Addendum to Update 6: China built its South China Sea bases for the United Nations

Behold the future UN Peacekeeper base on Fiery Cross Reef…

With everything that I’ve had to cover over the last few weeks, I was forced to leave Updates 6 and 7 incomplete. But now that there is a wee bit of slack time available, I intend to go back and finish them. So let’s begin that process with this addendum to Update 6: China’s coming humiliation in the South China Sea

As I’m sure you’ve heard, China has built military bases atop manmade islands in the highly contested South China Sea. Ostensibly, they did it to enforce their supposed historical claims in the area, but the true purpose behind the construction was to provide the post-“reform” United Nations with bases of operation for their peacekeepers, fishery enforcers, and environmental police.

When the Chinese hand over the bases, though, they won’t be left empty-handed. By claiming exclusive rights in the area and moving to enforce them, they have established themselves as a “claimant” and staked-out a strong bargaining position. In negotiations, it is standard practice to ask for way too much, then “compromise” your way back to what you really want. So once the newly-“reformed” UN rules on what each claimant will get, China will be left with assets in the area that they wouldn’t have received if they hadn’t barged in. Instead of owning nothing in the South China Sea, they’ll own something, and something is better than nothing.

To understand why I say all this, let’s have a look at the situation in the South China Sea…

> China’s globalist-controlled communist government has made claims in the South China Sea that are deliberately ridiculous, outrageous and provocative…

…Just look at how far their red-line region extends from China – and how close it cuts to their neighbors.

> This absurd overreach has led their aggrieved neighbors to begin groping for a regional grouping that can counterbalance Chinese expansionism…

…From the Tokyo Foundation. Here is a notable passage…

China prefers bilateral talks to multilateral talks for discussions of the dispute in South China Sea because it recognises that multilateral talks will result in it losing advantage over individual ASEAN countries. On the other hand, the problems it creates for multilateral security cooperation isolates China in international society.”

In other words, “the individual ASEAN countries need to act multilaterally to take away China’s advantage.” And “China has to stop acting up or it will wind up an isolated backwater like it was before.”

> The Chinese overreach has also set up aggressive nationalists in China for a fall. The Chinese will be chastened by their coming humiliation in the South China Sea, and strident nationalistic voices will lose face and fall out of favor. This, the globalists hope, will leave the Chinese “better multilateral citizens.” Just have a look at the thinking behind this strategy…

…From LSE Research Online

In case the insufferable “academic tone” of the abstract obscures its point, it’s basically saying that Chinese nationalism is getting in the way of its multilateralism (and from the globalist perspective, that’s a big no-no)…

“…multilateralism is an effective way for Beijing to increase its regional power while avoiding confrontation with the United States or regional powers like India and Japan. However, Beijing’s multilateralism is still premised on hard conceptions of state sovereignty and has to be developed in the context of a nationalistic political culture that prevents the achievement of regional stability through compromise on issues such as the South China Sea disputes…”

With the three preceding bullet points in mind, you begin to see how the South China Sea scenario is scripted to play out…

1) Trump and Xi will blunder into a confrontation over the area.

2) China will be forced to compromise and retreat.

3) When they retreat from their bases, they’ll have to hand them over to someone. Since they won’t want to give the bases to their regional rivals or the United States, they’ll hand them over to a “neutral party” that will enforce and secure their “legitimate” economic claims and security needs in the area: the “reformed” United Nations (NWO) that will rise after the conflict.

4) The UN NWO will use the bases to enforce the post-conflict compromise, patrol the fisheries to stop the conflict among fishing and coast guard vessels in the area, and take control of maritime environmental monitoring and management.

That being said, the Chinese won’t be the only ones chastened by a South China Sea conflict. Although the clash would end in a victory or favorable draw for the US side, America would likely suffer a serious bloody nose. Considering all the media attention given to the nuclear threat supposedly posed by the North Koreans, this bloody nose could take the form of a nuke going off somewhere – either in a US territory or a US military base – but the most likely scenario is that the globalists will script the destruction of the USS Carl Vinson (either through conventional or nuclear means).

The aircraft carrier is the most potent symbol of America’s ability to project power anywhere in the world. By having one sunk along with the 6,000 lives aboard, the globalists will shatter the American sense of invincibility, and the nation will thereafter be much more skittish about sending its carriers into other nations’ backyards. This will result in BOTH China and America pulling back after the conflict, and that will open a power vacuum that a stronger United Nations can fill.

Also, the globalists could use the event to trigger their coup/counter-coup psyop with Trump. The psyop script calls for the supposed “neocon-neolib Deep State” to pounce on Trump and remove him from office through either impeachment, assassination, or suiciding. And if they use the conflict with China as cover for making their move, this is the argument they’ll present…

“Trump has only been in office a few months, and he has already got us into a shooting war with nuclear-armed China and got an aircraft carrier sunk. We have to remove this bumbling lunatic before he destroys the nation!”

So a South China Sea conflict could end up taking out both Xi and Trump. This would be no surprise given that both are considered nationalists, and that both the Chinese and the Americans are known for their nationalistic fervor. Therefore it’s not just Chinese nationalism that will take a hit if the two nations come to blows.

As is outlined in Update 1, Update 6, and Update 7, leaders who are “more reasonable, soft-spoken, civil, and cooperative” will take the place of the fallen nationalists, namely Li Keqiang and, after the counter-coup, Rand Paul…

…From Zero Hedge

Rand Paul will play Galba to Donald Trump’s Vindex…

“Galba, acclaimed by the Senate, struck coins to commemorate Vindex, to whom he owed his position as emperor.” – From Wikipedia

Now if we step back and take a bird’s eye view of what the globalists are doing with China and the South China Sea, we see the strategy they hinted at back in 1961 at play…

…From Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Reports, page 26

As the underlined passages suggest, they are using China’s seizure of the South China Sea to create a problem “the separate [ASEAN] nations will not be able to solve alone.” This pressures those nations to “organize and act in common effort” in a “regional institution” to preserve their national interests.

So let’s make a list of all the ways the South China Sea conflict serves the globalist agenda…

1) It serves as one of the three conflict zones (along with Syria and Ukraine) through which they are fomenting a global war crisis that will give rise to its “logical solution”: the “reformed” UN system (the multilateral / multipolar NWO).

2) It serves to push the ASEAN nations towards a multilateral approach to their (manufactured) common problem. As each aggrieved nation sees the futility of facing China on its own, they grope their way towards a regional security institution that can counterbalance Chinese aggression.

3) It serves as an object lesson to the Chinese and American peoples on the fruits of aggressive nationalism. Once their overreach in the South China Sea leads to their national humiliation, the Chinese will see the wisdom of working with others multilaterally rather than aggressively confronting them unilaterally. And once the Americans get shocked and bloodied by unilaterally poking their nose into a foreign conflict, they will be more inclined to fall back and stick with a multilateral diplomatic approach. This will make both peoples better citizens of the New World Order.

As for when the direct clash between the US and China could begin, we could see the first step in that direction next week when Trump meets Xi at the Mar-a-Lago resort on April 6-7…

…From CNN

If the meeting is portrayed as having gone south, a personal conflict between them could be narrated from there. And given that the Japanese will send their helicopter carrier into the South China Sea in May, a shooting war could be triggered any time from May onward.

With love…