This attack could employ either a nuclear warhead or an explosives-packed ship or sub and would be attributed to North Korea. Here is the initial indicator (from Update 13‘s postscript)…
A reader sent me a link on the upcoming nuclear response exercise Gotham Shield 2017. Upon looking into it, it appears to be a real exercise, and it is already underway…
…from a Google cache from the National Response Team website
Normally I’d pay no mind to such a routine exercise, but given that it takes place during the first crisis threshold, that there are ongoing nuclear threats from North Korea, and that the name of the exercise references Batman (which brings back memories of Sandy Hook), I’m a tad uncomfortable with it. I’ll therefore enhance and expand this postscript tomorrow; you can’t be too careful I suppose.
P.P.S. – Whilst brainstorming on Gotham Shield, some questions occurred to me: Will the globalists literally blow up the old UN to build the “new” UN? Technically, North Korea is still at war with the UN, which authorized the US involvement there. If the UN were blown up, would it be rebuilt in New York or relocated to Ordos, China (ordo ab chao)? I’ll cover this tomorrow.
More details to follow by morning. Hopefully by then they will have canceled the attack due to exposure.
[Addendum – 21 April 2017]
Having been in blogging for a while now, I’ve grown quite hesitant to issue alerts like this. Because if I’m wrong, the event won’t happen and I’ll look like an as*hole. And if I’m right, the event won’t happen because I’ve exposed their methods and objectives, and I’ll look like an as*hole. Fortunately, I have both extensive experience and a high tolerance for looking like an as*hole. And what made me issue this alert was the sheer strategic brilliance of such an attack. Just think about it…
> The overarching goal of all the current geopolitical drama is to “reform” the UN into the NWO, and is there any more sure way of forcing immediate reform than literally blowing up the existing UN and compelling the nations to rebuild both its physical and organizational structure?
> The globalist “elite” are obsessed with the symbolism of the phoenix, the bird which explodes into flames and is then reborn from its own ashes. Now look again at the mural located in the UN’s Security Council chamber…
The mural actually depicts the Security Council chamber itself. Look at the color of the wall in the background of the mural, then look at the color of the wall surrounding the mural. Also look at the shape and color of the object on which the phoenix is standing in the mural, then look at the semi-circular desk at which the Security Council members sit. You’ll see that the phoenix is actually standing on its ashes which lie on the desk of the Security Council. But in the mural, the desk has a disfigured appearance, as if it’s been melted, and the ashes of the old phoenix lie on the burnt table.
So the mural depicts the New World Order phoenix standing in the ashes of the old UN on the burnt Security Council desk. It portrays the destruction of the Security Council chamber by fire. Blowing up the UN complex thus becomes the fulfillment of the mural.
> The Korean War was the first major test of the UN, and in the nearly 67 years since the war began in June of 1950, the UN has lacked the power to bring it to a close. The shooting stopped with an armistice, not a peace treaty; technically speaking, the UN and North Korea are still at war. So is there any more effective and dramatic way to demonstrate the “too weak” nature of the current UN structure than having it be destroyed by North Korea? From the ashes of the weak, destroyed UN would rise a new, stronger UN (the New World Order) that would have the power to decisively deal with nations that don’t toe the line.
> With all of the nuclear threats currently being made by North Korea, everyone is focused on the security of Seoul, Japan, Hawaii, and the western US. And since everyone in the US is looking west, a North Korean attack in the east would catch the whole country by surprise. According to the geopolitical script, an attack on New York “would strike at the very heart of North Korea’s enemies, the UN and the US” and it would be “strategically brilliant, but suicidal.” “The insane Kim Jong-un went out in a blaze of glory,” they’d say.
> Since the North Koreans reportedly lack an ICBM capable of reaching New York, the attack would most likely be seaborne. It could take the form of a cruise missile or medium range ballistic missile fired from an offshore submarine or freighter. Or to be more sure of the attack’s success, it could take the form of a suicide boat or sub that sails right up to the UN.
Now if you think of the MOAB attack that happened in Afghanistan a few days ago, its explosive yield was the equivalent of 11 tons of TNT, and a boat or sub could carry much more than 11 tons of high explosive (it would be the Mother Of All Boats). A boat or sub could also carry one of North Korea’s nukes, which are estimated by some sources to have a 10 kiloton yield (the same yield featured in the Gotham Shield exercise).
My best guess is that one of North Korea’s missing subs will surface in the shipping channel, sail right up to the UN, and blow its payload (either nuclear, conventional, or conventional / radiological). To ensure that the attack is successful, though, it would be conducted either by the Pentagon or by North Koreans with Pentagon engineering and logistical assistance.
> As previously mentioned, the name of the nuclear response exercise references Batman, and can you remember the plot of the last “Dark Knight” movie? It involved an attempt to blow up Gotham with a nuclear bomb, but Batman ended up flying the bomb away from the city and it blew up over the bay. In this “North Korean” attack, a nuclear bomb could blow up over the water right next to the UN. Is this just a coincidence?
Now that I’ve outlined my thoughts about the potential (but hopefully now cancelled) attack, let me close by sharing a comment from a reader…
“…what I find hard to accept is your claim that the “globalists” are regularly obliged to change their plans as a direct consequence of your exposing these in advance, and yet they do not take any action against your website, or even directly against you; surely if you were having such an effect on such powerful people they would use various means to stop you exposing their plans?
I would be grateful to hear your thoughts on this point.”
This is my response…
There is nothing special about me or my website; the globalists shy away from exposure from any sufficiently public source because it fundamentally alters the outcome of the exposed operation. Why risk the unknowable and potentially disastrous consequences of running an exposed op when they have unexposed contingency plans to which they can turn? Read The Magician and the Heckler for more of my thoughts on this.
As for why they don’t harm me, here are two potential reasons…
1) The “elite” are not mindless thugs; they are mindful thugs, and they seem to operate from their own system of principles which outline fair play and sound procedure in what they do. For whatever reason, coming after me may violate fair play and/or sound procedure.
2) They know I’m just the tip of the iceberg, and shaving off the tip makes the iceberg all the more dangerous (because you can’t see where it is or where it’s going). The fact that I’m writing about a subject tells them that there are thousands of others around the world who have come to the same conclusions, and there are many thousands more who are just one or two steps away from coming to those conclusions.
My blog serves as a place where people can go to see their own thoughts, complete their own thoughts, and validate their own thoughts. It also serves as a place for those who sincerely seek truth to get the first unpleasant slap in the face to wake them to illusions in which they’ve become mired.
In short, I’m just a network printer, and if they destroy the printer, they won’t know what’s going on in the network.
And with that, I’ll call this alert complete (for now).
(P.S. – 21 April 2017) – I forgot to explain why I fingered Ordos, China as the city in which the new UN will meet. It’s really just a hunch on my part, but there are reasons for it. I’ll write about it if developments warrant it.
(P.S. – 23 April 2017) – Yikes!…
…From CBS News
This Trump-UN Security Council meeting is clearly part of the preparation for the UN attack in New York. But are they holding it because it couldn’t be cancelled even though the attack was cancelled, or because the attack ISN’T cancelled?
In case it isn’t cancelled, here is the scenario for an April 24/25 attack…
North Korea’s two greatest enemies, the sanction-threatening UN Security Council and the military strike-threatening President of the United States will pose together for a photo in Washington, D.C. on April 24 at around noon. In Pyongyang time, that is 12:30 AM of April 25, and April 25 has been rumored as the highest probability date for a nuclear test…
…From Zero Hedge
So North Korea could potentially do the nuke test as soon as the very moment Trump and the UNSC take the picture. And should the US or China strike the nuclear test site either preemptively or after the fact, it would set in motion North Korea’s counterstrike against the US and UN, which could come as early as tomorrow afternoon in New York. It’s also possible that one of the “missing subs” could fire a missile at Washington.
If they go forward with the attack, watch for the controlled alt-media to identify it as a false-flag and ultimately blame it on “warmongering Neocon/Neolib Deep State elements in the Pentagon and three-letter agencies.”
Let’s just hope they’re going through with tomorrow’s meeting because it would have looked suspicious to cancel it.
(P.S. – 25 April 2017) – More dates and triggers & Trump’s Grand Strategy
Once we reach 11:30 AM EDT today, it will be midnight in Pyongyang and we will have gotten through the 25th without any trouble. But even though the 25th was considered the highest probability date for a nuclear test (which would trigger follow-on events), there are other high probability dates to watch from now through May 9. These dates are…
April 26 – The day Washington, D.C. is holding a “full-scale” terror drill while the entire US Senate goes to the White House for a briefing on North Korea.
April 28 – The day that Congress must pass the continuing resolution to keep the government from shutting down on Trump’s 100th day as president.
April 30 – Walpurgis Night, the “Witches’ Sabbath.”
May 1 – May Day/Beltane, reputedly a “Satanic holiday.”
May 7-9 – The timeframe that starts with the second round of the French election and ends with the South Korean presidential election.
Given that a nuclear test, a pre-positioned US or Chinese strike, and a pre-positioned North Korean counterstrike can all occur within hours of each other, here are the reasons the dates mentioned are good candidates…
April 26 – Both the Washington, DC-area “full-scale anti-terror” exercise and the New York-area Gotham Shield exercise will be in simultaneous operation in both potential target cities that day, so the deployed assets can make sure that the attacks will go down according to the script.
April 28 – A North Korean counterstrike on Washington, DC that day could disrupt Congress’ ability to pass the continuing resolution, resulting in a government shutdown on April 29, Trump’s 100th day in office. Depending on how they play the aftermath, it could be a momentary shutdown that serves as an “up yours” from Kim to Trump, or it could result in a shutdown that spans into May, disrupting government services.
April 30/May 1 – Triggering everything on one of these days would attach a “Satanic” signature to the whole thing. This would serve the Satanists versus Christians dialectic the globalists are running in conjunction with the West versus East dialectic.
May 7-9 – If the test / strike / counterstrike sequence were done on one of these days, it could result in a disrupted presidential election and disarray in South Korea.
As for Trump meeting with the UN Security Council and the US Senate, two purposes are being served:
1) It publicly portrays Trump as lining up support for an imminent military intervention “if the need arises,” and
2) It publicly brings the UN into the mix, thus establishing them as a potential target of the North Koreans. “Trump bad! UN bad! We strike now!” Kim would proclaim.
So as we approach these days, watch for 3 triggers…
1) The test-launch of an ICBM by North Korea
2) A nuclear test by North Korea
3) A preemptive strike on North Korea by the US or China
The day you see one or more of these triggers pulled, a sh*tstorm will likely follow, including the possible attacks on Washington, DC and the UN complex in New York.
TRUMP’S GRAND STRATEGY
If you look at everything that’s going on from the perspective of a conventional geopolitical script, you would think that Trump is engaging in a huge bluff. His strategy of…
- talking of preemptive strikes,
- having Navy Seals train for “regime decapitation,”
- (supposedly) sending three aircraft carriers to the Sea of Japan,
- sending a nuclear missile sub to South Korea, and
- putting on the big White House show with the UNSC and the Senate
…is all meant to convince Kim Jong-un that Trump will really attack, even though he actually has no intention of doing so. And this real-appearing threat of force together with very real economic strangulation administered by the UN and China is meant to force an end to Kim’s nuclear and missile programs, thus giving Trump a “yuge” first-year accomplishment as president.
The problem is, though, that the whole situation sets up opportunities for the globalists to take a huge, sudden leap forward in their agenda (such as with a UN attack). So does the globalist script call for a Trump bluff and win, or for a huge, sudden leap into the Big Crisis? It could go either way, and since I’ve already covered how it could lead to the Big Crisis, let’s look at why they’d have Trump bluff and win…
A Trump victory in “ridding Asia of the North Korean nuclear threat” would be part of his “secret grand strategy” of using the “Neocon-Neolib Deep State warmongers” to accomplish his own ends. Under the Putin and Trump’s Big Surprise scenario, he is pretending to acquiesce to the “Deep State” in order fool them into helping him defeat their own agenda.
Taking North Korea out of circulation as a World War flashpoint would be Phase 1 of his plan. Taking care of China’s ambitions in the South China Sea might be Phase 2. And his crowing achievement will be using the Pentagon troop buildup in Syria to JOIN with Putin, Assad, and Iran in taking out ISIS and Erdogan (instead of ATTACKING Putin, Assad, and Iran, which is what the Neocons are supposedly expecting him to do).
(P.S. – 25 April 2017) – WATCH OUT FOR A DEFECTIVE NUKE
Should the globalists opt for a nuclear warhead in the UN attack, watch for it to potentially fail due to a bad fuse or other defective component. A failed nuclear strike would accomplish the goal of such an attack just a well as a successful one; either way, the UN would be HIGHLY MOTIVATED to “reform” into its new, stronger New World Order form.
Should the warhead fail due to an improperly configured explosive charge that results in a failure to reach critical mass, it could result in a high-level radiation hazard area in the vicinity of the sub-critical explosion. This could make the current UN building unusable without harming the people inside. They would shelter indoors until hazmat teams arrive to screen, decontaminate, and remove them. The abandoned radioactive building would then serve as a monument for why a stronger UN is necessary. And all this would be achieved without the globalists bringing too much “bad karma” upon themselves.
(P.S. – 26 April 2017) – MORE DETAILS ON GOTHAM SHIELD
This Fox5 article gives some details on how Gotham Shield is unfolding, and it reports that MetLife Stadium is the “primary response center” for the drills. It just so happens that the Stadium is just a 9-mile straight shot from UN Headquarters (the red star)…
…From Google Maps
“The purpose is to practice how to assess, treat and evacuate victims during a potential nuclear attack in the New York City area.”
P.P.S. – Facebook is blocking the counter on the share button below (for most page loads), so if it looks like nobody has shared this article, that’s why. Twitter always blocks the counter.