(Prescript – 11 December 2016) – Due to the developments of the last few days, there are three points that need addressing…
POINT 1: Earlier in this entry, I said…
…be on the lookout for a Trump controversy that supposedly angers the Republican electors before the 19th. If you see such a thing develop in the mainstream or alternative media, it means they’re establishing justification for an increased number of faithless electors at the December 19 vote.
Just a day after I posted this, news came out that Trump has chosen the current president of Goldman Sachs to run his economic policy team. And the day after that, we heard news that he will choose the current head of ExxonMobil as his secretary of state. These cartoonishly blatant Establishment choices has led to talk of Trump performing a bait and switch on the electorate.
On top of that, they’ve come out with this…
…From Google News
So in just two days, the globalists have established the public justification for a double-digit loss of Trump electors to either Hillary or a protest candidate.
POINT 2: The UN General Assembly voted on Friday to demand an immediate ceasefire in Syria…
As I noted yesterday, a Russian choice to grant such a ceasefire before Aleppo is fully captured would mean the globalists are saving the final Aleppo showdown for a temporary Paul Ryan presidency. After Ryan is sworn in, the final battle would begin and he would declare a no-fly zone over Aleppo to start a direct confrontation with Russia.
But if Aleppo is taken before January 20, the globalists will likely opt for a direct ground confrontation between Syrian and Turkish forces or a high-casualty attack on US special forces in Syria. Ryan would then order a forceful response to “aid our Turkish allies” or “stop attacks on US forces.”
The sole purpose behind a Paul Ryan caretaker presidency (or a Hillary Clinton momentary presidency) is to take us to the brink, or slightly past the brink, of war with Russia (since Obama seems unwilling to let it happen on his watch). And this war would be stopped by a US military coup at one of two points…
- the moment Ryan gives the order for the war-starting provocation, thus stopping the war before it begins, or
- the moment the war leads to a high threat of a nuclear exchange, thus stopping the war before nukes are employed by either side.
POINT 3: You may have noticed that Trump has appointed three former generals to high positions in his administration…
…From a Google News search for trump generals
And just yesterday, he attended the annual Army-Navy football game…
…From the Military Times
He is doing this to be publicly seen courting the military, thus creating backstory for why the military “counter-coup” will put him in office after the Democrats carry out their “soft coup” in the Electoral College. Among the federal institutions, the military has the best public image, so the globalists have tasked the Pentagon with the lead role in “stopping the Democrat coup” and unseating Paul Ryan (or Hillary Clinton). This is all part of the globalist coup/counter-coup operation I talked about in Why the globalists will announce Trump as the winner of the election.
(Prescript – 10 December 2016) – If Russia acts in accordance with yesterday’s UN resolution and establishes a ceasefire before Aleppo is fully captured, it means the globalists are saving the final showdown in Aleppo for a temporary Paul Ryan presidency. It therefore means we’ll see mischief in the electoral college on December 19 and a short war after January 20. I’ll expand on this later…
(Prescript – 8 December 2016)
> the recount disputes in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin were leading to a situation in which only 15 faithless electors could have disrupted the outcome of the election, and
> controlled alt-media sources like Infowars were specifically talking about the existence of 15 faithless electors,
…it’s pretty safe to assume that the disputed Electoral College scenario outlined in this entry has, in fact, been in play. And with the mainstream media focusing people’s attention on the fact that Stein’s recounts couldn’t reverse the election outcomes in the three states, this back door scenario would have really caught people by surprise.
Now that the Michigan recount is essentially dead, though, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the scenario has died with it. There are five conditions under which it could still play out…
Condition 1: Michigan’s electors show up and are valid, but not Pennsylvania and Wisconsin’s. And 23 faithless Trump electors (7.5% of his total electors) change their votes to Hillary. This is the current condition now that Judge Goldsmith has ended the recount in Michigan.
Condition 2: Michigan and Wisconsin’s electors show up and are valid, but not Pennsylvania’s. And 28 faithless Trump electors (9.2% of his total electors) change their votes to Hillary. We’ll face this condition if Judge Diamond grants Stein a Pennsylvania recount on Friday AND Wisconsin completes its recount by the 13th.
Condition 3: Michigan and Pennsylvania’s electors show up and are valid, but not Wisconsin’s. And 33 faithless Trump electors (10.8% of his total electors) change their votes to Hillary. We’ll face this condition if Judge Diamond denies Stein a Pennsylvania recount on Friday AND Wisconsin is unable to complete its recount by the 13th.
Condition 4: All electors show up and are valid. And 38 faithless Trump electors (12.4% of his total electors) change their votes to Hillary. We’ll face this condition if Judge Diamond denies Stein a Pennsylvania recount on Friday AND Wisconsin completes its recount by the 13th.
Condition 5: However many electors vote, there are a sufficient number of faithless electors to deny both candidates an absolute majority of votes. This would result in a hung Electoral College, and the Presidency would be decided by the House of Representatives voting for one of the three candidates who won the most electoral votes in the election. Since Trump and Clinton won all of the electoral votes, it would be one of them. I’ll go into the sticky details of this scenario in the next addition.
Given these potentialities, be on the lookout for a Trump controversy that supposedly angers the Republican electors before the 19th. If you see such a thing develop in the mainstream or alternative media, it means they’re establishing justification for an increased number of faithless electors at the December 19 vote.
(Prescript – 9 December 2016)
If we revisit the Electoral College information page at the National Archives website, we see what lies ahead from the 19th onward…
As you can see, the electors meet in their respective states and vote, then they seal the votes and pass them on to Congress. So we might not know the result of the Electoral College election until the votes are unsealed and officially counted on…
If the Electoral College votes for Hillary or is hung, it is safe to assume that there will be objections to the vote in Congress and lawsuits filed in the courts. Should Congress delay certifying a Hillary election or voting for President (after a hung electoral vote) until all the objections and lawsuits are settled, the process could very well end up taking more than two weeks to resolve. And this means the offices of President and Vice-President would be vacant on January 20, and Paul Ryan would temporarily take the Presidency.
As for any talk among the “rogue electors” about electing a third, compromise candidate, that simply won’t fly. How would 50 or so rogue electors convince another 220 electors to vote for a candidate who didn’t even stand in the election? It would be seen as a disenfranchisement of the entire electorate, and both Republicans and Democrats would rage against it. Such third candidate talk is merely a cover for a deliberate effort to hang the Electoral College vote.
By the way, expect a big shock to the markets as soon as the public finds out about an election reversal or hung electoral vote. The dizzying “Trump rally” would pop like a bubble.
And with that, I’ll finally call this entry complete (for now).
NOW HERE IS THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE>>>
If Jill Stein succeeds in preventing Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania’s electors from attending the electoral college, Hillary Clinton will need to get only 15 Trump electors to change their votes in order to win the Presidency. Here’s why…
In order to become President of the United States, one must receive an absolute majority (more than half) of votes in the Electoral College. Since there are currently 538 electoral slots in the College, if we divide that by two, we get 269 (which is exactly half). So to get an absolute majority, a presidential candidate needs one vote over that, which is 270.
But what happens if the 46 combined electors of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania don’t show up?
The electoral college would meet with only 492 electors. And if we divide that by two, we get 246 (which is exactly half). So to get an absolute majority in this case, a presidential candidate needs one vote over that, which is 247. Since Hillary already has 232, she’d need only 15 more to win.
But why would Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania’s electors fail to show up?
Because the recounts and the court cases surrounding them might prevent those states from certifying their electors in time…
As you can see, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania have only 10 days to wrap up the recounts and court challenges and certify their electors. If they don’t, they might have no electors to send for the December 19 presidential vote.
And this is where the Clinton/Stein strategy reveals itself…
> Stein waited until the last possible moment to file for the recounts, thus assuring the recount efforts would have the minimum amount of time possible to complete them.
> Stein is further slowing down the recount efforts by insisting on hand counts and filing lawsuits.
So if the globalists opt to grant her success in her efforts, she will put Hillary within striking distance in the Electoral College, and that’s where the Clinton Machine will kick in. They have likely already identified the weakest links among the Trump electors – those who have skeletons in their closets and are persuadable by death threats and bribes – and they need turn only 15 of them (just 3% of the total electors) to succeed in “stealing the election.” But even then it wouldn’t be over.
There is another bump along the way to becoming President…
Should Stein and Clinton succeed in “stealing the electoral vote,” there would be a hellstorm in Congress. But I won’t go into that until we see how the vote goes.
All this being said, I consider it unlikely that the globalists will opt for this path, but I won’t rule it out either. The war path to the NWO will not be closed until Trump takes office (for the reasons given in my previous entry).
(P.S. – 5 December 2016) – Here is something I came across during this morning’s infoscan…
So it appears that the 15 electors I talked about in this entry are already lined up.
(P.S – 5 December 2016) – THE PAUL RYAN SCENARIO
Whilst pondering the Stein/Clinton recount strategy, I realized that regardless of which way a disputed Electoral College vote might go, Paul Ryan would be placed in the Presidency on January 20. To see why, let’s recall the reason for the December 13 deadline…
So if Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania’s recount controversies are not settled before December 14, the validity of their electoral votes becomes legally questionable. This means that even if they send their electors to the vote on the 19th, motions to discount their votes can be made in both the courts and the Congress.
That being said, a missed December 13 deadline in all three recount states would give rise to two scenarios for a disputed Electoral College vote…
1) The three states’ 46 electors are unable to attend the December 19 vote and 15 or more “faithless Trump electors” from other states switch their votes to Hillary, resulting in a Hillary win. The Republicans could then dispute the “disenfranchisement” of the three states’ voters by the Democrats’ sneaky legal maneuvers (done with plausible deniability through Stein), and if they win their challenge, Trump’s victory will be restored.
2) The three states’ 46 electors attend the December 19 vote despite the disputes and vote Trump. This would result in a Trump win despite the faithless electors. The Democrats could then dispute the votes of the 46 electors, and if they win their challenge, Hillary wins the Presidency.
Either way it turns out, who gets the Presidency would be decided by the courts and Congress. And this “weighty responsibility,” along with the legal can of worms opened by the whole situation, could result in the final decision taking several weeks or months to reach. That raises an obvious question…
What happens if there are no clear Electoral winners to take the offices of the President and Vice-President when Obama’s term expires on January 20?
The Presidency would temporarily fall in the lap of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Paul Ryan. And given the fact that he just passed a House resolution calling on the President to study options for a no-fly zone over Syria, he’d likely implement such a policy and trigger a war with Russia.
By the way, regardless of any drama that might be coming, Trump will eventually be sworn in as President. It’s what the globalist agenda calls for.
(P.S. – 6 December 2016)
Do I look like a man you can trust?…
…Judge Paul Steven Diamond
A key step in enacting the disputed Electoral College scenario is getting a recall triggered in Pennsylvania. And wouldn’t you know it, Jill Stein’s federal lawsuit is being heard by Judge Paul S. Diamond, whose hometown is Brooklyn, NY (home to Chabad-Lubavitch’s world headquarters). With a surname and hometown like those, I’m wondering if there’s a connection.
Whether there is or not, Judge Diamond has scheduled a hearing for Friday afternoon. So if he grants Stein the recount then, the state would have only 4 days to complete it in order to meet the December 13 deadline. This would seem to be an unworkable time frame, so Diamond is basically holding Pennsylvania’s electors in his hands. Let’s see what he does with them.
P.P.S – Watch for Democrat-controlled precincts in all three states dragging their feet on the recounts to ensure the deadline is not met.
(P.S. – 7 December 2016) – Last night, news came out that a Michigan appeals court has ruled against Jill Stein’s recount, but the recount continues under an order from a federal judge, Mark Goldsmith. Goldsmith has scheduled a hearing for 10:30 AM today to address a motion to end the recount on account of the state court’s decision. If he orders the recount to continue, I’d expect Judge Diamond to issue an order on Friday for Pennsylvania’s recount to begin.
On a side note, Judge Goldsmith and Judge Diamond received their commissions on June 22, 2010 and June 22, 2004 respectively.
P.P.S. – Judge Goldsmith backed off on the Michigan recount, so it appears that the threat of a disputed Electoral College vote is waning. If Michigan’s electors now show up on the 19th and are valid, but Wisconsin and Pennsylvania’s electors remain in limbo, Hillary Clinton would need 23 faithless Trump electors to switch their votes to her in order to win. I’ll wrap this entry up in the morning, then move on to something new.
(P.S. – 4 December 2016) – There were some interesting election outcomes in Europe today, including the election of Alexander Van der Bellen in Austria…
…From NBC News/AP
Despite being critical of Russia in public, he has quite a connection to them behind the scenes…
His “noble” status may be why the globalists went against theme (their shift of Europe to the right) in (s)electing him.