycles are always at play in the cases of reincarnation, I said “could there be an American Revolution / BRICS revolution cycle playing out?”

I already saw a Rome / US overlap predicting key events in 2014, but we can’t be sure that it will “all” happen in one year. This is all taking longer than I thought, though there is definite progress along the way.

That led to a quick calculation. The main cycles I identified were the Zodiac cycle of 2,160 years (such as between Rome and the US) and the Zodiac quarter-cycle of 539 years (such as the precise time-lock between the Battle of Swiecino and 9/11, down to a few days.)

Another harmonic cycle is 120 years — though the ‘century’ of 100 years is also cyclical. 120 years divides into the “Great Year” of 25,920 years exactly 216 times, making it perfectly harmonic.

The first 120 years after the American Revolution brings us to 1896, which was the precise year that all the problems began with America turning into a war-making state. This was when McKinley got elected and America immediately started moving into the international arena as an imperial power, starting a chain of events that led to the Federal Reserve being founded.

I already have this in the book, but only equated 1896 to a cross-over with Rome in the Zodiac cycle. I never caught that 1896 is also 120 years after the American Revolution.

So if this first cycle is where the problem got a lot worse, 120 years later it may finally resolve. At the speed things are now going, the cycle equivalent of two 120-year cycles lands on July 4, 2016 — 240 years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence.<<<

Looking at everything Horn and Wilcock have written, I am compelled to forge a new scientific axiom: prophecy + astrology + numerology = BS spiritual propaganda

2016 is an interesting year in one respect, though: how it might fit in with Christian “End Times” prophecy. There are many different interpretations of Biblical prophecy, but the “Christian Watchman” Propaganda Corps with whom Tom Horn frequently interacts have been trumpeting a version that boils down to something like this…

There will be seven years of tribulation that feature wars and rumors of wars, famine, disease, earthquakes in diverse places, etc. To save us from these disasters, the “Antichrist” will come on the scene posing as the “real Christ.” He/she/it will bring a temporary peace and rule for a short time, then will be swept aside when the “real Christ” stages his Second Coming.

Looking at this script, I am left wondering if the 2007-2009 financial crisis might count as the beginning of the Tribulation Period. If so, the seven years would expire sometime from 2014 through 2016. And if the globalists are trying to act out a scenario somewhat like this, how will they play it? Will the coming “BRICS-founded” Multipolar/Multilateral NWO bring in the Antichrist character? Or will the decoy “Nazionist” dark NWO and Obama be painted as the Antichrist side who are vanquished by the BRICS NWO and the “real Christ” character?

However they play it, it is important to remember that both the “Antichrist” and the “real Christ” are scripted characters in a Blood Cult play. They are the dialectic thesis and antithesis of the False God / Yahweh / Demiurge spiritual paradigm, and neither one is on humanity’s side.

It is also important to note that Christianity is a religion centered on Anunnaki (a.k.a. Elohim) worship. Under the Biblical paradigm, the beings who supposedly created modern man are called the Elohim; under the Sumerian paradigm, those same beings are called the Anunnaki. And whether the Anunnaki/Elohim are mythological or real, they are bad news for Planet Earth.

All this being said, if any ET/EDs show up in the next several years, who will we really be meeting? Will they be the real-deal Anunnaki flying in on spaceships, or will they be the genetically-engineered spawn of underground labs flying in on black budget aerospace craft? It all depends on whether the beings worshipped by the “elite” are genuine ET/EDs or just myths they finally have the technology to bring to life.

[Update 1 – 13 September 2014]

This article was reposted on Ascensionwithearth.com, and an interesting comment was left by one of the readers. I thought I’d share the comment and my response…

Commenter “Lozion”: Ken, just curious is this Apollyon (Abaddon) Horn refers to is another epithet for Antichrist? If yes, then I would theorize this being is the head of the Annunaki (sons of An), Enlil (otherwise known as YHWE and to the Gnostics, the Demiurge) trying to sell himself as the Messiah of our times. Hey, maybe we’ll finally get to meet the Big Enlilada! 😉

My Response: I included Yahweh in the False God/ Yahweh/ Demiurge sandwich for the sake of the Christians, who are programmed to see him as the Big Kahuna. From the various versions of the Sumerian Anunnaki narrative I’ve encountered, though, he is below the actual Anunnaki godking and is aligned with the loyalist faction that believes the human slaves are to be kept barefoot and ignorant, and are not to [be] bred with. The rebels, on the other hand, gave us some degree of knowledge (perhaps in hope of winning us to their side), and fancy “monkey love.” This might explain why I’ve heard certain self-proclaimed “Satanists” complaining, “We tried to give you freedom, but you love being slaves. So we’re going to give you exactly what you want.”

Of the two supposed factions, I am sympathetic to the rebels because I despise the concept of “royalty” in any form, and also because they are simply more fun. But I would choose neither side. Humanity must find a middle path, and we must walk it ourselves.

To answer your question, though, Tom Horn does seem to label “Apollyon” as the “Antichrist.”
__________

On an unrelated note, I’ve come across some mainstream globalist propaganda from 1988 and 2014 that confirms the West versus East conflict is a sham. Look for a big article about it on Monday.

[Update 2 – 14 September 2014]

Commenter “Lozion”: According to Annunaki ‘canon’, the rebels were headed by An’s older son and Enlil’s half-brother Enki, who genetically engineered us (a triplicity of genes from their DNA, native Neanderthal and from IGIGI, who were slaves from a foreign conquered planet) with the help of Ninhursag. They were the ones who thought humans should be allowed to evolve on their own and tried to protect us to a degree against Enlil’s wrath. The God/King you refer to would be An who left their sons to their schemes while busy with affairs far away

My Response: Yes, that’s one version I’ve heard. The herebedragons site has a page that shows what you’re talking about: http://herebedragons.weebly.com/family-tree.html

Here is the family diagram: http://herebedragons.weebly.com/uploads/6/3/2/7/6327404/4449995.jpg?902

Commenter “Lozion”: I’ve started a thread on the Conscious Hugs forum on this subject if anyone cares to contribute. See here: http://fora.conscioushugs.com/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=786

Yes, I’ve seen that diagram before. Add Nergal under Enlil.

My Response: I would hasten to add a word of caution on this matter: be wary of any historical or mythical narrative that would sway you to take sides in an alien civil war. If you choose a side, you choose the war, and if you choose the war, you invite attack upon yourself.

If a “red gang” member came to your door and told you, “You should join our war against the ‘blue gang.’ They want to kill everyone in the ‘hood, so if we lose, you die,” would you believe him? While such a claim could possibly be true, it is more likely a ruse to scare you into cooperation. It’s more likely that the other gang will want to profit off you than kill you. You can’t sell drugs to a dead man, nor can you enslave him.

If there is any reality to the Enki versus Enlil narrative, there are three ways to look at it:

1) It is a real civil war within the Anunnaki kingdom. If this is the case, we should leave them to settle their conflicts themselves while we deal with our own challenges ourselves. To join one side against the other is to expose ourselves to potential ruin.

2) It is a contrived situation Anu put in play to ensure that one of his sons couldn’t set up his own kingdom here. By keeping the two feuding, neither brother can get firm control of the planet. All Anu has to do is sit back and maintain a balance of forces by providing support to one or the other when he grows weak. If this is the case, it has nothing to do with us and we should maintain our focus on the self-liberation of our species.

3) It is a dialectic play put on for human consumption. By recruiting some humans to Enki and others to Enlil, they keep us fighting amongst ourselves. Some may point to supposed evidence (most notably in the Indian ancient texts) of an antediluvian nuclear war as proof that there are two alien factions fighting, but I would point such people to World War 2. It was a massive conflict that involved nuclear explosions, but it was fought by two alliances of human states that were pitted against each other by a transnational “elite.” The antediluvian war, if it actually happened, might have been the same sort of deal: humans pitted against each other by a hidden hand.

It seems prudent to stay out of any wars, either human or alien. I think it better to free myself, then help free my community. And once my community is free, we can network with other such communities until the whole world is free.

Love always…

Dear David Wilcock, PressTV, and RT: It’s all about the CENTRAL BANKERS, not the Nazis

Here are the bad guys who’ve been causing all our problems…
nazihydra
…Once the heroic politicians and central bankers of the paradise-like BRICS nations defeat them, all will be right again in the world… NOT.

A couple of days ago, I ran across a short essay from globalist spokesman David Wilcock (and left some comments underneath it). His basic point was that he saw two Disney movies that had plot elements kinda similar to the geopolitical narrative he’s been putting out, so that constitutes the “most compelling pieces of physical proof that what we have been talking about is real.” After recovering from the shock of encountering such absurdity, I started wondering…

Is this “blame the Nazis (and Zionists)” propaganda theme something only fringe conmen like Wilcock, Fulford and Keenan are putting out, or do the globalists really intend to roll it out as the mainstream cover story?

To answer this question, I searched BRICS mainstream propaganda outlets RT and PressTV, and I found that they had indeed exposed their readers to the Nazi narrative. To see what they’ve been saying, let’s have a look at RT first.

RT has introduced their readers to the narrative through articles in their Op-Edge section written by Tony Gosling…
gosling

Here is the first one I found: From ‘Free’ West to fascist fire-starters in 60 yrs: Where did we go so wrong? And here are some relevant excerpts…

“The seeds of the West’s succession of bloodbaths in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and possibly Syria were sown in the final days of World War II

…So it was the failure of the post-war Western alliance to deliver justice in the decades after World War II that is behind the West’s obsession with military adventurism. That’s why we struggle to deliver justice and democracy in the West to this day.

Humanity will not shake itself free of the curse of bigger and better guns in the nuclear age until it recognizes that Nazism was not defeated in 1945, but embraced by Western governments, big business and yes, even by the Israeli state.”

Like Benjamin Fulford, Gosling pegs the beginning of the West’s troubles to “the final days of World War II,” and through his narrative, he seems to imply that the Western Establishment was all about “justice and democracy” before the Nazis were embraced by them and corrupted them. Any rational person should know better than this.

But let’s go on to the second: A betrayal too far: Only brutal honesty will do at Arnhem’s 70th anniversary. Here are some salient points…

>>>Bilderberg is where the transatlantic banking, royal, media and corporate elite give our politicians their orders, and has been meeting annually in Europe or North America from 1954 to this day. Its connection to NATO is umbilical, yet often overlooked, as all Bilderberg steering group members and important attendees are from the NATO countries.

NATO’s Nazi ties go right back to the supposedly defensive alliance’s first meetings. Quoted in AJ Barker’s “Waffen SS at War”, HIAG, the SS veterans association’s chief after the war, former Eastern front Panzer corps General Paul Hausser, “claimed that the foreign units of the SS were really the precursors of the NATO army.”

Critics point out that, through politically motivated state terror campaigns such as Operation Gladio, which left hundreds of innocent European civilians dead, right through to liaison with Ukraine’s far right paramilitaries UNA/UNSO, NATO’s covert operations with fascist groups have been continuous since the end of World War II. As Italian “gladiator” Vincenzo Vinciguerra put it in a BBC Timewatch documentary: “In 1945 World War Two ended, and World War Three began.”<<<

So Bilderberg = NATO = Nazi fascists, and that is what ruined the West, according to Tony. Although he does mention the “banking, royal, media and corporate elite,” this time, he fails to point out that Nazism, just like Communism and a dozen other ideological “isms,” is driven by the banksters and their agenda, not the other way around.

The truth is that the “elite” don’t give a rat’s ass about ideologies like Nazism; what matters to them is centralization of wealth and power into their hands. Ideologies, like religions, are mere tools they use for socioeconomic experimentation and global geopolitical engineering. The central banking families are no more Nazis than they are Islamists, but they do support both movements (and many more) to move the global population in the directions they want them to go.

Moving on to PressTV, they have introduced their readers to the Nazi narrative through another UK Zone columnist, Finian Cunningham (this is starting to smell like MI5/6)…
finian
..and through an Operation Paperclip book review.

The book review was titled US gave immunity to war criminals, and here are some highlights…

“After World War II, the U.S. military hired sixteen hundred former Nazi scientists and doctors, including some of Adolf Hitler’s closest collaborators…

The U.S. military shifted in numerous ways when former Nazis were put into prominent positions

Permanent war thinking, limitless war thinking, and creative war thinking in which science and technology overshadowed death and suffering, all went mainstream…

In 1947 Operation Paperclip, still rather small, was in danger of being terminated. Instead, Truman transformed the U.S. military with the National Security Act, and created the best ally that Operation Paperclip could want: the CIA.”

The overall impression created by this article is that the transplanted Nazis were the force that drove America’s aggression after WW2 (not the globalist agenda, which is never mentioned).

And Finians article was titled US driven by Nazi war machine. Here is a key passage…

The absorption of Nazi military practice and intelligence into the CIA and other Western organizations at the end of the Second World War had fateful and far-reaching pernicious consequences – consequences that are becoming more and more manifest today, as US-led wars of aggression rage around the world.

If we want to understand why US-led wars of aggression, covert and overt, are plaguing the planet, from Iraq, Afghanistan, to Libya, Syria and Iran, we can gain much insight into today’s problems by going back to events at the end of the Second World War.”

Again we detect the characteristic propaganda pattern: the Paperclip/Rat Line Nazis ruined poor little innocent America. 🙂 It’s amazing that the Pentagon figured out how to firebomb and nuke entire cities before the evil Nazis came along.

Finian goes on from there to make a mistake. He claims that Nazi intelligence chief Reinhard Gehlen was close with OSS chief “John Foster Dulles,” but it was John Foster’s brother Allen who was in the OSS. Allen Dulles went on to become the first civilian Director of the Central Intelligence agency, and John Foster went on to become US Secretary of State. And looking at the two Dulles brothers is quite informative in discovering who was really in the driver’s seat of the West’s pre-and-post-WW2 behavior.

Here are some key points of information about the Dulles brothers and their connections:

John Foster Dulles
jfdulles

> was a US Secretary of State

> was a Trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation from 1935 to 1952 (and served as its Chairman from 1950-1952).

> was “an early member, along with future First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, of the League of Free Nations Association, founded in 1918 and after 1923 known as the Foreign Policy Association, which supported American membership in the League of Nations.”

> “participated in the San Francisco Conference as an adviser to Arthur H. Vandenberg and helped draft the preamble to the United Nations Charter.”

> was a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations

> and had a son, Avery, who went on to become a Jesuit Cardinal in the Roman Catholic Church…
averydulles

 

Allen Dulles
allendulles

> was the first civilian Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

> “became a director of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1927″

> and “served as legal adviser to the delegations on arms limitation at the League of Nations

In addition to these points, it’s worth noting a passage from David Rockefeller’s bio

Rockefeller also reportedly has connections to Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). As well as knowing Allen Dulles and his brother John Foster Dulles—who was an in-law of the family since his college years, it was in Rockefeller Center that Allen Dulles had set up his WWII operational center after Pearl Harbor, liaising closely with MI6 which also had their principal U.S. operation in the Center.”

So both Allen Dulles and MI6 had their bases of operation in Rockefeller Center, and both Allen Dulles and John Foster Dulles had strong personal connections to the Rockefeller bankster family, the Jesuits, and many top globalist organizations. Given all this, was it their love of Nazism that led them to support Hitler’s rise and aggression, or was it the globalist bankster agenda that guided their actions? A simple application of common sense should provide the answer (Hitler’s war was a nice setup for the United Nations, the seed of global governance).

If we boil the “blame the Nazis and Zionists (Nazionist)” propaganda paradigm down to its bare bones…

…this is the lie:

The problem is confined to the West and is caused by the Nazionists.

Therefore, once the Nazionists are taken down, the problem is solved.

…and this is the truth:

The problem is worldwide and is caused by the globalist banksters.

Therefore, once the Nazionists are taken down, the problem will still be left standing.

The first step to stopping them is to stop falling for their BS.

In closing, allow me to say this to our globalist bankster buddies…

By all means, go ahead and set out your Nazionist punch bowl. I’m gonna crap in it. Let’s see if anyone notices. 😉

Much love to all….

ISIS: A globalist scheme to make the West look evil and the BRICS look good (Update 1 – NATO and the Russian Financial Sector)

After seeing this on disinformation source Tom Heneghan’s latest update
isisdial
…and this on Press TV
isispress
…it became clearer to me exactly how ISIS is being utilized in the globalists’ West versus East dialectic.

In my last update, I wrote this about the globalist strategy for the September – November time frame: “Bad Western conduct will also be clearly noted in the press. This combination of economic weakness and bad behavior will be seized upon by the BRICS nations as they press for the dissolution of Western dominance of the IMF and related institutions.” Well, the whole ISIS debacle is a glaring example of this; it is purposely transparent foolishness that sets up the BRICS alliance for an easy propaganda win.

And the BRICS knock it out of the park!…

bricstee

It’s really a very simple strategy on the globalists’ part: have the Western division (which controls the old financial system) create transparent havoc, then have the Eastern division (which will bring in the new financial system) point out the West’s misconduct and earn trust from the public. The people will then see the BRICS as straight talking guys who are different from the evildoers in NATO. Of course, all one needs to do to see through this propaganda campaign is look at how the 99% are treated in the BRICS countries. Despite the stage plays the G20 politicians put on for public consumption, all the G20 central bankers are working from the same script.

Getting back to the current propaganda campaign, if you look closely at how faux-truthers like Heneghan are outing ISIS, you’ll see that they are following the “blame the Western Nazis / Zionists” template I talked about in this entry. Here is the title of one of Heneghan’s other articles on the subject: ISIS PsyOp Exposed as British Intelligence-NAZI Paperclip U.S. NSA Trickery. The article also contains information that the Mossad (Zionists) trained the ISIS leader. Such information is also parroted by BRICS-leaning PressTV: Documents show al-Baghdadi trained by MOSSAD (for an example of PressTV’s allegiance, see BRICS ‘counterbalance’ to Anglo-American hegemony).

PressTV is state-funded and is a division of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB). IRIB is independent of the Iranian government, but is said to be close to the country’s conservative political faction, especially the elite Revolutionary Guards [RG].” And back when I was looking into the IMF’s activities, I briefly fell into the dialectic trap and thought that the Guards might actually be enemies to the globalists. When I found out that PressTV was a Revolutionary Guards media asset, though, I realized that both PressTV and the RG were actually working on the BRICS side of the globalist dialectic.

As we look ahead to the coming week, we find Congressional leaders publicly calling for Obama to “form a strategy” against ISIS before the Thursday-Friday NATO summit, and this presumably means they are urging him to begin airstrikes in Syria. And if you recall the controversy over potential US strikes on Syria last year, it was said

>>>The warnings raise the possibility of a supposedly “limited” strike on Syria turning into a proxy tit-for-tat between Russia and the U.S.

Rep. George Holding, R-N.C., went further during a hearing on Syria on Wednesday, pressing military officials on what the U.S. would do “if Russia decided to strike at us in that theater.”

“We can certainly say that Russia would have options to strike us in that theater in retaliation for us striking their ally,” he warned.

Dempsey declined to engage in that discussion, saying only that “Russia has capabilities that range from the asymmetric, including cyber, all the way up through strategic nuclear weapons. And again, it wouldn’t be helpful in this setting to speculate about that.”<<<

So airstrikes on Syria (on top of Ukraine-related economic sanctions) might very well be the trigger to unleash the globalists’ long planned cyberattack against the old financial system (to be pinned on Russia). They might also be the trigger for biological and conventional terror attacks in the US (to be pinned on ISIS – Lawmakers: Islamic State groups wants to hit US). Should such attacks occur, it doesn’t necessarily mean there will be a total economic collapse or instant Armageddon…

thunderdome

…The attacks can be moderated in such a way to achieve specific globalist outcomes without taking us beyond Thunderdome, so don’t have a cow.

[Update 1 – 1 September 2014]

NATO and the Russian Financial Sector

While looking into the propaganda setup for the NATO meeting this week, I came across an FT article titled “Three critical tests for Nato leaders in Wales” (it’s behind a paywall, so search for the title in Google News to access it). I found this part interesting…

“Allied leaders in Wales must counter by adopting the only measures that might give Mr Putin pause – the strongest sanctions to date, targeted on Russia’s critical financial sector.”

So NATO might be targeting Russia’s financial sector, eh? 🙂 That smells like the perfect pretext for a retaliatory cyberattack….

With love….